On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Hans Leidekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> sec cpuwine notes
> >> 676 e7200 June http://kegel.com/new-computer-2008.html ubuntu 8.04
> >> 615 e7300 Nov
> >> 585 e7400 Nov (estimated
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:27 AM, frechdachs69
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am currently wondering which test cases make sense after an integration of
> winscard patches. So far most API calls are directly related to pcsc-lite
> behaviour and therefore we need a result from pcsc-lite which is comp
Hi together!
I am currently wondering which test cases make sense after an integration of
winscard patches. So far most API calls are directly related to pcsc-lite
behaviour and therefore we need a result from pcsc-lite which is comparable
with what Win/winscard.dll would return to us. But this
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:35 AM, Hans Leidekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> sec cpuwine notes
>> 676 e7200 June http://kegel.com/new-computer-2008.html ubuntu 8.04
>> 615 e7300 Nov
>> 585 e7400 Nov (estimated, supposedly 5% faster than e7300)
>> 540 e8400 Nov
>> 360 q9400 Nov
>>
>> In all c
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 02:20:04PM +0100, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> On Friday 07 November 2008 13:48:29 Huw Davies wrote:
> > > This interface is undocumented but fortunately its name was enough
> > > of a hint to create a sensible implementation. Used by Outlook when
> > > retrieving or sending a ma
On Friday 07 November 2008 13:48:29 Huw Davies wrote:
> > This interface is undocumented but fortunately its name was enough
> > of a hint to create a sensible implementation. Used by Outlook when
> > retrieving or sending a mail.
>
> We already have MimeOleCreateVirtualStream() which is implement
Hans Leidekker wrote:
> This interface is undocumented but fortunately its name was enough
> of a hint to create a sensible implementation. Used by Outlook when
> retrieving or sending a mail.
We already have MimeOleCreateVirtualStream() which is implemented on top
of CreateStreamOnHGlobal()...
Hi,
Note that Vmware its 3D support makes use of the opengl drivers of the host
system. In other words the crash could indeed be a bug inside the vmware 3d
drivers but it could even be related to the opengl drivers on your Linux system.
Roderick
> Hi,
>
> FYI.
>
> I had to disable "Accelerat
Hi,
At the moment, if you have several themes installed on your system
(e.g. by installing StyleXP) winecfg will list those themes in a
random (read not sorted) order.
If I just add the CBS_SORT flag, the wrong theme is chosen because the
order in the combo boxes are assumed to be the same order
Hi,
FYI.
I had to disable "Accelerate 3D graphics (DirectX 9.0c)" in the VM settings on
several of my Vmware boxes. Winetest crashed my W2K and Vista box (ddraw:d3d)
and made my Win98 box unresponsive (user32:sysparams when changing to 8bit
display).
If I can find some spare time I will repor
"Andrew Fenn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do I need to include all the code as well or is this just going to be
> a C file with just DllMain in each of the dlls folders?
Just DllMain since the other functions are forwarded.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do I need to include all the code as well or is this just going to be
a C file with just DllMain in each of the dlls folders?
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Andrew Fenn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> +BOOL WINAPI DllMain(HINSTANCE inst, DWORD r
Tony Wasserka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +/* About This->flags:
> + != D3DXSPRITE_FLAGLIMIT+1 means we have already called
> ID3DXSprite_Begin
> + == D3DXSPRITE_FLAGLIMIT+1 means we have either called
> D3DXCreateSprite or ID3DXSprite_End
> + In the first case we
"Andrew Fenn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +BOOL WINAPI DllMain(HINSTANCE inst, DWORD reason, LPVOID reserved)
> +{
> +switch(reason)
> +{
> +case DLL_WINE_PREATTACH:
> +return FALSE; /* prefer native version */
You need to do that for all the dlls, not just the 1_3 one. Also
On Friday 07 November 2008 10:01:53 Dan Kegel wrote:
> FWIW: with wine from git from a couple days ago,
> here are wine build times on various Intel CPUs
> in seconds on Ubuntu 8.10's gcc-4.3.2 (or 8.04):
>
> sec cpuwine notes
> 676 e7200 June http://kegel.com/new-computer-2008.html ubuntu
FWIW: with wine from git from a couple days ago,
here are wine build times on various Intel CPUs
in seconds on Ubuntu 8.10's gcc-4.3.2 (or 8.04):
sec cpuwine notes
676 e7200 June http://kegel.com/new-computer-2008.html ubuntu 8.04
615 e7300 Nov
585 e7400 Nov (estimated, supposedly 5% faster
16 matches
Mail list logo
