> I wanted to reply to that post, but /. locked me out.
> If anyone else wants to do it, here's what I was going to say:
They shifted to new servers tonight, probably had something to do with it.
I plagiarized your post completely.
Cheers,
Jeremy
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Figured out why so many people are running winetest on windows today:
> http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=563226&cid=23530662
I wanted to reply to that post, but /. locked me out.
If anyone else wants to do it, here's
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> kernel32:path is mostly
>> "path.c:899:TMP=c:\windows\temp"..."path.c:1178: Test failed: expected
>> buf[0] upper case letter got c", probably people whose ~/.wine is old
>> and has a windir that starts with a lowercase dri
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, lots of people submitted test results for 1.0rc2 already!
> I ran my skipgood filter on it, put the digested data up at
> http://kegel.com/wine/failing-1.0-rc2.html
> and added a little analysis to
> http://wiki.winehq.org
> kernel32:path is mostly
> "path.c:899:TMP=c:\windows\temp"..."path.c:1178: Test failed: expected
> buf[0] upper case letter got c", probably people whose ~/.wine is old
> and has a windir that starts with a lowercase drive letter?! Has that
> changed recently?
>
I don't think it can be a stale
Wow, lots of people submitted test results for 1.0rc2 already!
I ran my skipgood filter on it, put the digested data up at
http://kegel.com/wine/failing-1.0-rc2.html
and added a little analysis to
http://wiki.winehq.org/MakeTestFailures
To wit:
-- snip ---
Tests that fail on most versions of Wind
Hello,
2008/5/24 Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Friday 23 May 2008 23:56:35 Austin English wrote:
>> Alexandre committed a few fixed to the README today, but I still see a
>> few things that may need fixing:
>>
>> ./tool/wineinstall - Has been mentioned to be deprecated a few times
>> in bugzi
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you press Tab in an msi dialog, focus moves the wrong way.
> You can confirm the correct tab order by viewing the msi
> file in Orca and looking at the Dialog and Control tables.
>
> It seems that tab order in user32 is eq
On Thursday 22 May 2008, Hartmut Figge wrote:
> Dan Kegel:
> >On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:40 AM, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> I think the proper thing to do is to install the DirectX runtime /
> >> redistributable. It installs all the DLLs and registers them in the
> >> registry e
This one's bugged me for ages, but I never tracked it down. Thanks!
--Juan
2008/5/24 Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am Samstag, 24. Mai 2008 10:33:42 schrieb H. Verbeet:
>> The color_match() function which this test introduces should be used
>> for the other visual tests that require an approximate match as well,
>> but doing this is outside the scope of this patc
Andrew Talbot wrote:
> Andrew Talbot wrote:
>
>> If the forum is the wrong place to raise this sort of query, please
>> forgive and advise. :)
>>
>
> Actually, Alexandre suggested that I file bug reports for things I find but
> can't fix myself. And I suppose an indentation anomaly is still a sor
Am Samstag, 24. Mai 2008 10:33:42 schrieb H. Verbeet:
> The color_match() function which this test introduces should be used
> for the other visual tests that require an approximate match as well,
> but doing this is outside the scope of this patch.
Dan recently added color_near() for this purpose.
Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, I think I'd rather have the old changelogs in the source
> package and leave it at that, and just include the current changelog
> in the binaries.
The old changelogs certainly won't be removed.
> Or, I suppose worst case (if the changelog is dro
James McKenzie skrev:
> Ove Kaaven wrote:
>> Alexandre Julliard skrev:
>>
>>> Objections? Does anybody feel a strong need for a Changelog file?
>>>
>>
>> I've used it a lot to look up when stuff might have been fixed (or
>> broken), and in general Debian packages are expected to ship a
>>
On Saturday 24 May 2008 20:04:14 Rob Shearman wrote:
> In the long term it would be better to use getaddrinfo instead of
> gethostbyname/gethostbyname_r, but that's too big a change for 1.0.
My thoughts exactly. I looked at getaddrinfo first but realized that
using it means writing new code, so I
Ove Kaaven wrote:
> Alexandre Julliard skrev:
>
>> Objections? Does anybody feel a strong need for a Changelog file?
>>
>
> I've used it a lot to look up when stuff might have been fixed (or
> broken), and in general Debian packages are expected to ship a changelog
> if possible.
>
>
>
On Saturday 24 May 2008 17:30:47 Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> > +ref = getRefcount(lpDD);
> > +ok(ref == 1, "Got refcount %ld, expected 2\n", ref);
> > +
> > +IDirectDraw_Release(lpDD);
> > +
> > +ref = getRefcount(lpDD);
> > +ok(ref == 0, "Got refcount %ld, expected 1\n", ref);
>
>
2008/5/19 Hans Leidekker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> @@ -151,7 +158,21 @@ BOOL GetAddress(LPCWSTR lpszServerName, INTERNET_PORT
> nServerPort,
> name = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), 0, sz+1);
> WideCharToMultiByte( CP_UNIXCP, 0, lpszServerName, len, name, sz, NULL,
> NULL );
> name[sz] =
2008/5/23 Maarten Lankhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ---
>
> *Don't apply, breaks tests*
>
> Rob: Is there anything wrong with this patch apart from the fact it
> stops the tests from running in wine due to a failure? Would it
> prevent windows failures?
>
> Ideally I would make our RpcMgmtIsServerLi
Alexandre Julliard skrev:
> Objections? Does anybody feel a strong need for a Changelog file?
I've used it a lot to look up when stuff might have been fixed (or
broken), and in general Debian packages are expected to ship a changelog
if possible.
> +ref = getRefcount(lpDD);
> +ok(ref == 1, "Got refcount %ld, expected 2\n", ref);
> +
> +IDirectDraw_Release(lpDD);
> +
> +ref = getRefcount(lpDD);
> +ok(ref == 0, "Got refcount %ld, expected 1\n", ref);
I think there's a copypaste error, it seems you forgot to adjust
Am Samstag, 24. Mai 2008 12:19:22 schrieb Alexandre Julliard:
> Objections? Does anybody feel a strong need for a Changelog file?
I'd say kill the changelog. I think I've never opened this file in my 4 years
I've been messing with wine
Scott Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A while back, Alexandre promised to wipe the changelog file "when we hit
> 1.0 or when it hits 4 gigabytes, whichever comes first."
>
> Well, it's about time. I suggest removing all changes for entries
> earlier than Wine 1.0-rc1, as having it completel
Austin English wrote:
> -Go to http://www.winehq.org/site/git for more information.
> +Go to http://www.winehq.org/site/git/ for more information.
this is not correct, second link returns 404 page.
Andrew Talbot wrote:
> If the forum is the wrong place to raise this sort of query, please
> forgive and advise. :)
>
Actually, Alexandre suggested that I file bug reports for things I find but
can't fix myself. And I suppose an indentation anomaly is still a sort of
bug(?)
--
Andy.
Hi,
In toolbar.c:TOOLBAR_Destroy(), should the "if" statement at line 5439 be
compound to match the indentation, or should the three invocations of
TOOLBAR_DeleteImageList() be outdented?
treeview.c:
In TREEVIEW_DeleteItem(), how conditional is the call of
TREEVIEW_SetFirstVisible() at line 15
James McKenzie wrote:
> Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
>> Bret Comstock Waldow wrote:
>>
>>> Otherwise, I need to know about the legality, and practicality, of a
>>> scheme such as I am proposing above. I'm hoping for comment, pointers,
>>> and perhaps help about writing it.
>>>
>>
>>
> Like Vi
On Friday 23 May 2008 23:56:35 Austin English wrote:
> Alexandre committed a few fixed to the README today, but I still see a
> few things that may need fixing:
>
> ./tool/wineinstall - Has been mentioned to be deprecated a few times
> in bugzilla. If it's deprecated, we need to remove it. If not,
James Hawkins wrote:
> A person using native Windows DLLs
> with Wine may be violating copyright law or the MS EULA if they don't
> own a licensed copy of Windows.
That is of no concern with what I'm doing, as only the person who owns
the Tablet PC and has the license for the copy of Tablet XP that
30 matches
Mail list logo
