On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:04 AM, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Isn't this already covered in the cursoricon tests?
> I don't think so. That test would be marked TODO_WINE in that case, so your
> patch would cause a test failure(unexpected success). If that test wasn't
> marked todo
Dan Kegel wrote:
> This prevents http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16164
>
> ( http://www.microsoft.com/msj/0197/activex/activex0197.aspx looks
> like a nice, scary article on the subject. )
>
-return module_ref ? S_FALSE : S_OK;
+/* Some apps crash if we let mshtml be unloaded.
+
Jeremy White wrote:
> 2. Lots of people hate the secondary scroll bar.
I love the secondary scroll bar. It allows a larger amount of content to
fit into a small space. I did add a "more news" link to the area. That
link will take you to a full width news view. Don't forget, the site
will als
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Lei Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Commit aacb511da1540fa015c5e853c90fd054b9442701 assumed NT+ behaved
> the same way, but running the tests turns out it's actually W2K+.
>
Doh, that came out wrong. Ignore, sorry.
Austin English wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Scott Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> We also don't really need a link to AppDB from the big buttons in the
>> front - AppDB is only the place to go when you're looking for it (hence
>> the button in the upper right) or once you k
Thanks for all the feedback, folks; I have to admit that was a bit
overwhelming. I've read through it all, and have tried to digest it, below.
But I think there is a strong sense here that no one likes a web site
designed by committee. Given that, I think the plan will be to adjust
based on feed
Hello,
Just as Dan Kegel likes to announce on the list, how Wine gets mentioned out on
the internet, I thought this may be interesting/motivating to you.
This page, http://ejohn.org/blog/accuracy-of-javascript-time/, mentions (big)
problems in testing javascript performances (there's some inter
Sent to wrong mailing list.
-Forwarded Message-
>From: James Mckenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Nov 25, 2008 9:01 AM
>To: Wine Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: RFC: Proposed new web site design
>
>Daniel Scharrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at Nov 25, 2008 8:50 AM (MST) wrote
2008/11/25 Huw Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ---
> dlls/oleaut32/typelib.c | 218
> +++
> 1 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Looks good. Thanks for doing this.
--
Rob Shearman
The new user-centric design looks promising. Contrary to some others I
quite like the round corners and more modern look. Here are a few
observations:
- Light gray text on a white background is not so nice.
- I thought it was called "Wine" and not "WINE" now. Shouldn't the
"logo" at the top left
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Scott Ritchie wrote:
[...]
> Can be improved with minor tweaks:
> * The news should be clickable, and take you to a separate news page
> with slightly longer stories.
Agreed. We should have a separate news page. It could probably
work as the news archive page directly: just s
Hi Scott,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 1:39 AM, Scott Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it at all feasible to run Windows mobile apps under Wine? From what
> I understand it's supposed to be largely the same API as standard Win32.
>
> How about a port to ARM for the purpose of running Windows Mo
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At Wineconf, we made the decision to change the entry page to the Wine
> web site. The hope was to simplify and stream line it, and to put in
> place the infrastructure to start moving more content to the Wiki.
>
> Jeremy N
Somebody asked if there was a way to find out which
bugs were not yet linked into the appdb. There
ought to be, but I don't know of one, so I ran
the report the hard way last night. It's at
http://kegel.com/wine/unlinked.html
- Dan
It's looking pretty good, but I think that the one at
http://caih.org/wine/WineHQ.html is a little better. What I really don't
like about them is that everything's a bit too rounded, which looks a
little tacky. The icons, tabs, and white backgrounds could all be
squarer. Also, the icons and lin
> It might be possible, but since we have no arm developers it's not
> going to happen.
That's a kinda self-fullfilling prophecy, isn't it?
There's a lot of talk going on here about "User focus" which is
absolutely great. In the 15 years of Wine development, we've accrued
quite a large user base (myself included; I've never even written a
patch for Wine, and only started using Wine 5-6 years ago). Perhaps
these questions need to be ans
Hi scott,
2008/11/25 Scott Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is it at all feasible to run Windows mobile apps under Wine? From what
> I understand it's supposed to be largely the same API as standard Win32.
>
> How about a port to ARM for the purpose of running Windows Mobile apps,
> or just recompi
> Isn't this already covered in the cursoricon tests?
I don't think so. That test would be marked TODO_WINE in that case, so your
patch would cause a test failure(unexpected success). If that test wasn't
marked todo the behavior your patch adds would be implemented already.
The Wine design would focus more on users. The 'banner' would be about running
your Windows programs on Linux/FreeBSD/Mac and would mention office apps, games
and so on. The highlights would show features e.g. support for Win3.1-XP,
DirectX capability and so on.
Roderick
> Roderick Colenbrande
Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well regression is a regression. Most in Wine are that way - something got
> fixed / implemented that uncovered yet another problem.
Yes, but we don't revert the change in such cases, that would prevent
any progress. Reverting is only appropriate whe
Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
> The look of the website has improved a lot and it feels a lot more
> modern. Personally I don't like the front page much. I find it a bit
> empty. I would like to see what Wine is. I would suggest to look at
> http://www.go-mono.com the website of the Mono project. On
Hi all,
I'm really excited about the new redesign effort.
Overall the first attempt seemed more consistent.
I like the vertical alignment more.
I've got troubles to get oriented in the second attempt.
Black background of search dialog seems more consistent with the page style.
I'm absolutely hap
The look of the website has improved a lot and it feels a lot more modern.
Personally I don't like the front page much. I find it a bit empty. I would
like to see what Wine is. I would suggest to look at http://www.go-mono.com the
website of the Mono project. On their website your directly see o
24 matches
Mail list logo
