On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Alan Feldman wrote:
> Ouch Austin. But thanks Ricardo for explaining to Austin that I wasn't
> actually contributing "code" and I also didn't use any reverse
> engineering to come up with that discovery.
Didn't mean for it come off as harsh. I know that wasn't cod
Ouch Austin. But thanks Ricardo for explaining to Austin that I wasn't
actually contributing "code" and I also didn't use any reverse
engineering to come up with that discovery.
All I did was go to Microsoft's MSDN Libary web site and compare the
Toolbar messages listed there with the "publicly av
although he used disassembly to check our implementation, he gave msdn proof
for the notifications he talked about...
and didn't contribute code.
> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 08:45:43 -0600
> From: austinengl...@gmail.com
> To: alanf...@gmail.com
> Subject: R
Hi Dan,
I found winetricks very helpful ! Thank you for this very nice
script ;).
Could you please add glut [1] to the packages winetricks knows about ?
Thank you very much,
Couannette
[1] http://www.opengl.org/resources/libraries/glut/glut_downloads.php
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:51:13PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> you wrote
>> Depends on my previous patch: winhttp/tests:...
> The way we usually express that is to prefix each patch
> with its position in the series of patches. For instance,
> your two-patch series might have used subjec
Christian Costa writes:
>> There's no reason to rename the parameter, 'flags' is a perfectly good
>> name.
>>
> It was just to reflect more the MSDN. Maybe it's not that usefull.
No it's not, MSDN uses the stupid Hungarian notation everywhere, and we
should stay as far away as possible from t
Alexandre Julliard a écrit :
> Christian Costa writes:
>
>
>> -MMRESULT WINAPI joyConfigChanged(DWORD flags)
>> +MMRESULT WINAPI joyConfigChanged(DWORD dwFlags)
>> {
>> -FIXME("(%x) - stub\n", flags);
>> +FIXME("(%x) - stub\n", dwFlags);
>> +
>> +if (dwFlags)
>> +return JOY
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Roderick Colenbrander
wrote:
> Cygwin/Mingw doesn't work due to missing functionality for wineserver I
> believe (not sure what). Someone recently claimed that he indeed had wine
> working on Interix on a 32-bit WinXP. Right now he was trying to compile it
> on
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 3:49 AM, Alan Feldman wrote:
> Hello Wine developers,
>
> I am writing to this forum because I wanted to contribute some useful
> development information to your community while at the same time not
> have to get too involved as I currently have no plans to stay involved
>
Christian Costa writes:
> -MMRESULT WINAPI joyConfigChanged(DWORD flags)
> +MMRESULT WINAPI joyConfigChanged(DWORD dwFlags)
> {
> -FIXME("(%x) - stub\n", flags);
> +FIXME("(%x) - stub\n", dwFlags);
> +
> +if (dwFlags)
> +return JOYERR_PARMS;
There's no reason to rename the p
Gerald Pfeifer writes:
> The current version likely is actually broken since the ! operator has
> a higher priority than bitwise & in C. Unless someone really wanted to
> use a very, hmm, unusual construct here?
No, it's clearly not intended, but fixing this breaks the tests, this
would need to
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 10:21:29AM +0100, Kai Blin wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 December 2008 23:55:56 Dan Kegel wrote:
> > http://enquiringmimes.com/wp/2008/12/30/a-rumor-we-hope-is-true/
> > said
> > "WINE is the famous, this-would-be-so-cool-if-it-only-actually-worked
> > way of running Windows on oth
Hello Wine developers,
I am writing to this forum because I wanted to contribute some useful
development information to your community while at the same time not
have to get too involved as I currently have no plans to stay involved
going forward.
I wanted to say that I am *really* impressed with
On Tuesday 30 December 2008 23:55:56 Dan Kegel wrote:
> http://enquiringmimes.com/wp/2008/12/30/a-rumor-we-hope-is-true/
> said
> "WINE is the famous, this-would-be-so-cool-if-it-only-actually-worked
> way of running Windows on other platforms without needing Windows,
> kind of like how useful it m
14 matches
Mail list logo
