Re: Re : [4/4] (Try4) msi/tests: Fix package test when run on root drive directory.

2009/4/13 James McKenzie : > Nicolas Le Cam wrote: >> 2009/4/13 James McKenzie : >> >>> Nicolas Le Cam wrote: >>> James, Here are updated patches for part 3 & 4 of my previous patch set. Tell me if you think I could submit them to wine-patches. For patch 3, the only to

Re: Re : [4/4] (Try4) msi/tests: Fix package test when run on root drive directory.

Nicolas Le Cam wrote: > 2009/4/13 James McKenzie : > >> Nicolas Le Cam wrote: >> >>> James, >>> >>> Here are updated patches for part 3 & 4 of my previous patch set. Tell >>> me if you think I could submit them to wine-patches. >>> >>> For patch 3, the only todo_wine is when launched from r

Re: Re : [4/4] (Try4) msi/tests: Fix package test when run on root drive directory.

2009/4/13 James McKenzie : > Nicolas Le Cam wrote: >> James, >> >> Here are updated patches for part 3 & 4 of my previous patch set. Tell >> me if you think I could submit them to wine-patches. >> >> For patch 3, the only todo_wine is when launched from root drive dir >> as explained in my previous

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

Vitaliy Margolen wrote: > chris ahrendt wrote: > >> Vitaliy Margolen wrote: >> >>> chris ahrendt wrote: >>> >>> 17997 Gecko is installed and reran test... same result... valid bug 17998 is the locking issue... and it occurs not just in the rest but in another ap

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

Ben Klein wrote: > 2009/4/13 chris ahrendt : > >> Vincent Povirk wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Ben Klein wrote: >>> 2009/4/13 Vincent Povirk : > But the description doesn't say "invalid conditions". It says "serious > errors in Wine". That

Re: Setting working directories for applications?

> Currently wine can't launch .lnk files. I was wrong: wine start /path/to/lnk.lnk -- Igor

Re: wininet: Add tests for asynchronous HttpSendRequestEx/HttpEndRequest.

2009/4/11 Hans Leidekker : > On Saturday 11 April 2009 15:20:06 Nicolas Le Cam wrote: > >> Is there no way to avoid use of cached connections or to clean the >> cache before those two tests ? >> Perhaps moving both tests up and down instead of sleeping at end of >> them could help. > > I looked for

Re: Setting working directories for applications?

2009/4/12 James McKenzie : > The problem is that you are technically working in Windows and the > working directory may need to be set in the registry. Why? And where? Working directory in cases I've seen is specified in .lnk file. Wikipedia: "Generally the effect of double-clicking a shortcut is

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

2009/4/13 chris ahrendt : > Vincent Povirk wrote: >> >> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Ben Klein wrote: >>> >>> 2009/4/13 Vincent Povirk : But the description doesn't say "invalid conditions". It says "serious errors in Wine". That's something that should never happen in tests, >>

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Ben Klein wrote: > 2009/4/13 Vincent Povirk : >> But the description doesn't say "invalid conditions". It says "serious >> errors in Wine". That's something that should never happen in tests, >> as it would imply that the state of the libraries we're testing (and >

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

> chris ahrendt wrote: > > 17997 Gecko is installed and reran test... same result... valid bug My guess is Gecko didn't install right. > 17998 is the locking issue... and it occurs not just in the rest but in > another application as well.. Bug in application, not in Wine. Application: "Lock thi

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote: > Vincent Povirk wrote: >> Ok, but my point is (and I'm not saying we should necessarily do >> this), according to the Wine Developer's Guide an err is something >> that we should be concerned about, by definition. If we buy this, and >> som

Re: Re : [4/4] (Try4) msi/tests: Fix package test when run on root drive directory.

James, Here are updated patches for part 3 & 4 of my previous patch set. Tell me if you think I could submit them to wine-patches. For patch 3, the only todo_wine is when launched from root drive dir as explained in my previous mail. For patch 4, I skip a test if test is executed on root drive di

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

chris ahrendt wrote: > Vitaliy Margolen wrote: >> chris ahrendt wrote: >> >>> 17997 Gecko is installed and reran test... same result... valid bug >>> >>> 17998 is the locking issue... and it occurs not just in the rest but in >>> another application as well.. >>> >> >> What errors? What exac

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

James McKenzie wrote: > Of course, implementing the linker may be a project in itself. It's already implemented. It only works from AppDB. It would be nice to have it working from Bugzilla. Vitaliy

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

Vincent Povirk wrote: > Ok, but my point is (and I'm not saying we should necessarily do > this), according to the Wine Developer's Guide an err is something > that we should be concerned about, by definition. If we buy this, and > some current err messages are often harmless, implying no loss of >

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

2009/4/12 James McKenzie : > I understand your concern.  I like bug reports, I just don't like bug > reports in a vacuum.  If we can get some of the functionality of an > automatic Bugzilla to Applications Database linker in place this would > make it much easier to avoid (not prevent) duplicate r

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

Vincent Povirk wrote: > On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Vitaliy Margolen > wrote: > > Ok, but my point is (and I'm not saying we should necessarily do > this), according to the Wine Developer's Guide an err is something > that we should be concerned about, by definition. If we buy this, and >

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

David Gerard wrote: > 2009/4/12 James McKenzie : > > >> Bugzilla should request an application name and AppDB entry number. >> > > > Demanding an appID number will certainly keep the bug reports down, > though at the expense of bug reporting. > The idea is that not all users look into Bu

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote: >> I'm not sure about the opengl error. It could mean that some display >> driver is offering some render_type flags which I'm not handling yet. >> That can also cause issues. >> >> err:wgl:get_render_type_from_fbconfig Unknown render_type:

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

2009/4/12 James McKenzie : > Bugzilla should request an application name and AppDB entry number. Demanding an appID number will certainly keep the bug reports down, though at the expense of bug reporting. I can't see making bug reports arbitrarily more difficult as a good way for devs to get an

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

Vitaliy Margolen wrote: > chris ahrendt wrote: > >> 17997 Gecko is installed and reran test... same result... valid bug >> >> 17998 is the locking issue... and it occurs not just in the rest but in >> another application as well.. >> > > What errors? What exactly isn't working for you? You

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

Roderick Colenbrander wrote: > On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Vitaliy Margolen > mailto:wine-de...@kievinfo.com>> wrote: > > Vincent Povirk wrote: > > Chris Ahrendt filed a few bugs recently for "err" messages encountered > > during test runs (17997 and 17998 at least). > > >

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

chris ahrendt wrote: > 17997 Gecko is installed and reran test... same result... valid bug > > 17998 is the locking issue... and it occurs not just in the rest but in > another application as well.. What errors? What exactly isn't working for you? You have failed to explain that. Until you meanin

Re: Setting working directories for applications?

Igor Tarasov wrote: > Hi Jeff > > >> There is Wine's start.exe which takes a /Unix option to start the >> supplied file in unix path form, which both sets the working directory >> and provides the commandline double quoting quirk which Windows >> Explorer does. So, instead of cd ~/.wine/drive_c

Re: Re : [4/4] (Try4) msi/tests: Fix package test when run on root drive directory.

2009/4/12 James McKenzie : > Nicolas Le Cam wrote: >> 2009/4/11 Ben Klein : >> >>> 2009/4/11 Nicolas Le Cam : >>> 2009/4/11 James Hawkins : Let met explain : Running test on wine in folder C:\test : works (expected "C:\test" got "C:\test") Running test on wine in folde

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

Vincent Povirk wrote: > Chris Ahrendt filed a few bugs recently for "err" messages encountered > during test runs (17997 and 17998 at least). > 17997 is a bogus report - Gecko is not intalled. Nothing actually failed. 17998 is the same. Only I let our resident 3D gurus to respond. I don't see any

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

2009/4/13 Tobias Jakobi : > Let's repeat this once again: The ERRs he mentions have nothing to do > with the initial problem described in the report (the MP2 one). I was going to repeat this, both on this thread and on the MP2 bug where he posted saying "you don't need MP to reproduce any more" (w

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

It's either the handling of zero times +infty or the handling of NaN (how is NaN mapped to a RGBA vector?). OpenGL and D3D do seems to have different opinions on how this should be done. On OpenGL there is no word in the standard how it should be done, so it's essentially undefined behaviour. The

Re: [5/8] WineD3D: Add a more formal framework for driver quirks

2009/4/12 Stefan Dösinger : > I accidentally deleted the mail in my inbox, so that reply is without a proper > in-reply-to tag. Here's the archive for reference: > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-April/074718.html > >> - I don't like how much information specific to constant fixups

Re: [5/8] WineD3D: Add a more formal framework for driver quirks

I accidentally deleted the mail in my inbox, so that reply is without a proper in-reply-to tag. Here's the archive for reference: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-April/074718.html > - I don't like how much information specific to constant fixups the > table contains. There is a l

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

Vincent Povirk wrote: On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:49 PM, chris ahrendt wrote: So in the case of the multiple locks and err's the output of the test run is the same for bug 7284 then this bug or output would be invalid as well? The bug descr

Re: do ERR messages imply bugs?

Ben Klein wrote: 2009/4/12 Vincent Povirk : Chris Ahrendt filed a few bugs recently for "err" messages encountered during test runs (17997 and 17998 at least). Vitaliy claims they are invalid. 17997 looks invalid due to missing Wine Gecko. 17998 looks like uncleanliness in the test t

Re: Setting working directories for applications?

On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 11:29:06 +0500, you wrote: >Currently the only way to lauch such applications is either to use >terminal and cd to working directory and then run application, or >create custom bash launcher, Third option: In the existing launcher instead of: wine "X:\pathto\program.exe"

Re: Setting working directories for applications?

Hi Jeff > There is Wine's start.exe which takes a /Unix option to start the > supplied file in unix path form, which both sets the working directory > and provides the commandline double quoting quirk which Windows > Explorer does.  So, instead of cd ~/.wine/drive_c/foo && wine bar.exe, > you can

Re: Setting working directories for applications?

On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Igor Tarasov wrote: > Hello. > > This might be a known issue, but anyway: Some windows applications > need that shortcut (launcher) have working directory set, and that > working directory sometimes different from where the .exe is located. > > In Linux, with gnome