On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Vitaliy Margolen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff Zaroyko wrote:
>>
>>
>> +static const WCHAR testdirW[] =
>> {'n','t','d','e','l','e','t','e','f','i','l','e',0};
>> +static const WCHAR subdirW[] = {'\\','s','u','b',0};
>> +
>> +ret = CreateDirectoryW
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 11:01 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been experimenting on my XP and Vista boxes and the only way to make the
> tests run fast is by stopping 'System Restore'.
>
> It makes sense that this has a huge impact on performance, especially with
> the
> big number of i
Am Samstag, den 30.08.2008, 11:41 -0600 schrieb Vitaliy Margolen:
> Almost no programs are calling the Nt* functions directly. But kernel32
> functions. So the point about knowing the file handle in return from
> NtCreateFile is moot. And kernel32's CreateFile() already prints that
> information fo
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Hawkins wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> James Hawkins wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Adam Petaccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The slowness on some machines for the install tests comes from the system
> restore facility. When 'System Restore' is active you will find a great
> number
> of system restore points after these tests have run. Addin
James Hawkins wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> James Hawkins wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Adam Petaccia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 10:26 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking in
Hi,
Sorry to disappoint you but I have a feeling that this is most likely a bug in
Xfce instead of Wine. Our window management code might use some legacy
mechanisms here and there but it works on all window managers (except for this
Xfce issue). A few years ago we had similar issues with Metaci
Rico Schüller schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> this patch adds the initial scissorrect for d3d9. The improvement from
> the last patch is, that it doesn't try to set it for d3d8 and ddraw
> because both don't support scissorrects.
>
> Cheers
> Rico
>
Hi,
I'm using Wine with xUbuntu and you may be know, the menu and toolbar of
xfce are often visible. So I've looked at xfce forum and saw that wine
doesn't inform xfce that window is fullscreen...
At http://standards.freedesktop.org/wm-spec/wm-spec-latest.html, I've
found a _NET_WM_STATE_FUL
Jeff Zaroyko wrote:
>
>
> +static const WCHAR testdirW[] =
> {'n','t','d','e','l','e','t','e','f','i','l','e',0};
> +static const WCHAR subdirW[] = {'\\','s','u','b',0};
> +
> +ret = CreateDirectoryW(testdirW, NULL);
You need to create test files and directories in windows temp dir.
Michael Karcher wrote:
> [The original mail seemed to be stuck in the moderation queue or
> got lost somewhere else. Reposting with correct "From:" this
> time]
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 27.08.2008, 17:14 +0900 schrieb Dmitry Timoshkov:
>> "Markus Hitter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Providing the
I'm really stumped on why this even works because after writing a test
(attached) and running on windows it shows that ppZStencilSurface IS
getting set to null when D3DERR_NOTFOUND is returned.
Could it be that there is something else behind this problem which is
unrelated to what I have been look
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 2:13 AM, Rico Schüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My patch let the ddraw:d3d.c crash on wine (search for "0x60e52ad9
> IWineD3DBaseSwapChainImpl_GetBackBuffer" in the log
> (http://kegel.com/wine/patchwatcher/results/274.log)). So it isn't in the
> blacklist and shouldn't
Henri Verbeet schrieb:
> 2008/8/30 Rico Schüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> this patch adds the initial scissorrect for d3d9. The improvement from the
>> last patch is, that it doesn't try to set it for d3d8 and ddraw because both
>> don't support scissorrects.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Rico
>>
>
2008/8/30 Rico Schüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> this patch adds the initial scissorrect for d3d9. The improvement from the
> last patch is, that it doesn't try to set it for d3d8 and ddraw because both
> don't support scissorrects.
>
> Cheers
> Rico
>
I'd rather keep that in wined3d for now.
Dan Kegel schrieb:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Rico Schüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> some days ago I've send a patch which broke some other tests, see
>> http://www.kegel.com/wine/patchwatcher/results/274.txt . But this test got
>> a "conformance test ok".
>> I think patchwatcher
Hi Mounir,
this morning I have found spare time to do a quick check of the
winscard.dll.so you provided.
So on my 64Bit AMD64 system your .so works fine so far. Maybe we can address
the structure alignment problem during the next weeks/months? Let us see ...
One thing: while /usr/sbin/testpcs
[The original mail seemed to be stuck in the moderation queue or
got lost somewhere else. Reposting with correct "From:" this
time]
Am Mittwoch, den 27.08.2008, 17:14 +0900 schrieb Dmitry Timoshkov:
> "Markus Hitter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Providing the file handle allows to map
> > rea
18 matches
Mail list logo
