Re: RFC on Base Wine Config

2009-05-02 Thread Ben Klein
2009/5/3 chris ahrendt : > > Juan Lang wrote: >>> ok then I am very confused then... >>> I deleted the / mapping all together and then ran the dotest script and >>> the make test scripts >>> dotest fails if the / mapping is not there along with the inetmib1 >>> test.  I opened a bug >>> concerning

Re: RFC on Base Wine Config

2009-05-02 Thread chris ahrendt
Juan Lang wrote: >> ok then I am very confused then... >> I deleted the / mapping all together and then ran the dotest script and >> the make test scripts >> dotest fails if the / mapping is not there along with the inetmib1 >> test. I opened a bug >> concerning the inetmib test failing and was t

Re: RFC on Base Wine Config

2009-05-02 Thread Juan Lang
> ok then I am very confused then... > I deleted the / mapping all together and then ran the dotest script and > the make test scripts > dotest fails if the / mapping is not there along with the inetmib1 > test.  I opened a bug > concerning the inetmib test failing and was told that my configuratio

Re: RFC on Base Wine Config

2009-05-02 Thread chris ahrendt
Ben Klein wrote: > 2009/5/3 chris ahrendt : > >> I have noticed something with reporting bugs and problems that are >> encountered... >> >> If the user is allowed to delete the Z: share to / once this is done >> things start acting strange or not working. >> > > In general, you can't run

Re: RFC on Base Wine Config

2009-05-02 Thread Ben Klein
2009/5/3 chris ahrendt : > > I have noticed something with reporting bugs and problems that are > encountered... > > If the user is allowed to delete the Z: share to /  once this is done > things start acting strange or not working. In general, you can't run apps outside of what's linked to in dos

RFC on Base Wine Config

2009-05-02 Thread chris ahrendt
I have noticed something with reporting bugs and problems that are encountered... If the user is allowed to delete the Z: share to / once this is done things start acting strange or not working. Many people have done this for various reasons. My suggestion is to do the following: 1. If we ha

Re: error report

2009-05-02 Thread James McKenzie
Ruben Hillewaere wrote: > Hello, > > > I wanted to install (Dar)wine on my Intel Mac, first I've tried with > the binaries found on http://wiki.winehq.org/MacOSX/Installing The > installation goes fine, but running any of the apps fails. > > So, instead, I've tried to build Wine from Scratch, this

Re: IE and MSN Messenger 7.0

2009-05-02 Thread Ben Klein
2009/5/1 Remco : > On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Ben Klein wrote: >> 2009/5/1 Cissyvonwinckelmann : >>> hartelijk dank Benm ja ik moet snel een andere pc hebben, want dit is een >>> hele ouwe dan krijg je de moeilijkheden, >>> groetjes cissy >>> >> >> I have to use Google Language Tools to trans

Re: Severity levels

2009-05-02 Thread Ben Klein
I really didn't think this one deserved even my comment, but here goes. 2009/5/3 Austin English : > 2009/5/1 Nicklas Börjesson : >> Current severity levels are perfect for server applications where everything >> is simply about functionality working or not working. >> However, the overwhelming ma

Re: Giving up for now

2009-05-02 Thread Ben Klein
2009/5/3 Joel Holdsworth : > On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 22:56 +0200, Roderick Colenbrander wrote: >> Why again did you need this specific alphablend method? The icon can't >> be converted to use some basic color keying for transparency or so? > > The reason is that the outlines will look aliased, and th

Re: Giving up for now

2009-05-02 Thread Joel Holdsworth
On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 22:56 +0200, Roderick Colenbrander wrote: > On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Joel Holdsworth > wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 20:38 +0200, Roderick Colenbrander wrote: > >> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Joel Holdsworth > >> wrote: > >> > Hi All, > >> > > >> > I've hit a b

Re: Giving up for now

2009-05-02 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Joel Holdsworth wrote: > On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 20:38 +0200, Roderick Colenbrander wrote: >> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Joel Holdsworth >> wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > I've hit a bit of a wall with alpha blended icons. CreateIcon is working >> > fine for icon

Re: Severity levels

2009-05-02 Thread Rosanne DiMesio
On Sat, 2 May 2009 21:08:23 +0200 Nicklas Börjesson wrote: > > Non-technical? Posting on and following the wine-devel list? Severity levels > perfectly clear? > I must say, you've got some serious credibility issues.. :-) > > I think "middle-aged college English teacher who couldn't code if

Re: Severity levels

2009-05-02 Thread Austin English
2009/5/2 Nicklas Börjesson : > Not applications, issues. > My point is that user experience issues gets a lower severity than they > should. > Let's take photoshop CS 4 with two old but relevant actual issues as an > example. > 1. There is a problem with the text tool functionality, it did not wo

RE: Question about my user32 tests patch

2009-05-02 Thread Ge van Geldorp
Hi Joel, > From: Joel Holdsworth > > How do you deal with this problem, because presumably not every test > contributor has VMs ready to confirm the behaviour of 95, 98, ME, 2000, > XP and Vista. Do I submit the patch as-is, in the knowlege that it will > cause failures in old windows? Presumably

Re: Giving up for now

2009-05-02 Thread Joel Holdsworth
On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 20:38 +0200, Roderick Colenbrander wrote: > On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Joel Holdsworth > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I've hit a bit of a wall with alpha blended icons. CreateIcon is working > > fine for icon creation, but ExtractIcon and LoadIconFromResource etc. > > are

Re: Severity levels

2009-05-02 Thread Austin English
2009/5/2 Nicklas Börjesson : >>Wine is meant to support _ALL_ windows applications. It doesn't give >>priority to 'server' or 'desktop' applications (there is no >>difference, really), but instead tries to make all of them work. > > Yes, but I wasn't talking about server applikations per se, but th

Re: Giving up for now

2009-05-02 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Joel Holdsworth wrote: > Hi All, > > I've hit a bit of a wall with alpha blended icons. CreateIcon is working > fine for icon creation, but ExtractIcon and LoadIconFromResource etc. > are all proving more of a problem. All of these use various GDI DIB > functions to

Re: Severity levels

2009-05-02 Thread Austin English
2009/5/1 Nicklas Börjesson : > Current severity levels are perfect for server applications where everything > is simply about functionality working or not working. > However, the overwhelming majority of windows applications in general, and > those being ported through wine in particular are GUI-

Re: Implement gdiplus.dll.GdipSetPathGradientPresetBlend

2009-05-02 Thread Vincent Povirk
> +GpStatus WINGDIPAPI GdipSetPathGradientPresetBlend(GpPathGradient *brush, > GDIPCONST REAL *blend, > +    GDIPCONST REAL *pos, INT count) The types here don't match MSDN: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms534047(VS.85).aspx

FYI: First running winelib64-port!!!

2009-05-02 Thread André Hentschel
Hi, afer playing around with about 20 source-codes of open-source-project it got one compiled as winelib64-app(and also as 32-Bit winelib-app). It is WinVi 2.99 (http://www.winvi.de). The only difference i found between the original build and my two winelib builds are some GUI-specific things.

Re: Severity levels

2009-05-02 Thread Rosanne DiMesio
> > This is way easier to understand for normal people. Speaking as a non-technical user who does file bug reports now and then, I have always found the definitions of the severity levels to be perfectly clear, even when I was new to Wine, and from what I've seen, when a reporter sets the wr

Giving up for now

2009-05-02 Thread Joel Holdsworth
Hi All, I've hit a bit of a wall with alpha blended icons. CreateIcon is working fine for icon creation, but ExtractIcon and LoadIconFromResource etc. are all proving more of a problem. All of these use various GDI DIB functions to coerce the icon bitmap to the correct colour depth and size. The p

Re: Question about my user32 tests patch

2009-05-02 Thread Joel Holdsworth
On Sat, 2009-05-02 at 08:58 -0700, Juan Lang wrote: > Hi Joel, > > > How do you deal with this problem, because presumably not every test > > contributor has VMs ready to confirm the behaviour of 95, 98, ME, 2000, > > XP and Vista. Do I submit the patch as-is, in the knowlege that it will > > caus

Re: Question about my user32 tests patch

2009-05-02 Thread Juan Lang
Hi Joel, > How do you deal with this problem, because presumably not every test > contributor has VMs ready to confirm the behaviour of 95, 98, ME, 2000, > XP and Vista. Do I submit the patch as-is, in the knowlege that it will > cause failures in old windows? Presumably not - so what do you sugge

Re: Severity levels

2009-05-02 Thread Ken Sharp
Nicklas Börjesson wrote: I am not sure that common sense is the issue. I think it is a question of who you are and what you know. Among the ones submitting bugs now is a quickly rising percentage of normal-to-advanced end users, and that percentage is likely to rise even further, as Linux adopt

Re: FYI: 64-Bit Winelib-compilation

2009-05-02 Thread André Hentschel
Austin English schrieb: 2009/5/1 André Hentschel : To my suprise it didnt run. Interesting...does it run as a 32-bit winelib app? Have you tried compiling it with 64-bit mingw and seeing if it works there? i have problems compiling it with mingw64, because i am not familiar with i

Re: [shell32] stub for ExtractVersionResource16W

2009-05-02 Thread Stefan Leichter
Am Saturday 02 May 2009 12:54:14 schrieb Dmitry Timoshkov: > "Stefan Leichter" wrote: > > +/*** > > + * ExtractVersionResource16W (SHELL32.@) > > + */ > > +BOOL WINAPI ExtractVersionResource16W(LPWSTR s, DWORD d) { >

Re: Severity levels

2009-05-02 Thread Ken Sharp
The severity levels are there for guidance. I would hope that common sense would prevail, but clearly it doesn't. If a UI glitch makes a program unusable, then it's normal. I can not believe you need this pointing out to you. http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1347 "Screen is wiped/blan

Question about my user32 tests patch

2009-05-02 Thread Joel Holdsworth
Hi All, I just submitted my first ever patch to wine-patches (attached) - good news. In retrospect I may have been a little premature. The patch adds tests for user32:DrawIcon and user32:DrawIconEx including tests for icon alpha blending which wine does not currently support. It occured to me tha

Re: [shell32] stub for ExtractVersionResource16W

2009-05-02 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Stefan Leichter" wrote: +/*** + * ExtractVersionResource16W (SHELL32.@) + */ +BOOL WINAPI ExtractVersionResource16W(LPWSTR s, DWORD d) { +FIXME("(%s %x) stub!\n", debugstr_w(s), d); +return FALSE; +} Ple

Re: Severity levels

2009-05-02 Thread Jerome Leclanche
Outside Major/Critical/Enhancement, I don't think severity useful, to be honest. Problem is, more often than not, a minor implementation glitch can result into an application breaking all around if it relies on it a lot. Which is pretty much the case with photoshop at the moment. Maybe it should be

Severity levels

2009-05-02 Thread Nicklas Börjesson
Hi all! First, I couldn't find any list more suitable than this one to comment the severity levels in the bug reporting so I post it here. If this was a really bad thing to do, please tell me were to do so. Secondly, don't take this wrong, I am not here to preach, I actually think this is a se