Re: Update generated packing tests using current headers.

2008-06-16 Thread Rob Shearman
2008/6/17 Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Rob Shearman wrote: >> >> --- >> dlls/rpcrt4/tests/generated.c | 47 >> ++- >> dlls/wininet/tests/generated.c |4 +- >> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >> > Aren't these files generated (as a

Re: Update generated packing tests using current headers.

2008-06-16 Thread Paul Vriens
Rob Shearman wrote: > --- > dlls/rpcrt4/tests/generated.c | 47 ++- > dlls/wininet/tests/generated.c |4 +- > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > > > > Aren't

When submitting valgrind patches...

2008-06-16 Thread Dan Kegel
... please include the magic phrase Fixes valgrind warnings like: in the body, followed by an example of the valgrind warnings in question, with addresses and boring parts removed. For example, see http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-June/055658.html That will make it a lot easier

Re: Wine compiler options benchmarks

2008-06-16 Thread Ben Hodgetts
Tomas Carnecky wrote: > Ben Hodgetts (Enverex) wrote: >> Just in-case anyone was ever curious about how well Wine performs >> with different C/XXFLAGs I did a test today with RC5 to see how much >> of a difference it makes with 3DMark 2001 SE, nothing major but if >> someone can think of a bette

Re: Wine compiler options benchmarks

2008-06-16 Thread Tomas Carnecky
Ben Hodgetts (Enverex) wrote: > Just in-case anyone was ever curious about how well Wine performs with > different C/XXFLAGs I did a test today with RC5 to see how much of a > difference it makes with 3DMark 2001 SE, nothing major but if someone > can think of a better benchmark to try, please l

Wine compiler options benchmarks

2008-06-16 Thread Ben Hodgetts (Enverex)
Just in-case anyone was ever curious about how well Wine performs with different C/XXFLAGs I did a test today with RC5 to see how much of a difference it makes with 3DMark 2001 SE, nothing major but if someone can think of a better benchmark to try, please let me know (I had hoped to try Oblivi

Re: How long does it take you to compile wine?

2008-06-16 Thread Ben Hodgetts
Dan Kegel kegel.com> writes: > > Way back five years ago, we all compared notes on how > long it took to build Wine on our systems. > http://www.winehq.org/site/?issue=149#Compile%20Time%20Comparisons%20/%20Tips > > Today I measured it on a new computer (with a spiffy > new Intel dual core e720

Re: Wine compiler options benchmarks

2008-06-16 Thread Anssi Hannula
Ben Hodgetts (Enverex) wrote: > Just in-case anyone was ever curious about how well Wine performs with > different C/XXFLAGs I did a test today with RC5 to see how much of a > difference it makes with 3DMark 2001 SE, nothing major but if someone > can think of a better benchmark to try, please let

Re: Wine compiler options benchmarks

2008-06-16 Thread Edwin Smulders
As you mentioned using oblivion, i suppose you want to try it with a game? Trackmania Nations Forever is free and has a bench feature (all it does is record average fps). On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Ben Hodgetts (Enverex) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just in-case anyone was ever curious about

Re: rpcrt4/tests: Eliminate the test_simple_struct_marshal valgrind error.

2008-06-16 Thread Dan Hipschman
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 08:20:24PM +0100, Rob Shearman wrote: > http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-June/055831.html Ha, oops, sorry.

Re: rpcrt4/tests: Eliminate the test_simple_struct_marshal valgrind error.

2008-06-16 Thread Rob Shearman
2008/6/16 Dan Hipschman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Eliminates eight of these (and similar) from the ndr_marshall test: > > Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) >at 0x4AEF05E: test_simple_struct_marshal (ndr_marshall.c:668) >by 0x4AEFD91: test_simple_struct (ndr_marshall

Wine compiler options benchmarks

2008-06-16 Thread Ben Hodgetts (Enverex)
Just in-case anyone was ever curious about how well Wine performs with different C/XXFLAGs I did a test today with RC5 to see how much of a difference it makes with 3DMark 2001 SE, nothing major but if someone can think of a better benchmark to try, please let me know (I had hoped to try Oblivion o

Re: The upcoming 1.0 and announcing Bordeaux for Linux

2008-06-16 Thread Steven Edwards
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was looking at some of the source code, and some of your files don't > have any copyright. Are the (L)GPL licensed? Yes if its something I've written then its LGPL, unless its something borrowed from another author, in

Re: [legal] eligibility for contributing code to wine for students / graduates of a course derived from the Microsoft Windows Acadamic Program

2008-06-16 Thread Kornél Pál
Hi, > IANAL, but the sources are for the kernel only. This does not include > the UI and other DLLs built on top of the kernel. If we know what DLLs > the sources correspond to, shouldn't the students be restricted to not > contributing to those DLLs only (just like if you use Visual Studio > you

d3dx9_28: add version resource

2008-06-16 Thread David Adam
Hello, maybe you should do this for every d3dx9_xx dll, not only the d3dx9_28 one. David

Re: The upcoming 1.0 and announcing Bordeaux for Linux

2008-06-16 Thread Austin English
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Steven Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And lastly I'd like to announce I am starting a new Free Software > company with a long term goal of providing Products and Services > around Wine and ReactOS. The Bordeaux Group has today released > Bordeaux for Linux whi

Valgrind error status on the eve of Wine 1.0

2008-06-16 Thread Dan Kegel
I've added suppressions for gecko and a few other things, added six more patches of my own and eight patches from Hans, Jon Griffiths, Roy Shea, and Zac Brown. As a result, the error count today (not counting memory leaks) is down 33% from last week; we're down to 218 unique-ish valgrind warnings w

The upcoming 1.0 and announcing Bordeaux for Linux

2008-06-16 Thread Steven Edwards
Hello All, I mentioned the other day in the noise about the upcoming 1.0 and the short comings I felt it had. Others have commented quite a bit on the subject already and so I'll be pretty brief. I think the 1.0 process while its been slow has been a good even with its shortcomings. Like with every

re: Appdb has no rc5 choice

2008-06-16 Thread Dan Kegel
I added the version to bugzilla just now, so the appdb should have it too.

Re: iTunes ipod support

2008-06-16 Thread Austin English
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Ben Engbers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > A few days ago, I bought an iPod classic. > When I connect it to my laptop (running FC7) the iPod shows up on the > desktop. > I downloaded iTunessetup.exe from the Apple site and it installed under > Wine without pro

Re: [legal] eligibility for contributing code to wine for students / graduates of a course derived from the Microsoft Windows Acadamic Program

2008-06-16 Thread Reece Dunn
2008/6/14 Steven Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Mark Farnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If a student is currently taking, or has previously taken a course >> derived from the Microsoft Windows Academic Program >> ... >> will they become *ineligible* to contribute

Re: ddraw: Fix Setmaterial with a test

2008-06-16 Thread David Adam
Yes, it is exactly that. So, I wonder why the patches were not committed. David 2008/6/11 Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > So why are you adding the check that is not present on windows? What > > are th > > reasoning to have this if it clearly absent in native implementation? > As I unde

Re: gdi32: stop font tests crashing under win98

2008-06-16 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Alistair Leslie-Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Changelog: > gdi32: stop font tests crashing under win98 > -if (!*font_name && font_charset == DEFAULT_CHARSET) /* do it only once */ > +/* EnumFontFamilies with the NULL parameter crashs win98 */ > +if (pGetFontUnicodeRanges && !*

Re: winedbg: Add support for printing c++ bool values

2008-06-16 Thread Jon Griffiths
> what about the simpler: > +dbg_printf(val_int ? "true" : "false"); Works for me. I've re-sent the patch. Cheers Jon

iTunes ipod support

2008-06-16 Thread Ben Engbers
Hi, A few days ago, I bought an iPod classic. When I connect it to my laptop (running FC7) the iPod shows up on the desktop. I downloaded iTunessetup.exe from the Apple site and it installed under Wine without problems. iTunes looks good, scanned my system and found all the MP3's, but it doesn't d

Re: Appdb has no rc5 choice

2008-06-16 Thread Austin English
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Vit Hrachovy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > this is never ending story. > > Can we automate adding the new release AppDB entry along with new > release announcement? > > Cheers > Vit > > Leslie Viljoen wrote: >> Hi people >> >> I am testing some games with Rc5 a

Re: Appdb has no rc5 choice

2008-06-16 Thread Vit Hrachovy
Hi, this is never ending story. Can we automate adding the new release AppDB entry along with new release announcement? Cheers Vit Leslie Viljoen wrote: > Hi people > > I am testing some games with Rc5 and wish to submit results in the > AppDb but there is no Rc5 choice. > > Les > >

Appdb has no rc5 choice

2008-06-16 Thread Leslie Viljoen
Hi people I am testing some games with Rc5 and wish to submit results in the AppDb but there is no Rc5 choice. Les

Re: 'Interactive' tests on Windows 2003

2008-06-16 Thread Francois Gouget
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, James Hawkins wrote: [...] > Thanks Francois (I asked on IRC a while back). I get these dialogs in > 2k3 as well. Do you think we should add a check for > winetest_interactive before the calls that bring up the permission > dialog? If anyone else knows of a better way, let u