On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Juan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not acceptable practice. See e.g. the old faq entry:
> http://www.winehq.org/site/docs/wine-faq/index#HOW-CAN-I-DETECT-WINE
I don't understand why this should still be the case. We have a stable
Wine now and Alexadre exported
Thanks.
I'll get onto it right away.
Wesley Parish
Quoting Owen Rudge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Does anyone know where to get copies of the Win32s documentation, such
> as
> > it
> > is?
>
> I don't know where to find a copy as such (perhaps tucked away in the
> old
> Microsoft FTP server, or
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 15:15, Guillaume VanderEst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Based on the current information, wouldn't it be smartest to ask the users
> which drive(s) they would like included in the search, or is it actually
> required that all disks be scanned?
The average non-Wine user of t
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 14:55, Juan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Did you read the second paragraph of my original email? I'm not
>> working around a bug in Wine, unless it's a bug that a user can map
>> "/" to "C:" and call it a "fixed disk".
>
> Yes, I read it. And scanning "/" shouldn't b
> Yes, that's the root of the problem. I can't prevent the end-user
> from mounting network drives -- in fact, in the expected installation
> environment, the average user will have several very large network
> drives mounted.
I believe you.
> Under Windows, installation takes about five minutes
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Mark Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 14:41, Juan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> What's the best way for an application to detect that it's running under
>>> Wine?
>>
>> Some people have given suggestions, but please note that we dis
> I'de like to nominate this bit of code (if approved as an 'acceptable
> practice') for the wiki. It seems Wine-devel gets this question at
> least once a month. Thoughts?
Not acceptable practice. See e.g. the old faq entry:
http://www.winehq.org/site/docs/wine-faq/index#HOW-CAN-I-DETECT-WINE
> Did you read the second paragraph of my original email? I'm not
> working around a bug in Wine, unless it's a bug that a user can map
> "/" to "C:" and call it a "fixed disk".
Yes, I read it. And scanning "/" shouldn't be a problem, unless
you've also mapped network drives there. That seems t
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 14:41, Juan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What's the best way for an application to detect that it's running under
>> Wine?
>
> Some people have given suggestions, but please note that we discourage
> doing this. It's better to fix Wine than to work around its bugs, a
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Juan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What's the best way for an application to detect that it's running under
>> Wine?
>
> Some people have given suggestions, but please note that we discourage
> doing this. It's better to fix Wine than to work around its bugs,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Jeff Zaroyko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Easier still would be checking for wine_get_version in ntdll...
>
>
> #include
> #include
> int main(void)
> {
> static const char * (CDECL *pwine_get_version)(void);
> HMODULE hntdll = GetModuleHandle("ntdll.dll");
>
> What's the best way for an application to detect that it's running under Wine?
Some people have given suggestions, but please note that we discourage
doing this. It's better to fix Wine than to work around its bugs, and
working around bugs removes incentive to fix them. So please, log a
bug ab
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Mark Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What's the best way for an application to detect that it's running under
>> Wine?
>>
>> As part of the installation process, under Windows our pro
Rob Shearman gmail.com> writes:
Hi Rob, i think i got the test ready now, i'll send it when the defenitions are
in place in ctxtcall.idl. Now still strugling how to fix the bug.
I fixed up the patch below, also by looking how things are done in similar
places in wine-code. With patch appli
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Mark Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the best way for an application to detect that it's running under Wine?
>
> As part of the installation process, under Windows our program does a
> full-disk search of all local hard drives, but ignoring network drives
What's the best way for an application to detect that it's running under Wine?
As part of the installation process, under Windows our program does a
full-disk search of all local hard drives, but ignoring network drives
and removable media. Under Wine, this doesn't work too well, as
there's not a
Hi Dylan,
@@ -402,6 +401,10 @@ static void test_EM_SCROLLCARET(void)
"ff\n"
"gg\n"
"hh\n";
+ HWND hwndRichEdit = CreateWindow(RICHEDIT_CLASS, NULL,
+
ES_MULTILINE|WS_POPUP|WS_HSCROLL|WS_VSCROLL|WS_VISIBLE,
+ 0, 0, 200, 80, NULL, NULL,
hmodule
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.soft32.com/download/63-129953-1/Adobe_Contribute_4_Win.exe
> fails with
> err:module:import_dll Library MSVCP71.dll (which is needed by
> L"C:\\Program Files\\Adobe\\Contribute 4\\CoreTypes.dll") not found
>
> Wine ha
Ignore this; patchwatcher probably got confused by the word
difference at the beginning of a line. This is a known and
very lame bug...
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Patchwatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi! This is the experimental automated wine patchwatcher thingy.
> The latest git so
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Vitaliy Margolen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeremy White wrote:
>> We discussed bugzilla versions at Wineconf, re:
>>
>> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12728
>>
>> There were several points of consensus. First, it would be helpful
>> if we could reduce th
> Does anyone know where to get copies of the Win32s documentation, such as
> it
> is?
I don't know where to find a copy as such (perhaps tucked away in the old
Microsoft FTP server, or linked to from a KB article?), but I do have a
couple of versions here, shipped with various old compilers. P
I completely forgot to write to the broader list to let you know
that we successfully added 1 more machine - Stefans - to the list of computers
that run make test successfully. (We also got James Hawkins Windows box
down to 1 failure, and eliminated an enormous number of other test failures).
I f
Hi.
I'm wondering about doing a quick-n-dirty Win32s re-implementation for
ReactOS, following an email [last-year-this-year] discussion on the ReactOS
dev list. Based on Wine, of course, and operating as Windows-on-Windows in
the Microsoft OS of the same name.
Does anyone know where to get co
2008/9/29 Scott Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Arthur Taylor wrote:
>> Also, in the patch, configure checks for pulseaudio >= 0.9.7. I have
>> since noticed that it uses parts of the api from 0.9.11 and compilation
>> will fail against previous versions.
>>
>> Thanks
>
> As an aside, 0.9.11 is newe
Arthur Taylor wrote:
> Also, in the patch, configure checks for pulseaudio >= 0.9.7. I have
> since noticed that it uses parts of the api from 0.9.11 and compilation
> will fail against previous versions.
>
> Thanks
As an aside, 0.9.11 is newer than most users have (Ubuntu 8.04 has
0.9.10, for in
Owen Rudge wrote:
> > I was stopped at security for carrying 'a wine bottle' through
> > security. Upon a brief inspection it was revealed that my
> > super-awesome crossover t-shirts had tripped the machine due to their
> > lusciously exquisite compressed shape. Whoops.
>
> I'll be sure to pu
26 matches
Mail list logo
