Luke Benstead wrote:
> 2009/5/15 Stefan Dösinger :
>
>> Am Freitag, 15. Mai 2009 13:52:23 schrieb Luke Benstead:
>>
>>> Reference counts are wrong in Wine which causes some games to fail.
>>> I'm working patches to make these tests pass so we can remove the
>>> todo_wine's.
>>>
>>> Luke.
>>
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Reece Dunn wrote:
[...]
> What I would like to do is get an automated (or semi-automated) tool,
> ideally with a GUI interface to it. That would ultimately put the
> designer in charge. Hopefully, this would also mean that you have a
> base resource file that produces the Engli
Hello,
If it's clear the distro list is quite messed, I think the distinction
between Ubuntu Kubuntu and Xubuntu must be kept, because for install, Ubuntu
ships with PulseAudio and Compiz by default, which cause a lot of problems,
while Xubuntu is free of that and has its compositor shutdown by de
2009/5/15 Robert Key
> Same patch but with the 2048MB X2 comment removed, thanks
> Roderick.
>
>
the previous try has been commited today... so if you want to fix the
comment you have to send another patch, or leave it like it is.
Hi,
It's getting more and more strange in our AppDB.
If a user is running Ubuntu 9.04, he has 14 options which distribution
called Ubuntu 9.04 to choose.
14?
There only should be two, the 32-Bit and the 64-Bit Version.
If we don't stop that we get more and more chaos in our DB.
So why this mess?
2009/5/15 Stefan Dösinger :
> Am Freitag, 15. Mai 2009 13:52:23 schrieb Luke Benstead:
>> Reference counts are wrong in Wine which causes some games to fail.
>> I'm working patches to make these tests pass so we can remove the
>> todo_wine's.
>>
>> Luke.
>
> The patch adds trailing whitespeaces in
Am Freitag, 15. Mai 2009 13:52:23 schrieb Luke Benstead:
> Reference counts are wrong in Wine which causes some games to fail.
> I'm working patches to make these tests pass so we can remove the
> todo_wine's.
>
> Luke.
The patch adds trailing whitespeaces in a few lines. Please remove them.
Othe
Francois Gouget writes:
> It's not very clean to encapsulate malloc() & co with xmalloc(), etc,
> but to then call free() directly. It means if the implementation of
> xmalloc() is changed to call HeapAlloc() all the free() have to be
> changed. So encapsulate free() too.
xmalloc() is clearly
Rolf Kalbermatter wrote:
From: Paul Vriens [mailto:paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com]
How can I make sure the pointers to the strings are correctly
passed back as well? Should the RPC stuff take care of these
pointers and 'translate' them?
Those pointers are not really pointers but byte offsets fro
The patch itself is correct but the comment regarding the X2 4800 is
incorrect. Those cards indeed have 2GB of video memory (and the PR
people mention that to you) but the boards contain two GPUs and both
need a have a copy of textures and other resources (though the GPUs
can communicate using a hi
10 matches
Mail list logo
