I was hoping to demo aquamark 3, but it now crashes for
me on startup. Did I forget the magic incantation to run it successfully?
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=6616
2009/2/25 Scott Ritchie :
> Chris Robinson wrote:
>> On Tuesday 24 February 2009 6:07:08 pm Scott Ritchie wrote:
>>> When I brought this up at the Ubuntu Developer Summit a while back, the
>>> security conscious there wanted to check an executable for the execute
>>> bit before launching it with Wi
Not sure exactly where in the thread this fits in, but here goes
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:58 AM, Zachary Goldberg wrote:
> 2009/2/23 Dan Kegel :
>> Ben Klein wrote:
http://www.avertlabs.com/research/blog/index.php/2009/02/23/running-windows-malware-in-linux/
"Do not set the f
Chris Robinson wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 February 2009 6:07:08 pm Scott Ritchie wrote:
>> When I brought this up at the Ubuntu Developer Summit a while back, the
>> security conscious there wanted to check an executable for the execute
>> bit before launching it with Wine. Then, the user would be pro
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 6:07:08 pm Scott Ritchie wrote:
> When I brought this up at the Ubuntu Developer Summit a while back, the
> security conscious there wanted to check an executable for the execute
> bit before launching it with Wine. Then, the user would be prompted if
> they wanted to r
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> When I brought this up at the Ubuntu Developer Summit a while back, the
> security conscious there wanted to check an executable for the execute
> bit before launching it with Wine. Then, the user would be prompted if
> they wanted to run it
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 6:01:53 pm Marcel Partap wrote:
> Actually, nowadays there are most sophisticated technical solutions
> which mount on a single click. No warning, no options.
There are options. Whether or not said options are pre-configured sanely is
another question; but that's up to
Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Ben Klein wrote:
> http://www.avertlabs.com/research/blog/index.php/2009/02/23/running-windows-malware-in-linux/
>
> "Do not set the file association for Windows executables with Wine.
> This would enable running Windows executabl
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 5:51:59 pm Ben Klein wrote:
> Not correct. I've tested with vfat and ext2 filesystems, with noexec,
> and the files are still marked +x. As it turns out, noexec doesn't
> filter +x, just prevents shell/ld.so/kernel from loading the program.
> Wine is an indirect method o
On 25/02/09 02:35, Chris Robinson wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 February 2009 4:54:26 pm Ben Klein wrote:
>> "Unsolicited" files will get +x with default mount options on
vfat/fat
>> partitions, because ALL files on such partitions get +x this way.
>
> You have to mount a partition to get access t
2009/2/25 Chris Robinson :
> On Tuesday 24 February 2009 4:54:26 pm Ben Klein wrote:
>> "Unsolicited" files will get +x with default mount options on vfat/fat
>> partitions, because ALL files on such partitions get +x this way.
>
> You have to mount a partition to get access to its files. A partiti
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 4:54:26 pm Ben Klein wrote:
> "Unsolicited" files will get +x with default mount options on vfat/fat
> partitions, because ALL files on such partitions get +x this way.
You have to mount a partition to get access to its files. A partition normally
doesn't mount itself,
On 25/02/09 01:54, Ben Klein wrote:
> 2009/2/25 Chris Robinson:
>> On Tuesday 24 February 2009 3:46:53 pm Paul Chitescu wrote:
>>> My FAT partitions disable +x through file mode mount option since I don't
>>> want the kernel to attempt to identify and execute every unknown file I
>>> happen to
2009/2/25 Chris Robinson :
> On Tuesday 24 February 2009 3:46:53 pm Paul Chitescu wrote:
>> My FAT partitions disable +x through file mode mount option since I don't
>> want the kernel to attempt to identify and execute every unknown file I
>> happen to open/click/hit enter. On those partitions the
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 3:46:53 pm Paul Chitescu wrote:
> My FAT partitions disable +x through file mode mount option since I don't
> want the kernel to attempt to identify and execute every unknown file I
> happen to open/click/hit enter. On those partitions there are no POSIX
> executables bu
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 20:33:49 Chris Robinson wrote:
> On Monday 23 February 2009 5:14:20 pm Marcel Partap wrote:
> > The problem would be with one of the more common use case: trying to
> > start/install a program from an optical disc. The files will not be
> > marked +x and the directories
Stefan Dösinger wrote:
>
>
>
You forgot the patch ;)
--
Cheers,
Paul.
On Monday 23 February 2009 5:14:20 pm Marcel Partap wrote:
> The problem would be with one of the more common use case: trying to
> start/install a program from an optical disc. The files will not be
> marked +x and the directories not be writable.
They're +x for me. They're not writable, but they
Paul Bryan Roberts write:
> The code as it stands creates makefiles with a mode of 600. This may be
> benign on most (e.g. personal workstation) installations but not all.
>
>An example is where the wine git repository is located on an NFS
>volume. Here security settings may mean that root:root i
"Vincent Povirk" writes:
> +ILFree(This->pidl);
> +This->pidl = ILClone(pidl);
> +if (This->pidl)
> +return S_OK;
> +else
> +return E_OUTOFMEMORY;
You should check for success before you free the previous pidl.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
http://www.trustedsource.org/blog/186/Running-Windows-Malware-in-Linux
With apps like ZeroWine, we can I think expect to see Windows binaries
that try int 0x80 calls just because they might be useful and a Linux
box will make a much more robust host.
- d.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Ben Klein wrote:
> 2009/2/24 Damjan Jovanovic :
>> It generates an association from a file extension, to open with the
>> handler for its ProgID currently in the registry.
>>
>> So it allows .txt to open with Notepad and .dev to open with Dev-C++.
>> It does not ma
2009/2/22 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton :
> come on folks, pick up the ball. acknowledge that you're aware that
> there is an authoritative source of information on this
> horrendously-complex topic, in the form of nothing less than a fully
> functioning reference implementation.
I don't think a
Nicolas Le Cam wrote:
> 2009/2/24 Paul Vriens :
>> Hi,
>>
>> This makes sure that if we have a dll that's only provided via .NET it can
>> still
>> be found. Now both our extraction (and the generation of the subtest list)
>> and
>> the real test will find the dll.
>>
>> The downside (and hence thi
2009/2/24 Paul Vriens :
> Hi,
>
> This makes sure that if we have a dll that's only provided via .NET it can
> still
> be found. Now both our extraction (and the generation of the subtest list)
> and
> the real test will find the dll.
>
> The downside (and hence this is a bit hackish) is that we ex
2009/2/24 Ben Klein :
> 2009/2/24 Vit Hrachovy :
>> Mmmm. According to AppDB Runescape is said to work well in Wine ;)
>> That's another layer-within-layer - Runespace is an MMORPG written in
>> JAVA/OpenGL as browser-embedded application.
> Sounds like something that could work equally well nati
Ben Klein wrote:
> 2009/2/24 Vit Hrachovy :
>> Mmmm. According to AppDB Runescape is said to work well in Wine ;)
>> That's another layer-within-layer - Runespace is an MMORPG written in
>> JAVA/OpenGL as browser-embedded application.
>
> Sounds like something that could work equally well natively
2009/2/24 Vit Hrachovy :
> Mmmm. According to AppDB Runescape is said to work well in Wine ;)
> That's another layer-within-layer - Runespace is an MMORPG written in
> JAVA/OpenGL as browser-embedded application.
Sounds like something that could work equally well natively ...
ACK, I like it too :)
VirtualDesktop is one workaround, second is using 'xrandr -s 0' past
wine exit. As I have each game installed into individual WINEPREFIX,
I've got game start scripts in ~/bin that handle WINEDEBUG=-all before
start and 'xrandr -s 0' after exit.
Although, on Linux I usually
Vincent Povirk wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Paul Vriens
> wrote:
>> The reason you see this is because next to a normal LoadLibrary we also use
>> the
>> .NET variant. On some boxes gdiplus.dll cannot be found through LoadLibrary
>> but
>> will trough LoadLibraryShim. As winetest n
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 1:59 AM, Paul Bryan Roberts
wrote:
> Reference bug 14334 (WordPerfect Office 2002: Unable to Install)
>
> Use of breakpoints in a debugger under WindowsTM has shown that
> GetNamedSecurityInfoExA is called during a normal installation. From
> this we infer that some kind o
2009/2/24 Damjan Jovanovic :
> It generates an association from a file extension, to open with the
> handler for its ProgID currently in the registry.
>
> So it allows .txt to open with Notepad and .dev to open with Dev-C++.
> It does not make Wine open a new .exe by default - at least, that was
>
32 matches
Mail list logo
