Re: winex11.drv: fix a compiler warning (4/10)

On Tuesday 11 November 2008 07:28:11 pm Austin English wrote: > -   TRACE(output); > +   TRACE(output, "%s"); I think you put this on backwards. Some of the other patches seem to be the same way. This gets rid of the warning because you add an extra parameter, which the c

Re: Compiler warnings in gcc 4.3.2

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:28 PM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I recently upgraded to intrepid, which has gcc 4.3.2. It gave a few >> new warnings, and I've got patches ready for all but this one. I >> starte

Re: Compiler warnings in gcc 4.3.2

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I recently upgraded to intrepid, which has gcc 4.3.2. It gave a few > new warnings, and I've got patches ready for all but this one. I > started to write a patch to remove the check, since it's useless, but > wasn't sure i

Compiler warnings in gcc 4.3.2

I recently upgraded to intrepid, which has gcc 4.3.2. It gave a few new warnings, and I've got patches ready for all but this one. I started to write a patch to remove the check, since it's useless, but wasn't sure if it should instead be converted to a signed integer instead. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/

Re: Implements GradientFill /GdiGradientFill

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 2:22 PM, joirge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need it to run a program to change frequencuies to a radiomodem > satelline . > Many Thanks > > > You forgot the patch. -- -Austin

Re: shdocvw: Correct test for non-existing interfaces

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Alistair Leslie-Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, >This add a test for the IViewObjectEx interface as well as correcting the > exiting tests. > > Changelog: >shdocvw: Correct test for non-existing interfaces > -ok(propbrowse == NULL, "propbrow

Re: shdocvw: Added Support for the IViewObjectEx interface

Jacek Caban wrote: > Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Changelog: >> shdocvw: Added Support for the IViewObjectEx interface > > Please check if interface you add is really supposed to be there. It's > not the first time someone tries to add an interface to WebBrowser or > HTMLDocum

Re: shdocvw: Added Support for the IViewObjectEx interface

Jacek Caban wrote: > Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Changelog: >> shdocvw: Added Support for the IViewObjectEx interface > > Please check if interface you add is really supposed to be there. It's > not the first time someone tries to add an interface to WebBrowser or > HTMLDocume

Re: shdocvw: Added Support for the IViewObjectEx interface

Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote: > Hi, > > Changelog: > shdocvw: Added Support for the IViewObjectEx interface Please check if interface you add is really supposed to be there. It's not the first time someone tries to add an interface to WebBrowser or HTMLDocument that shouldn't be there (this

Wine and relocation on not aligned section

Hi list, while diving into wine sources i've noticed that wine does not apply relocation to section not aligned to page boundary. Is there any reason for this behaviour? If it is wrong i've put up a little patch that solves the issue. Greetings, Alessandro Pignotti -- Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus

Re: d3dx9_38.dll: Add the dll.

Hi, > +#include "config.h" > +#include "wine/port.h" > + > +#include > + > +#include "windef.h" > +#include "winbase.h" > +#include "wingdi.h" > +#include "winuser.h" > +#include "wine/debug.h" > + > +#include "d3dx9.h" There's no point in including so many unneccessary header files.

Re: winspool.drv/tests: Fix a test on all platforms.

2008/11/6 Nicolas Le Cam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > DeviceCapabilities DC_FIELDS always sets the DM_FORMNAME flag. > Mark this test as a todo_wine. > > Nicolas Le Cam Is there something wrong with this one ? Should I fix wine too ? I didn't because I don't know where to fix it (in winspool.drv