Rob Shearman wrote:
> 2008/11/18 ricardo filipe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> diff --git a/dlls/rpcrt4/rpc_transport.c b/dlls/rpcrt4/rpc_transport.c
>> index 3d66740..815ed64 100644
>> --- a/dlls/rpcrt4/rpc_transport.c
>> +++ b/dlls/rpcrt4/rpc_transport.c
>> @@ -479,7 +479,6 @@ static size_t rpcrt4_ncacn
2008/11/18 ricardo filipe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> diff --git a/dlls/rpcrt4/rpc_transport.c b/dlls/rpcrt4/rpc_transport.c
> index 3d66740..815ed64 100644
> --- a/dlls/rpcrt4/rpc_transport.c
> +++ b/dlls/rpcrt4/rpc_transport.c
> @@ -479,7 +479,6 @@ static size_t rpcrt4_ncacn_np_get_top_of_tower(unsign
2008/11/18 ricardo filipe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> @@ -1951,6 +1951,12 @@ HRESULT WINAPI CoRegisterClassObject(
> newClass->pMarshaledData,
> flags &
> (REGCLS_MULTIPLEUSE|REGCLS_MULTI_SEPARATE),
> &ne
I've looked into configure and configure.ac and I've seen that configure
is quite more recent than configure.ac and it seems to have been
changed manually. Am I wrong ?
Max
Stefan Dösinger ha scritto:
> Don't modify ./configure directly, edit configure.ac instead. The
> autoconf documenta
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 01:11:05PM -0800, Jeremy Drake wrote:
> In order to implement OleLoadPictureFile and OleLoadPictureFileEx, it will
> be necessary to change their entries in oleaut32.spec from stub to
> stdcall. The stdcall syntax wants a list of parameter types, which puts
> these function
In order to implement OleLoadPictureFile and OleLoadPictureFileEx, it will
be necessary to change their entries in oleaut32.spec from stub to
stdcall. The stdcall syntax wants a list of parameter types, which puts
these functions in an unususal situation: they take a VARIANT (which is a
struct, in
Don't modify ./configure directly, edit configure.ac instead. The autoconf
documentation describes how this file works. configure is then created from
configure.ac by running "autoconf"
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of shanmukha sainath addepalli
Sent: Tuesday,
ricardo filipe wrote:
> only return value checking in this patch.
>
> _
> Confira vídeos com notícias do NY Times, gols direto do Lance,
> videocassetadas e muito mais no MSN Video!
> http://video.msn.com/?mkt=pt-br
>
>
> -
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Michael Karcher wrote:
> Looks OK to me, but what happened to your finding about
> INET_E_RESOURCE_NOT_FOUND? Was it a red herring?
I saw that on XP, but I couldn't reproduce it on Windows 2000. I need to
investigate this further. Is there a mechansim to do
windows-version-
Sir/Madam,
I need to add few functions related to libwnck. It requires some header
files to be included. I included them in wine source code. But when compiled
it says header files not found. I haven't updated configure file. How can i
update it?
please tell me what r the changes that i need to ma
it seems you two fixed the same, juan sent a patch in a previous wine-devel
email.
you might want to check that because you two have different solutions for the
first problem, line 415.
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:41:50 +0100
> Subject: netapi32: Actually return a coup
On Tuesday 18 November 2008 22:48:11 Paul Vriens wrote:
> https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=61801&forum=11
>
> I've installed these rpm's but the executables use a different naming
> convention: i686-pc-mingw32* instead of what we check for: i686-mingw32*.
>
> Should
On Wednesday 19 November 2008 00:10:52 Juan Lang wrote:
> > Does that netbios code actually work? IIRC you need to bind to port 137
> > to do netbios requests.
>
> That's not strictly true, you can be a client without binding to port
> 137. You just can't advertise any services. I haven't tried i
13 matches
Mail list logo
