Accounts in bugzilla and e-mail addresses used to submit patches

2008-11-22 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
Can please everyone make sure that their e-mail in bugzilla matches the e-mail they use to submit patches? Or at least make it easily guessable. Or can we have all developers create page on Wiki and state their e-mails they use on bugazilla? The reason I'm asking is the standard procedure for a re

re: How do I create a backtrace?

2008-11-22 Thread Dan Kegel
The FAQ covers this: http://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ#head-16da35b6327024d6ea576e3678488b16862d0f5e

Re: How do I create a backtrace?

2008-11-22 Thread Austin English
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Matt Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been asked by a Wine developer to provide a backtrace along with > a "+relay,+seh" log for a bug that I have filed. I've read through the > developer documentation but I can't figure out how to do this. I sent > an email

How do I create a backtrace?

2008-11-22 Thread Matt Perry
I've been asked by a Wine developer to provide a backtrace along with a "+relay,+seh" log for a bug that I have filed. I've read through the developer documentation but I can't figure out how to do this. I sent an email to the developer with a request for instructions but have not received a reply.

Re: Wine release 1.1.9

2008-11-22 Thread Francois Gouget
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008, Alexandre Julliard wrote: [...] > The conformance aspect is of course important too, I think the conformance aspect is the most important aspect of these tests. After all, verifying that Wine's behavior is as wrong in the new version as in the previous is pretty useless. >

Re: Regarding ./configure file

2008-11-22 Thread Detlef Riekenberg
On Fr, 2008-11-21 at 10:57 -0800, Juan Lang wrote: > > I thought that if you want to add anything to wine you: > > > > 1 - simply add it to git > > 2 - ./tools/make_makefiles > > 3 - autoconf > > 4 - ./configure > > 5 - make depend && make > > > > Is this wrong? > > Yes. On occasion we need to a

Re: Wine release 1.1.9

2008-11-22 Thread Eric Pouech
Alexandre Julliard a écrit : > Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Alexandre Julliard wrote: >> >>> The Wine development release 1.1.9 is now available. >>> >>> What's new in this release (see below for details): >>> - A large number of regression test fixes. >>

Re: LPD3DXMESH

2008-11-22 Thread Reece Dunn
2008/11/22 Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > LPD3DXMESH supposed to be declared in? >> > >> >> http://letmegooglethatforyou.com/?q=LPD3DXMESH > That doesn't necessarily work for Wine. Many DirectX searches are spammed > with archived Wine-devel or wine-patches mails. > > The best way to fin

Re: LPD3DXMESH

2008-11-22 Thread Andrew Fenn
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > LPD3DXMESH supposed to be declared in? >> > >> >> http://letmegooglethatforyou.com/?q=LPD3DXMESH > That doesn't necessarily work for Wine. Many DirectX searches are spammed > with archived Wine-devel or wine-patches m

RE: LPD3DXMESH

2008-11-22 Thread Stefan Dösinger
> > LPD3DXMESH supposed to be declared in? > > > > http://letmegooglethatforyou.com/?q=LPD3DXMESH That doesn't necessarily work for Wine. Many DirectX searches are spammed with archived Wine-devel or wine-patches mails. The best way to find out is to download the DirectX SDK, install it(it should

Re: Wine release 1.1.9

2008-11-22 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > >> The Wine development release 1.1.9 is now available. >> >> What's new in this release (see below for details): >> - A large number of regression test fixes. > > > > Actually it's not regression te