I see in wine-1.1.5's announcement that we now have
partial support for "Layered Windows",
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms997507.aspx
Which apps use this?
Seems that it used to make screen captures hard,
so one way to find them is to look for apps that
say you have to turn on "Capture A
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 1:21 AM, Dylan Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Implemented the code to check for this condition in the function that
> handles WM_SETCURSOR. For each scrollbar I checked for visibility and
> checked the MessagePos to see if the mouse was over the scrollbar.
> ---
> dlls/
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 12:01 -0500, Austin English wrote:
> +if (apc_user)
> + if (warn) {
> + FIXME("I/O completion on lock not implemented yet\n");
> + warn = FALSE;
> + }
It's a style thing, but I for one would much prefer
brackets around the outer if to pre
Hi Austin,
> Not sure if this is the best way to go about this or not. Any advice
> appreciated (or if anyone else wants to silence it :-P).
You're close. The only fix is:
+BOOLEAN warn = TRUE;
should be static. (Otherwise it'll be TRUE every time the function is
called, so it'll always
Austin English wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I was taking a look at some of the noisy fixme's, and wanted some
> feedback on the attached patch.
> This particular fixme is _really_ noisy...out of this
> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=16447)
> log, it has 9635 of the 13117 lines!
>
> "fixme:ntdll:N
2008/10/3 Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Howdy,
>
> I was taking a look at some of the noisy fixme's, and wanted some
> feedback on the attached patch.
That patch won't make the FIXME any less noisy, for one.
> This particular fixme is _really_ noisy...out of this
> (http://bugs.winehq.org/
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I was taking a look at some of the noisy fixme's, and wanted some
> feedback on the attached patch.
> This particular fixme is _really_ noisy...out of this
> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=16447)
> lo
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 11:46 -0500, Austin English wrote:
> +BOOLEAN warn = TRUE;
This has to be static, else it will always be TRUE.
--
Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lattica, Inc.
Howdy,
I was taking a look at some of the noisy fixme's, and wanted some
feedback on the attached patch.
This particular fixme is _really_ noisy...out of this
(http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=16447)
log, it has 9635 of the 13117 lines!
"fixme:ntdll:NtLockFile I/O completion on lock not i
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Verbeet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 10:25 AM
> To: Stefan Dösinger
> Subject: Re: d3d8/9: Use WINED3D_OK instead of D3D_OK in vertexshader.c.
>
> 2008/10/3 Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Actually, since the retur
Actually, since the return value comes from WineD3D, we should use WINED3D_OK
here. Although there is not really a scheme behind all this and we never cared
about that because both WINED3D_OK and D3D_OK are #define'd to S_OK.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wine-p
I have a mostly finished assembler, and a HLSL compiler in the works. I have a
git tree out there which has the patches, but the server is currently shut
down. I'm currently away from home, but I'll return tomorrow. If I forget to
reply, can you remind me in a few days?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi Alistair, maybe I'm being overly picky, but::
--- /dev/null
+++ b/dlls/msxml3/httprequest.c
@@ -0,0 +1,343 @@
+/*
This file has DOS line endings. The rest of the files do not. It's
really distracting in the patch, since this portion of the patch has
^M at the end of every line.
--Juan
Hans Leidekker wrote:
> Would it be possible to use winhttp instead of nanohttp? The less
> we depend on libxml the better I'd say.
>
We probably should use urlmon, not winhttp.
Jacek
From: "Hans Leidekker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 9:45 PM
To: ; "Alistair Leslie-Hughes"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: msxml3: Add IXMLHTTPRequest support
> On Friday 03 October 2008 13:23:14 Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
>
>> Changelog:
>> msxml3: Add IXMLHTTPRequest s
On Friday 03 October 2008 13:23:14 Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
> Changelog:
> msxml3: Add IXMLHTTPRequest support
Would it be possible to use winhttp instead of nanohttp? The less
we depend on libxml the better I'd say.
-Hans
> I googled a bit more. There are at least two ways of achieving this
> mentioned in the docs of libFoundation: by using XML-RPC call and by
> wrapping classes in ANSI-C APIs. [4]
Well actually you can easily access all Obj-C features trough the
following pure C API:
http://developer.apple.
Am 02.10.2008 um 20:16 schrieb Saulius Krasuckas:
> * On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Adam Strzelecki wrote:
>>> Is it really technically impossible to access the Quartz APIs or
>>> write Mac applications using C?
>>
>> Well it is possible, for example iTunes is non Objective-C Carbon
>> (API) app AFAIK.
2008/10/2 Juan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Rob,
>
> + * Locks the index for system-wide exclusive access.
> + *
> + * RETURNS
> + * TRUE if successful
> + * FALSE if failed and calls SetLastError.
> */
> static LPURLCACHE_HEADER
> URLCacheContainer_LockIndex(URLCACHECONTAINER * pContainer)
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
