Hi!
I still need help on this case, any advice is appreciated.
2009/4/25 Igor Tarasov :
> Hi!
>
> I've found few visual glitches in comctl32/toolbar, and now try to
> write this all down as conformance tests, but I have some problems. I
> see that there is bug, when I test it with control spy. Bu
Don't commit this one. I forgot to pre-multiply the alpha.
Vincent Povirk
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Vincent Povirk
wrote:
>
>
>
>
2009/5/20 Tim Wright
> The EvE-online updater blows up because it's trying to set the download
> priority in BITS (qmgr) and that isn't implemented. Simply stubbing it to
> return S_OK is sufficient to allow it to work.
>
> Third attempt at sending. For some reason, it isn't being posted from
> g
In "dlls/wininet/tests/urlcache.c", GetDiskInfoA is called,
but wininet.dll (native and wine) export this function only by ordinal.
When I build the crosstest, my mingw
[i586-mingw32msvc-gcc (GCC) 4.2.1-sjlj (mingw32-2)]
creates a named Import for GetDiskInfoA with an ordinal hint of 65.
Using
OK, it is now enabled.
-Newman
Austin English wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Igor Tarasov wrote:
attachment.cgi shows that it relies on allow_attachment_display
parameter in bugzilla configuration. It has to be set to true.
--
Igor
Can a bugzilla admin please enable this?
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Igor Tarasov wrote:
> attachment.cgi shows that it relies on allow_attachment_display
> parameter in bugzilla configuration. It has to be set to true.
>
> --
> Igor
>
Can a bugzilla admin please enable this?
--
-Austin
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Judy Devyak wrote:
>
>
>
>
You forgot the patch.
--
-Austin
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Roderick Colenbrander
wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Mike Kronenberg
> wrote:
>> On 18.05.2009, at 06:56, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
>>
>>> "James McKenzie" wrote:
>>>
Austin:
Contact Mike Kronenberg or Zach Drayer and see what they currently
>>
Hi Paul,
Paul Vriens wrote:
Jacek Caban wrote:
---
dlls/urlmon/tests/protocol.c | 723
+++---
1 files changed, 608 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-)
Hi Jacek,
This introduces ex
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Mike Kronenberg
wrote:
> On 18.05.2009, at 06:56, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
>
>> "James McKenzie" wrote:
>>
>>> Austin:
>>> Contact Mike Kronenberg or Zach Drayer and see what they currently
>>> have.
>>
>> IMHO since they haven't even bothered so far to change the
Is there a specific reason for using malloc() in these tests?
Testing that rpcrt4 does not assume HeapAlloc pointers? (but why would
it even care?)
Here are the relevant lines:
in midl_user_allocate():
dlls/rpcrt4/tests/server.c:56: use HeapXxx(): return malloc(n);
in array_tests():
dlls/rpcrt
On 18.05.2009, at 06:56, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
"James McKenzie" wrote:
Austin:
Contact Mike Kronenberg or Zach Drayer and see what they currently
have.
IMHO since they haven't even bothered so far to change the license
from
GPL to LGPL to match Wine, and clarify what exactly is so much
Hi,
It's not about being willing to, but plain lack of time.
I follow this list closely and work as time permits.
After half a year, it's been four weeks now that I am able again to
build and test on a regular base again.
There are other components on OS X that need some love, like the
wine
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 01:46:31PM +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Marcus Meissner wrote:
>> +lend2:
>> TRACE("%d <--\n", bSuccess);
>> return bSuccess;
>> }
> Hi Marcus,
>
> After AJ's remark you marked this Coverity one as "lpwhr can not be NULL".
> Should we thus delete the "NULL == lpw
> It seems the bugzilla upgrade stopped allowing opening attachments in
> browser.
I can comfirm this on several platforms and browsers.
//Nicklas
15 matches
Mail list logo
