"Maarten Lankhorst" wrote:
> Needed to get +relay working in wine64
You should have used CDECL instead of __cdecl, have a look how it's
done in msvcrt.dll.
--
Dmitry.
Sander Devrieze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the reasons why Linux distributions do not want to include Wine
> by default is because compatibility issues may result a bad impression
> of the quality of the OS. Users think Linux sucks because their
> Windows application does not run (as good) under Wine
2008/12/16 Sander Devrieze :
> Hi,
>
> One of the reasons why Linux distributions do not want to include Wine
> by default is because compatibility issues may result a bad impression
> of the quality of the OS. Users think Linux sucks because their
> Windows application does not run (as good) under
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Michael Pujos
wrote:
> The protocol is slightly changed between read_changes_apc() in ntdll and the
> server
> to support return of multiple FILE_NOTIFY_INFORMATION structs at a time.
> This is transparent to win32 programs (is that what you are calling client ?
>
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Michael Pujos
wrote:
>> I don't see an attachment to
>> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-December/066224.html
>> or rather, there's only a zero-length one.
>
> I just attached (In thunderbird) the file outputted by "git format-patch
> --keep-subjec
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:58 AM, Andrew Fenn wrote:
> Shouldn't you take off the "hq" part of the name?
Indeed, I forgot to tell the arts team that.
> I don't know how exactly you could do what I am about to suggest, but
> is there a way to make the graphics tell a little more as to what wine
>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Andrew Fenn wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Ismael Barros² wrote:
>> Which model and T-shirt do you like better? Any suggestion to improve
>> them? Maybe in a future we can sell more than one Wine design, but
>> right now we'd rather offer only one, to
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Ismael Barros² wrote:
> Which model and T-shirt do you like better? Any suggestion to improve
> them? Maybe in a future we can sell more than one Wine design, but
> right now we'd rather offer only one, to avoid logistic problems.
Shouldn't you take off the "hq"
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:47 AM, Steven Edwards wrote:
> Heh sorry for all the spam, it would help if I used gmail for
> everything, in the original thread Jer already gave blanket permission
> for Wine to that logo:
>
> fromJeremy White
> to Dan Kegel
> cc Wine Developers List
> d
Hi,
One of the reasons why Linux distributions do not want to include Wine
by default is because compatibility issues may result a bad impression
of the quality of the OS. Users think Linux sucks because their
Windows application does not run (as good) under Wine as it does under
Windows.
Problem
Austin English wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Alasdair Sinclair
> wrote:
>
>> Austin English wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Zachary Goldberg
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
All,
It seems we have another machine which passes all tests on Wine
h
Christian Costa wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> BTW, if the vtable are removed, there may be some unused functions. Will
> they be removed as well ?
>
> Bye,
> Christian
Hi Christian,
Because I was mindful not to remove such things lightly, that is why I
sought feedback from the community, and I shall
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Aric Stewart wrote:
> Ok, Though it mirrors what is happening over in MSI_RecordGetStringW so i
> assumed it was just a few check that had been accidentally forgotten.
>
Yea, I'm sure it's right, but it's nice to verify those changes with
tests and to keep it fr
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Aric Stewart wrote:
> ---
> dlls/msi/record.c |7 ---
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
Can you add tests for this please?
Thanks,
James Hawkins
Ok, Though it mirrors what is happening over in MSI_RecordGetStringW so
i assumed it was just a few check that had been accidentally forgotten.
-aric
James Hawkins wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Aric Stewart wrote:
>> ---
>> dlls/msi/record.c |7 ---
>> 1 files changed, 4 i
Since the change to the new design, AppDB entries have been displaying either a
? (Firefox, Konqueror, Opera) or a blank rectangle (IE in Windows) in place of
a variety of special characters, including anything with an umlaut (bug 16514).
I've played around with it a bit, and the entries can be
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Alasdair Sinclair
wrote:
> Austin English wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Zachary Goldberg
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> It seems we have another machine which passes all tests on Wine
>>>
>>> http://test.winehq.org/data/bd25af9dba280e3d80f308014
Hi Patrick,
First of all, tests must pass on Wine and Windows. Your test won't pass
on any of them! When you have a test that passes on Windows, please send
one function implementation and tests in one patch.
Patrick Rudolph wrote:
> From c43e52c3446fb846a760002f0222f697075fad1b Mon Sep 17 00:0
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Nguyen wrote:
> This revision incorporates Jacek Caban's suggestions.
> ---
> dlls/jscript/string.c | 55 +++-
> dlls/jscript/tests/api.js | 17 ++
> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
+if(r
Hi Andrew,
BTW, if the vtable are removed, there may be some unused functions. Will they
be removed as well ?
Bye,
Christian
> Message du 16/12/08 11:11
> De : "Maarten Lankhorst"
> A : "Andrew Talbot"
> Copie à : wine-devel@winehq.org
> Objet : Re: Unused vtables and debug channels
>
>
>
Hello,
wineps.drv uses the postscript operator glyphshow to print glyphs. This
operator is very slow on all Kyocera postscript printers. To get an idea: its
generally only 1/6 to 1/10 of the performance compared to the same document
printed with the windows xp postscript driver (which does not
Am Dienstag, 16. Dezember 2008 11:51 schrieb Kai Blin:
> On Tuesday 16 December 2008 11:42:55 Wolfgang Walter wrote:
> > I have not received any comment yet.
>
> That's probably because not too many people know much about this. Detlef
> Riekenberg is probably the person who should comment on this,
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 11:42:55 Wolfgang Walter wrote:
> I have not received any comment yet.
That's probably because not too many people know much about this. Detlef
Riekenberg is probably the person who should comment on this, I've CCed him.
Cheers,
Kai
--
Kai Blin
WorldForge developer
Hello,
as I wrote clipping in wineps.drv has a bug. Wine does only consider the
clipping region and not the meta region. It should combine them. This is a
bug which hurts us with a real windows application.
I sent a patch which which corrects this.
My patch also addressed a general performance
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Austin English wrote:
>> What about clarifying the wording on
>> http://appdb.winehq.org/help/?sTopic=maintainer_ratings
>> ?
>> My suggestion for "Platinum":
>> "Application installs and runs flawlessly completely/at highest settings
>> 'out of the box'. No changes required i
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Talbot schreef:
> It appears that the following vtables and Wine debug channels are not being
> used, so I am considering removing them. Please let me know, therefore, if
> you have plans for any of them and want them kept.
>
>
> Vtables:
>
> MemInputPin_Vtbl
ByeongSik Jeon wrote:
> ---
> dlls/gdi32/tests/Makefile.in |2 +-
> dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c | 156
> ++
> 2 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>
>
>
>
Hi,
Jeremy Drake wrote:
> This integrates the scenarios that I wasn't testing from Nikolay Sivov's
> patch to the tests of 12/7. Also works around some issues I was running
> into trying to write wide strings as L"foo".
>
> ---
> dlls/oleaut32/tests/olepicture.c | 311
> ++
28 matches
Mail list logo
