As I wrote two years ago:
if we're expecting people to use Wine for real
work, maybe we should start doing that ourselves.
How's about everybody start using Wine for *everything*?
See http://wiki.winehq.org/DogfoodChallenge
"Maarten Lankhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These structures are on disk formats, so normal alignment rules don't
> apply here.
PSDK has a different idea about aviriff.h alignment.
--
Dmitry.
Hi Jeremy
2008/5/21 Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Steven Edwards wrote:
>> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> So it seems as though every month or so, some id10t is bit by
>>> the Thunderbird bug where it mangles perfectly reasonable looking
>>> git
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Reece Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/5/21 Austin English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Paul Vriens
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Austin English wrote:
In the past 2 days, when running the cross tests on my work XP bo
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Accept names both with and without dash after ISO.
>
> Fixes http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13340
>
> The ugly string comparison could be avoided by
> canonicalizing the input character set name,
> though that would mea
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Andrew Talbot
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Hawkins wrote:
>
>>
>> These interface implementations could even be made static.
>>
>
> That's true. I shall still leave this patch in for consideration, since I
> don't have time, right now, to properly consider wha
James Hawkins wrote:
>
> These interface implementations could even be made static.
>
That's true. I shall still leave this patch in for consideration, since I
don't have time, right now, to properly consider what can be made static in
this dll. I hope to do so another time.
Thanks,
--
Andy.
--- On Wed, 21/5/08, Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: fedora 9/gcc 4.3 internal compiler error with wine 1.0 rc1
> To: "Hin-Tak Leung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: wine-devel@winehq.org
> Date: Wednesday, 21 May, 2008, 9:46 PM
> On
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Andrew Talbot
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Changelog:
>wined3d: Remove unneeded "extern" from function definition.
>
> diff --git a/dlls/wined3d/surface.c b/dlls/wined3d/surface.c
> index 7a1a355..684690b 100644
> --- a/dlls/wined3d/surface.c
> +++ b/dlls/wined3
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 04:47:48PM +, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
> This is probably a bug with gcc 4.3, but just in case
> there are some people who are knowledgeable with gcc
> in wine-devel, who may want to fix gcc so that
> wine can be built on f9:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Austin English
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I mentioned compression a few months ago and got some positive replies. We
>> now only needs someone how implements this in winetest and at the backend.
> In the meantime, increasing the log size a little bit would help
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Paul Vriens
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Austin English wrote:
>>
>> In the past 2 days, when running the cross tests on my work XP box, I
>> keep getting an error that the log file is too big (1.6 Mb > 1.5 Mb
>> max). Anyone else seeing this? It's submitting parti
Austin English wrote:
> In the past 2 days, when running the cross tests on my work XP box, I
> keep getting an error that the log file is too big (1.6 Mb > 1.5 Mb
> max). Anyone else seeing this? It's submitting partial reports, which
> may or may not be useful. Can we get some compression going,
Hello Juan,
2008/5/21 Juan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Are the tests in devinst.c supposed so be run in order? IOW are they
>> supposed to bee cleaned up after each subtest or do they rely on each other?
>
> I'm sure I didn't put that much thought into making the tests order
> dependent. I wrote
In the past 2 days, when running the cross tests on my work XP box, I
keep getting an error that the log file is too big (1.6 Mb > 1.5 Mb
max). Anyone else seeing this? It's submitting partial reports, which
may or may not be useful. Can we get some compression going, or
increase the max log size?
Don't forget to cc wine-devel on replies..
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Michael Karcher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> do we define "rsaenh.dll" as "application"?
Not usually, as it's part of Windows and doesn't come with other applications.
> So we do not currently have the needed strings (th
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Josep Maria Antolín Segura
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am resending here the patch attached to the bug # 13112 on bugzilla,
> regarding
> the trackbar control of the comctl32.dll file.
You forgot to attach the patch.
--John
This is probably a bug with gcc 4.3, but just in case
there are some people who are knowledgeable with gcc
in wine-devel, who may want to fix gcc so that
wine can be built on f9:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445494
__
Juan Lang wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
>> Are the tests in devinst.c supposed so be run in order? IOW are they
>> supposed to bee cleaned up after each subtest or do they rely on each other?
>
> I'm sure I didn't put that much thought into making the tests order
> dependent. I wrote them, ran them, made
Steven Edwards wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So it seems as though every month or so, some id10t is bit by
>> the Thunderbird bug where it mangles perfectly reasonable looking
>> git-format-patch drafts.
>>
>> This month, I won the prize! :-)
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So it seems as though every month or so, some id10t is bit by
> the Thunderbird bug where it mangles perfectly reasonable looking
> git-format-patch drafts.
>
> This month, I won the prize! :-)
You mean your not using outl
> I didn't find a way yet (and didn't look to hard) to make the subkeys
> inherit these new permissions. Otherwise I have to do this for every key.
I don't think you can if you don't actually create the key. The
caller of RegCreateKeyEx is able to set the default DACL for the key,
and subkeys wil
So it seems as though every month or so, some id10t is bit by
the Thunderbird bug where it mangles perfectly reasonable looking
git-format-patch drafts.
This month, I won the prize! :-)
I had always habitually done --attach, because that's what GitWine says to do.
But after scratching my head, re
> are the string resource IDs (IDS_*) in crypt32.dll supposed to be
> compatible to the native Microsoft DLL?
Only if an app depends on this.
> The reason I am asking is that the native rsaenh.dll fails to load
> because of failing GetStringW calls for crypt32.dll. It is supposed to
> fail, or sh
Juan Lang wrote:
>> Now you tell me :-).
>>
>> I've something in place already to get rid of the stray registry keys. Just
>> needs some more thought and tweaking.
>
> Well that's even better! Feel free to send here for comments :)
> --Juan
>
It's a new function that just changes the permissions
> Now you tell me :-).
>
> I've something in place already to get rid of the stray registry keys. Just
> needs some more thought and tweaking.
Well that's even better! Feel free to send here for comments :)
--Juan
Hi Paul,
> Are the tests in devinst.c supposed so be run in order? IOW are they
> supposed to bee cleaned up after each subtest or do they rely on each other?
I'm sure I didn't put that much thought into making the tests order
dependent. I wrote them, ran them, made them into tests, and they
wor
Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 12:40:05 schrieb H. Verbeet:
> Sure, but I was under the impression we only care about d3dx9 here,
> not dplay etc.
That's up to Dan. He's maintaining winetricks, so I won't interfere with his
decisions.
I do not have ubuntu/mmap protection here, could you/somebody try with a
address like 0x8.
I've run the attached test program on Windows XP SP3, Hardy Heron 8.04, and
a Debian 'Lenny' system for the memory range of 0x0 through 0x11.
The results were that on Windows XP, you get partial
James Hawkins wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Juan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> anyone knows the exact testing causing the creation of the dummy devices?
>> I believe it's testRegisterDeviceInfo. See my comment in it:
>> * FIXME: the key also becomes undeletable. How to get rid o
> So... lots of people are going around installing
> all of directx, and maybe all they needed was, say,
> d3d9x_35. That's not good. This sounds like
> a job for winetricks!
> But I know nothing about direct3d. Could somebody
> have a look at this draft and see if it suffices? All
> I added wa
2008/5/21 Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> But I personally prefer installing the full runtime over copying the selected
> DLLs, because it provides a proper setup for the libraries, like
> self-registration, other libs like dplay, etc. Self-registration is
> especially important for directpl
Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 10:45:50 schrieb H. Verbeet:
> 2008/5/21 Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I think the proper thing to do is to install the DirectX runtime /
> > redistributable. It installs all the DLLs and registers them in the
> > registry etc.
>
> Isn't that what we're trying t
Dear developers,
are the string resource IDs (IDS_*) in crypt32.dll supposed to be
compatible to the native Microsoft DLL? It looks like the strings wine
has starting at 1000 are based at 8000 in the crypt32.dll provided with
XP. Since SP2, crypt32.dll has extra strings (e.g. at 7501 and
following
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 4:45 AM, H. Verbeet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/5/21 Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I think the proper thing to do is to install the DirectX runtime /
>> redistributable. It installs all the DLLs and registers them in the registry
>> etc.
>>
> Isn't that what
Me myself I install DX for these same reasons, but some people on IRC have
had objections to me telling people to do it
http://wine-review.blogspot.com/2008/03/directx-90c-march-2008-redistributable.html
And they tell people it will fry their config if they install DX.
When in fact if you
Juan Lang wrote:
>> anyone knows the exact testing causing the creation of the dummy devices?
>
> I believe it's testRegisterDeviceInfo. See my comment in it:
> * FIXME: the key also becomes undeletable. How to get rid of it?
>
> --Juan
>
Hi Juan,
Are the tests in devinst.c supposed so be run
2008/5/21 Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think the proper thing to do is to install the DirectX runtime /
> redistributable. It installs all the DLLs and registers them in the registry
> etc.
>
Isn't that what we're trying to avoid?
I think the proper thing to do is to install the DirectX runtime /
redistributable. It installs all the DLLs and registers them in the registry
etc.
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=740AC79A-5B72-447D-84F9-EE6407ED1A91&displaylang=en
The newest redist is downloadable wit
You could update winetricks at each DX redistributable release
the last one was in March. Me myself I would add all the d3d9x_*
dlls rather then just two of them, there are older games and benchmark
software that needs the older ones as well.
-Tom
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:41 AM, H. Verbeet <[EMA
2008/5/21 Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So... lots of people are going around installing
> all of directx, and maybe all they needed was, say,
> d3d9x_35. That's not good. This sounds like
> a job for winetricks!
> But I know nothing about direct3d. Could somebody
> have a look at this draft
41 matches
Mail list logo
