Hi Robert,
2008/11/5, Robert Reif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Changelog:
>> winmm: Increase tolerance range in tests
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Alistair Leslie-Hughes
>>
> Please give an explanation why? If it's just to make the test pass,
> then we need to k
Have you tried linking to kernel32 too?
2008/11/6, Michael Ost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
>
> When I upgraded wine-develfrom 1.0 to 1.1.7, my winelib app that uses
> __TRY no longer links. It complains that RtlUnwind cannot be found. I
> can see that RtlUnwind was added to wine/exceptio
Hi all,
When I upgraded wine-develfrom 1.0 to 1.1.7, my winelib app that uses
__TRY no longer links. It complains that RtlUnwind cannot be found. I
can see that RtlUnwind was added to wine/exception.h, but I am not sure
how to fix it.
I tried adding -lntdll and -lwine to the link command line
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 04:37:37PM -0500, Steven Edwards wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:54 PM, C.J. Adams-Collier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > What steps need to be taken to implement the WFP API using libwine?
To answer my own question, it looks like the event handling
funct
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:54 PM, C.J. Adams-Collier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> What steps need to be taken to implement the WFP API using libwine?
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb427363(VS.85).aspx
>
> The first platform I'd like to see implementation on is Linux/iptable
Hey all,
What steps need to be taken to implement the WFP API using libwine?
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb427363(VS.85).aspx
The first platform I'd like to see implementation on is Linux/iptables.
*BSD/pf is next on the list followed by Solaris/ipf
Cheers,
C.J.
signature.asc
De
On Di, 2008-11-04 at 10:25 -0800, chris ahrendt wrote:
> >
> Actually as of 6.5 of VMWARE direct draw 9c is 100% supported. So why
> couldn't we use vmware 6.5
> as a valid platform for testing direct draw api's?
When our tests use valid data but received an E_NOTIMPL,
then DirectX 9c in VMWar
Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It may be a bit paranoid, and maybe it's not worth it (though I don't
> think it costs us much). In any case, whatever Alexandre decides I'll
> follow.
I don't think it's worth it. There's no real logic to how the various
types are used in the API a
For Wine's purposes the WinXP file format is fine for now. It will allow better
integration into the linux desktop. Support for all those fancy animation
features and others which are offered in Vista would also require major changes
in Wine's rendering system. Sure some might not be hard to sup
2008/11/4 Roderick Colenbrander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> The way to go for Wine theming is to use Windows XP themes. Unfortunately the
> file format itself is not documented. Based on Wine its uxtheme code (BTW our
> uxtheme is quite complete) and an analysis of some 'free' XP themes like
The new patchwatcher is sort of up; I'm focusing
on things like getting the load balancing
and blacklist right before I even think about
email output. You can look at the results at
http://kegel.com/wine/patchwatcher/results2/
but they will probably not be very reliable for
a few more days.
(And
Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Changelog:
> winmm: Increase tolerance range in tests
>
> Best Regards
> Alistair Leslie-Hughes
>
Please give an explanation why? If it's just to make the test pass,
then we need to know why the test is failing.
Is it only needed for wine? Could be
Henri Verbeet wrote:
> 2008/11/4 Michael Stefaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> ---
>> server/console.c |2 +-
>> server/trace.c | 130
>> +++---
>> 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
>>
> server/trace.c is mostly auto generated, y
2008/11/4 Michael Stefaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ---
> server/console.c |2 +-
> server/trace.c | 130
> +++---
> 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
>
server/trace.c is mostly auto generated, you'd have to modify
tools/make_
14 matches
Mail list logo
