It seems the bugzilla upgrade stopped allowing opening attachments in
browser. Not sure if that's by choice or just an unchanged setting,
but having to open .txt/.jpeg/.png files in outside applications is a
bit annoying...Any possibility of fixing that?
--
-Austin
In the process of working on this bug
(http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18371), I have discovered that user32's
SetCursor function does not ensure that the the handle passed is valid or that
it is even a handle to a cursor object (and it seems that the lingo for user32
objects is "resourc
Well, it seems that the engine fixes some unrelated bugs too :-)
Bugs 15146 and 10408, as reported by a tester.
BTW In a couple of weeks all (few) remaining failing tests should be fixed.
Then I'll try to optimize somehow the mixed blitting, which is the only
stuff that remains slower than origin
oops, I meant to reply-all on this.
--- On Mon, 5/18/09, Daniel Santos wrote:
From: Daniel Santos
Subject: Re: Detecting an invalid handle in setupapi
To: "Paul Vriens"
Date: Monday, May 18, 2009, 5:43 PM
I'm so very glad you brought this up Paul. I'm new to wine development
and I've been wo
Jacek Caban wrote:
---
dlls/urlmon/tests/protocol.c | 723
+++---
1 files changed, 608 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-)
Hi Jacek,
This introduces extra failures on what seems to
André Hentschel wrote:
---
tools/winemaker |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Hi André,
Not a comment on the patch itself but this is the third time you tried
with the same patch.
We
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Am Montag, 18. Mai 2009 22:46:59 schrieb Lei Zhang:
>> It didn't think so either, so I even double checked. Upon further
>> investigation, it seems the problem is simply the gecko cab download
>> is failing. Either one of the Sourceforge se
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:47 AM, Kai Blin wrote:
> That depends on being able to test a lot of applications, though.
I'm working on it :-)
--
-Austin
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 03:39:07PM +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Paul Vriens writes:
>
> > I don't think this is correct. This test has always succeeded until
> > March 9th. There haven't been any changes to the test in that period,
> > but I remember an upgrade of winehq in that weekend.
>
Paul Vriens writes:
> I don't think this is correct. This test has always succeeded until
> March 9th. There haven't been any changes to the test in that period,
> but I remember an upgrade of winehq in that weekend.
>
> In other words, there is more to it. Testing a simple cross compiled
> versi
Vincent Povirk writes:
> It's odd, but it seems like the simplest way to write this.
>
> I've tried what I think was your suggestion, and that's attached. I
> don't think it's an improvement.
You should short-circuit the src_space == dst_space case, that would
simplify things a lot. Then you can
Marcus Meissner wrote:
Hi,
Not sure if we need to set these values in all error paths,
but definitely not in the NULL lpwhr. (lpwhdr?)
Ciao, Marcus
---
dlls/wininet/http.c |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/wininet/http.c b/dlls/wininet/http.c
inde
Huw Davies wrote:
---
dlls/ntdll/tests/rtlstr.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Hi,
I don't think this is correct. This test has always succeeded until
March 9th. There haven't been any c
Paul Vriens wrote:
Huw Davies wrote:
---
dlls/ole32/tests/usrmarshal.c | 38
+-
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Hi Huw,
Could you have a look at the test res
Jacek Caban writes:
> ---
> dlls/urlmon/tests/url.c | 782
> ++-
> 1 files changed, 636 insertions(+), 146 deletions(-)
This is failing here:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M urlmon.dll -T ../../.. -p
urlmon_test.exe.so url.c && touch url.ok
ur
Am Montag, 18. Mai 2009 22:46:59 schrieb Lei Zhang:
> It didn't think so either, so I even double checked. Upon further
> investigation, it seems the problem is simply the gecko cab download
> is failing. Either one of the Sourceforge servers is down/flaky, or
> source.winehq.org is taking too long
On Tuesday 19 May 2009 01:45:14 Scott Ritchie wrote:
> I don't think we'll get much traction with this unless we can reasonably
> tell them they only need to test the stable Wine release. But 1.0 is
> pretty old these days, so they probably won't bother.
>
> I'll add it to my list of evangelism t
17 matches
Mail list logo
