Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
On Mo, 2009-05-18 at 16:07 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
+hcat = pCryptCATOpen(emptyW, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+todo_wine
+{
+ok(hcat != NULL && hcat != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, "Expected a
correct handle\n");
+ok(GetLastError() == ERROR_SUCCESS,
+ "Expected ERRO
2009/5/19 Austin English :
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:48 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>> 1. Find apps that work pretty much perfectly in Wine.
>> 2. Ask them to declare Wine officially supported.
>> 3. Add them to http://wiki.winehq.org/AppsThatSupportWine
>> 4. Use 3. to add more to 2.
>
> You forgot
David Gerard wrote:
2009/5/18 Brian Vincent :
Which leads me to my $.02: I wonder if there's a sweet spot for Wine
adoption somewhere in the middle-tier of the software application popularity
contest. For instance, rather than going after Photoshop or Photoshop
Elements (which is still a noble
Vincent Povirk wrote:
It's odd, but it seems like the simplest way to write this.
I've tried what I think was your suggestion, and that's attached. I
don't think it's an improvement.
Vincent Povirk
Could be a single switch maybe. Don't know, looks better for me.
Comparisons were really ugl
It's odd, but it seems like the simplest way to write this.
I've tried what I think was your suggestion, and that's attached. I
don't think it's an improvement.
Vincent Povirk
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> Vincent Povirk wrote:
>
> From 1de9b2291bf9a5617ca1e3b0cba5f1
Vincent Povirk wrote:
From 1de9b2291bf9a5617ca1e3b0cba5f1260889c259 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vincent Povirk
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:34:12 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] gdiplus: implement GdipTransformPoints
It's a strange way to check enumeration with integer comparison, isn't it?
And not c
On Mo, 2009-05-18 at 16:07 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
> +hcat = pCryptCATOpen(emptyW, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> +todo_wine
> +{
> +ok(hcat != NULL && hcat != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, "Expected a
> correct handle\n");
> +ok(GetLastError() == ERROR_SUCCESS,
> + "Expected ERROR_SUCCESS, got
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:48 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> 1. Find apps that work pretty much perfectly in Wine.
> 2. Ask them to declare Wine officially supported.
> 3. Add them to http://wiki.winehq.org/AppsThatSupportWine
> 4. Use 3. to add more to 2.
You forgot:
5.
6. Profit!
:-)
--
-Aust
2009/5/18 Brian Vincent :
> Which leads me to my $.02: I wonder if there's a sweet spot for Wine
> adoption somewhere in the middle-tier of the software application popularity
> contest. For instance, rather than going after Photoshop or Photoshop
> Elements (which is still a noble goal), what ab
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
> Lei Zhang wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Lei Zhang wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Stefan Dösinger
>>> wrote:
>>>
Hi,
Is my setup broken, or does the gecko installation fail? In a new wine
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Steven Edwards wrote:
> doubt it. The situation I face with my day job, is that we can't even
> get support for certain applications in VMware. As soon as we say "we
> have a virtualized cluster" they balk. And we are talking about
> situations where we are spendin
On Mo, 2009-05-18 at 19:30 +0400, Vitaly Perov wrote:
> ---
> dlls/winspool.drv/info.c | 36 +++-
> 1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
The correct location for an implementation is localspl.dll
For which Application did you changed the stub?
The
Lei Zhang wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Lei Zhang wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Stefan Dösinger
wrote:
Hi,
Is my setup broken, or does the gecko installation fail? In a new wine prefix,
when I open builtin iexplore, I get the installation dialog. The download
run
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Lei Zhang wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Stefan Dösinger
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Is my setup broken, or does the gecko installation fail? In a new wine
>> prefix,
>> when I open builtin iexplore, I get the installation dialog. The download
>> runs success
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Stefan Dösinger
wrote:
> Hi,
> Is my setup broken, or does the gecko installation fail? In a new wine prefix,
> when I open builtin iexplore, I get the installation dialog. The download
> runs successfully, but after installation iexplore still says that HTML
> re
Hi,
Is my setup broken, or does the gecko installation fail? In a new wine prefix,
when I open builtin iexplore, I get the installation dialog. The download
runs successfully, but after installation iexplore still says that HTML
rendering is currently disabled. When I run iexplore again, I again
Am Montag, 18. Mai 2009 17:44:17 schrieb Tony Wasserka:
> +HRESULT LoadFileIntoMemoryA(LPCSTR filename, LPVOID *buffer, DWORD *length)
Do you need this function? Woudn't it be better to wrap A->W at the API level
and have all internal functions W only?
> +handle = CreateFileW(filename, GENER
Huw Davies wrote:
---
dlls/ole32/tests/usrmarshal.c | 38 +-
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Hi Huw,
Could you have a look at the test results are test.winehq.o
2009/5/18 Francois Gouget :
> On Mon, 18 May 2009, Reece Dunn wrote:
> [...]
>> I was thinking of some sort of auto-layout logic, using bounding box
>> calculations and metric information fed from Windows guidelines. The
>> idea here is to give a consistent layout and make it easier to add new
>> c
Am Montag, den 18.05.2009, 13:41 +0200 schrieb Massimo Del Fedele:
> > Be careful with such statements. Look at bug 6519 for example.
> Yep, I've seen the bug :-)
> Anyways, most failures are fixed by now, also for monochrome bitmaps.
> Did you test it on bug's 6519 app ?
No, I don't really care.
Aric Stewart writes:
> ---
> dlls/msctf/context.c | 68
> ++--
> dlls/msctf/tests/inputprocessor.c | 29 +++-
> include/textstor.idl |2 +
> 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
It doesn't work here:
..
Michael Karcher ha scritto:
Am Sonntag, den 17.05.2009, 17:35 +0200 schrieb Massimo Del Fedele:
1) Some color on monochrome bitmaps here I guess nobody knows how to do it
right. I fixed some todo wine (most) but have 2 failures which wine does right.
Seldom used anyways, and happens only on
Austin English ha scritto:
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Massimo Del Fedele wrote:
Austin, could you please retest it against test suite ?
I've ran it, but it doesn't appear to be showing up on
test.winehq.org. I'll investigate why when I get a bit more time.
P.S., there's now a crash in
Marcus Meissner writes:
> Not sure if we need to set these values in all error paths,
> but definitely not in the NULL lpwhr. (lpwhdr?)
There's no reason to have NULL checks in internal functions.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
On Mon, 18 May 2009, Reece Dunn wrote:
[...]
> I was thinking of some sort of auto-layout logic, using bounding box
> calculations and metric information fed from Windows guidelines. The
> idea here is to give a consistent layout and make it easier to add new
> controls.
>
> I am aware that this i
2009/5/16 Francois Gouget :
> On Tue, 12 May 2009, Reece Dunn wrote:
> [...]
>> What I would like to do is get an automated (or semi-automated) tool,
>> ideally with a GUI interface to it. That would ultimately put the
>> designer in charge. Hopefully, this would also mean that you have a
>> base r
Mikołaj Zalewski wrote:
>
>> Yes, handling the translation of Wine's resource files would be really
>> nice. It would let us leverage a lot of the po tools, especially the
>> website based ones. This would make it much easier for users to
>> contribute to the translations (right now it's pretty in
Am Sonntag, den 17.05.2009, 17:35 +0200 schrieb Massimo Del Fedele:
> 1) Some color on monochrome bitmaps here I guess nobody knows how to do
> it right. I fixed some todo wine (most) but have 2 failures which wine does
> right.
> Seldom used anyways, and happens only on weird palettes. I gue
28 matches
Mail list logo
