Ben Klein wrote:
2009/4/17 Austin English :
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
The Ubuntu Studio logos look fine.
I'd be happy with adopting them if they really make Wine
fit in better with modern desktops. No need to wait for 1.2,
just check 'em in now, 1.2 will be along soon
n Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Guy Albertelli wrote:
> mountmgr.sys uses a specific format for "unique volume name". Make
> GetVolumeNameForVolumeMountPointW match that format for the returned
> unique volume name.
>
> Changelog
> - Make GetVolumeNameForVolumeMountPointW match mountmgr.sys for
2009/4/17 Austin English :
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>> The Ubuntu Studio logos look fine.
>> I'd be happy with adopting them if they really make Wine
>> fit in better with modern desktops. No need to wait for 1.2,
>> just check 'em in now, 1.2 will be along soon enough
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> The Ubuntu Studio logos look fine.
> I'd be happy with adopting them if they really make Wine
> fit in better with modern desktops. No need to wait for 1.2,
> just check 'em in now, 1.2 will be along soon enough.
>
>
>
+1
--
-Austin
If it is mostly automated spam, it might help to try and confuse the
scripts by inserting traps for them that users can't see (fields
hidden via CSS, etc...)
http://jkroon.blogs.uls.co.za/it/spam/ahead-of-the-spammers-for-once
Human spammers are a totally different issue... And most solutions
that
The Ubuntu Studio logos look fine.
I'd be happy with adopting them if they really make Wine
fit in better with modern desktops. No need to wait for 1.2,
just check 'em in now, 1.2 will be along soon enough.
On Mi, 2009-04-15 at 10:13 +0300, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
> I just have struck one tool related to Windows printer drivers [*]:
> [*] http://unixwiz.net/tools/winprinfo.html
Thanks for your Post.
I know that tool, but i wrote my own API test tool before I found
winprinfo.
My tool allows me to c
On Mi, 2009-04-15 at 13:37 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
> The lstrcpyW and lstrcatW additions to init() in the tests don't work on
> Win95. I guess that's where the new failures come from:
I removed a "broken(hres == VARCMP_GT)", and that's what
VarCmp on your w95 machine returned.
My second Pat
Scott Ritchie wrote:
Meanwhile, I'll try drumming up some artists to see if I can get a few
different Tango-compliant icons for us to chose from.
Apparently my work has already been done! There are some beautiful
icons originally made for Ubuntu Studio that have give me everything I
asked
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Ben Klein wrote:
> Seems like a lot of fuss over a few trivial details:
> 1) The Wine system icon is ugly (I'm all in favour of changing it, but
> you make a BIG fuss over it)
> 2) If the icon is changed, it should be done in time for Ubuntu 9.10.
> (I have BIG iss
2009/4/17 Scott Ritchie :
> A user submitted a bug report to launchpad complaining that the Wine icon is
> not Tango compliant:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine/+bug/358645
>
> So, what is Tango Compliance? Well, the Tango icons all use a set of design
> standards, and you can find
I mentioned this issue before - and I agree. Personally I'm interested
in good integration across the whole of Wine - this includes for example
the icons which appear in the file dialogs. ReactOS have adopted Tango
to great effect.
The downside is that there's really no way of making Wine's icons
2009/4/15 Dan Kegel :
> Two chromium unit tests reported phony errors
> when run on wine on valgrind because
> RtlAllocateHeap sometimes returned an
> allocation without notifying valgrind about it.
RtlReAllocateHeap is also missing valgrind notifications for the large
block paths. It also appears
A user submitted a bug report to launchpad complaining that the Wine
icon is not Tango compliant:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine/+bug/358645
So, what is Tango Compliance? Well, the Tango icons all use a set of
design standards, and you can find them here:
http://tango.freedes
2009/4/16 Scott Ritchie :
> Ubuntu 9.04's new notification system is really nice and non obtrusive,
> however it can still get in the way if you need the entire screen.
> Accordingly, the notifications system has been designed to not draw
> notifications when a program such as a movie player is tel
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:44:30AM -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> Ubuntu 9.04's new notification system is really nice and non obtrusive,
> however it can still get in the way if you need the entire screen.
> Accordingly, the notifications system has been designed to not draw
> notifications when
Ubuntu 9.04's new notification system is really nice and non obtrusive,
however it can still get in the way if you need the entire screen.
Accordingly, the notifications system has been designed to not draw
notifications when a program such as a movie player is telling the
operating system to s
Paul Vriens wrote:
Austin English wrote:
Testing for bug 18071. Passes under Wine/2k.
We bail out on pObjectName being NULL:
+if (!pObjectName || !ppSecurityDescriptor) return
ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER;
+
This m
Austin English wrote:
Testing for bug 18071. Passes under Wine/2k.
We bail out on pObjectName being NULL:
+if (!pObjectName || !ppSecurityDescriptor) return
ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER;
+
This means this if() right
2009/4/16 Francois Gouget :
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Ben Klein wrote:
>> But his bug raises an interesting issue. If an application has sanity
>> checks on FAT32 vs NTFS (e.g., I need a 4GB file ... I've detected no
>> NTFS therefore it's FAT32 which doesn't support more than 2GB files),
> Then the
André Hentschel wrote:
Ok, corrected that.
But where to go with the test case? create a new testfile for iconcache?
Sure, why not, if no relevant file exists already to place it in.
Ok, corrected that.
But where to go with the test case? create a new testfile for iconcache?
Nikolay Sivov schrieb:
André Hentschel wrote:
This is needed to bring up IE8. Otherwise there is a Backtrace:
=>0 0x7e80198d SHDefExtractIconW+0x7d(pszIconFile=0x32e310, iIndex=0,
uFlags=0, phiconLarg
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Ben Klein wrote:
> [...]
>> But his bug raises an interesting issue. If an application has sanity
>> checks on FAT32 vs NTFS (e.g., I need a 4GB file ... I've detected no
>> NTFS therefore it's FAT32 which doesn't suppor
André Hentschel wrote:
This is needed to bring up IE8. Otherwise there is a Backtrace:
=>0 0x7e80198d SHDefExtractIconW+0x7d(pszIconFile=0x32e310, iIndex=0,
uFlags=0, phiconLarge=(nil), phiconSmall=0x32e30c, nIconSize=1048592)
---
dlls/shell32/iconcache.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 inser
Jeremy Newman wrote:
> I changed the text question on the signup page. That should help a little.
>
Well that didn't help for long.
Vitaliy.
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:19:05 +0200 (CEST)
Francois Gouget wrote:
>
> Maybe the DVD Shrink author would agree to do this change if asked?
>
Development of DVD Shrink was halted in 2005 due to DMCA issues.
--
Rosanne DiMesio
Jesse Allen ha scritto:
What about other drivers? Is the DIB driver going to know how to
handle the others then?
The engine act as a filter between gdi32 and the DISPLAY driver, other stuffs
are untouched.
The changes on gdi32 are just to "prefere" the loading of the engine instead of
nor
Frans Kool wrote:
You're mixing tabs and spaces.
--
Cheers,
Paul.
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009, Chris Robinson wrote:
[...]
> Available fs mount points:
> / -> /dev/sda3
> /home -> /dev/sda4
> /boot -> /dev/sda1
> /mnt/cdrom -> /dev/hda1
>
> Matching mount points that /home/user/.wine/drive_c exists in and are active:
> /
> /home
>
> Mount point with the longest name:
>
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Ben Klein wrote:
[...]
> But his bug raises an interesting issue. If an application has sanity
> checks on FAT32 vs NTFS (e.g., I need a 4GB file ... I've detected no
> NTFS therefore it's FAT32 which doesn't support more than 2GB files),
Then the application is buggy: NTFS is
30 matches
Mail list logo
