On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Ben Klein wrote:
> 2009/2/26 King InuYasha :
>> Also, NTFS DOES have a concept of execute bits, but Windows itself does not
>> use them. An implementation of this is the "trusted" app scheme in the
>> properties in Windows Vista and above (I don't remember if XPSP2
Attached are some cursor patches I have been working on. These
patches store the cursor in the wineserver, clean up user32 a little
bit, draw .ani cursors more completely, and ultimately implement
themed cursors. I am sending them here for some last review (big
thanks to Henri for taking some tim
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
> There have been plenty of cases in #winehq where users have some
> problem with 1.0.1 (Warcraft 3 appears to be a popular candidate).
> When they upgrade to 1.1.15, suddenly it starts working. Are there
> even any winehq-supplied binary packages
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Austin English wrote:
> Not sure if it matters for .rc files, but you're using spaces whereas
> the earlier entries are using tabs.
I know. I hate them.
Anyway, the even earlier entries are using spaces.
2009/2/25 Vincent Povirk :
> Fixes bug 17485.
>
> Vincent Povirk
>
>
>
>
diff --git a/dlls/shell32/shell32_En.rc b/dlls/shell32/shell32_En.rc
index f752e6d..d7fa7c3 100644
--- a/dlls/shell32/shell32_En.rc
+++ b/dlls/shell32/shell32_En.rc
@@ -282,6 +282,8 @@ STRINGTABLE
IDS_CPANEL_TITLE
Ben Klein wrote:
> 2009/2/26 Dan Kegel :
>> Our currently released version is 1.0, but the appdb's
>> browse feature acts as if that version no longer exists.
>> This will seriously confuse newcomers who are using
>> the 1.0.1 version (e.g. anybody who installs a fresh
>> copy of Ubuntu!).
>>
>> To
2009/2/26 King InuYasha :
> So, in theory, Wine could simply run itself on top of Linux (basically a
> ReactOS desktop on top of Linux instead of the NT kernel) and work just like
> Windows because it operates in a native app style? Granted, that probably
> would require quite a bit of tweaking to
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Ben Klein wrote:
> It's a compatibility layer. It doesn't actually interpret individual
> instructions. As described earlier, Wine sets up an environment
> suitable for the Windows apps to run in (which is primarily
> *implementations* of win32 calls that "translat
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
> 2009/2/26 King InuYasha :
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
> >>
> >> 2009/2/26 King InuYasha :
> >> > Now that Nautilus has the desktop file requiring execute bit, I have a
> >> > question for all of you to consider. Do JAR
2009/2/26 King InuYasha :
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
>>
>> 2009/2/26 King InuYasha :
>> > Now that Nautilus has the desktop file requiring execute bit, I have a
>> > question for all of you to consider. Do JAR files require the +x bit to
>> > load
>> > them, or are they tr
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
> 2009/2/26 King InuYasha :
> > Now that Nautilus has the desktop file requiring execute bit, I have a
> > question for all of you to consider. Do JAR files require the +x bit to
> load
> > them, or are they treated like associated files and run t
2009/2/26 King InuYasha :
> Now that Nautilus has the desktop file requiring execute bit, I have a
> question for all of you to consider. Do JAR files require the +x bit to load
> them, or are they treated like associated files and run through the
> interpreter? Really, Windows apps on Linux is bas
2009/2/26 Dan Kegel :
> Our currently released version is 1.0, but the appdb's
> browse feature acts as if that version no longer exists.
> This will seriously confuse newcomers who are using
> the 1.0.1 version (e.g. anybody who installs a fresh
> copy of Ubuntu!).
>
> To fix this, we should add 1
I'm connecting to a Saris PowerTap 2.4SL bike computer, but really
it's a usb cradle using a standard FTDI chip. The device enumerates
and works fine as a ttyUSB device under Linux. I have gotten closer
to the root of this problem, and I now see why EV_RXFLAG was never
implemented in Wine. I'll
Chris Robinson wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 February 2009 8:57:23 pm Scott Ritchie wrote:
>> Worse, you could actively irritate them - suppose they do double click
>> and you DONT offer the ability to open it, but instead instruct them to
>> go through that annoying procedure.
>
> It's hardly annoying a
Dan Kegel wrote:
> I can't get pages from http://wiki.winehq.org,
> though I can ping lattica.ca.
> The web server there seems to close connections
> after a long pause without any response.
>
> it looks like the wiki server needs restarting?
Works again after Dimi rebooted the server.
bye
m
I can't get pages from http://wiki.winehq.org,
though I can ping lattica.ca.
The web server there seems to close connections
after a long pause without any response.
it looks like the wiki server needs restarting?
Our currently released version is 1.0, but the appdb's
browse feature acts as if that version no longer exists.
This will seriously confuse newcomers who are using
the 1.0.1 version (e.g. anybody who installs a fresh
copy of Ubuntu!).
To fix this, we should add 1.0 (or 1.0.1) back into the search
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 9:22:29 am Vincent Povirk wrote:
> This discussion has been assuming that .exe files are somehow special
> because they are programs
Actually, I'm saying just the opposite. They are *not* special because they
are programs, and should honor the executable bit just lik
Paul Vriens wrote:
> Juan Lang wrote:
>> --Juan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Hi Juan,
>
> The first 4 changes are not correct. Win9x returns TRUE (1) here.
>
Well actually the first two on Win95 and the last two on Win95/Win98.
--
Che
Juan Lang wrote:
> --Juan
>
>
>
>
>
Hi Juan,
The first 4 changes are not correct. Win9x returns TRUE (1) here.
--
Cheers,
Paul.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:38 AM, King InuYasha wrote:
> AFAIK, the main difference between the Wine and Java methods is
> that Wine doesn't sandbox its loading environment, while Java does.
Java doesn't create a sandbox when you run a normal application.
Which makes it a wonderful example.
Thi
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 8:38:15 am King InuYasha wrote:
> Now that Nautilus has the desktop file requiring execute bit, I have a
> question for all of you to consider. Do JAR files require the +x bit to
> load them, or are they treated like associated files and run through the
> interpreter?
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Johan Dahlin wrote:
> Dan Kegel wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Scott Ritchie
> wrote:
> >> When I brought this up at the Ubuntu Developer Summit a while back, the
> >> security conscious there wanted to check an executable for the execute
> >> bit be
Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Scott Ritchie wrote:
>> When I brought this up at the Ubuntu Developer Summit a while back, the
>> security conscious there wanted to check an executable for the execute
>> bit before launching it with Wine. Then, the user would be prompted if
>
2009/2/25 Paul Vriens :
> Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
>
> +
> + /* We have a dll that cannot be found through
> LoadLibraryExA.
> This
> + * is the case for .NET provided dll's. We will add the
> directory
> + * where the dll resides to t
Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
+
+/* We have a dll that cannot be found through
LoadLibraryExA.
This
+ * is the case for .NET provided dll's. We will add the
directory
+ * where the dll resides to the PATH variable when dealing
with
>>> +
>>> + /* We have a dll that cannot be found through
>>> LoadLibraryExA.
>>> This
>>> + * is the case for .NET provided dll's. We will add the
>>> directory
>>> + * where the dll resides to the PATH variable when dealing
>>> with
>>> + * the tests
Hello Dylan,
please do not add the English strings for stringtable resources that
aren't broken (here the Hungarian translation). It makes it hard to
automatically detect (http://www.mikolaj.zalewski.pl/wine-transl/) if
the resource is translated or not.
Also you have fixed only the traditional C
Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
> Hi Paul, minor comments :
>
>> +static void append_path( const char *path)
>> +{
>> +char *newpath;
>> +
>> +newpath = xmalloc(strlen(curpath) + 1 + strlen(path) + 1);
>> +strcpy(newpath, curpath);
>> +strcat(newpath, ";");
>> +strcat(newpath, path);
>>
Hi Paul, minor comments :
> programs/winetest/main.c | 60
> +-
> 1 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/programs/winetest/main.c b/programs/winetest/main.c
> index 74a4307..58e520b 100644
> --- a/programs/winetest/main.c
>
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 8:57:23 pm Scott Ritchie wrote:
> It would also make it completely unusable. Remember, all downloaded
> executables (even intentionally downloaded ones) will be -x by default.
> Do you really expect users to go right
> click->properties->permissions->allow execution?
2009/2/24 Stefan Dösinger :
>
> +static void shader_glsl_gen_sample_code(const SHADER_OPCODE_ARG *arg, DWORD
> sampler, const char *coord_reg,
> +const glsl_sample_function_t
> *sample_function, const char *dst_swizzle,
> +
33 matches
Mail list logo
