Re: user32: Use the PostMessage() for WM_IME_KEY{DOWN|UP} message

2008-04-20 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"ByeongSik Jeon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * MS Spi++ test result, PostMessage is right. > * Message generation sequence: > WM_IME_KEYDOWN -> WM_KEYDOWN -> WM_CHAR > WM_CHAR is genetated in the TranslateMessage() when we use > PostMessage() function. > * Real case: MS IME 2002, MS IME 200

Re: Regressions: the enemy of 1.0

2008-04-20 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Hi Dan, 2008/4/20, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > There's been lots of progress in Wine lately; many > important applications work better than ever. > But the inevitable cost of such progress is that > some applications are now broken and/or > wine has odd problems. > > For instance, as of

Re: Regressions: the enemy of 1.0

2008-04-20 Thread Steven Edwards
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's been lots of progress in Wine lately; many > important applications work better than ever. > But the inevitable cost of such progress is that > some applications are now broken and/or > wine has odd problems. Yes O

Re: [4/4] Add test for IDirectInputDevice_GetProperty of keyboard device for unicode and ascii case.

2008-04-20 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
Sergey Khodych wrote: > > > > > > +result = wcsncmp( dipsw.wsz, dipsa.wsz, sizeof( dipsw.wsz )/sizeof( > dipsw.wsz[0] ) ); UNIX unicode and windows unicode are two separate things. Don't use functions that work wit

Re: [1/4] dinput: Return error for unknown property.

2008-04-20 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
Sergey Khodych wrote: > > > -WARN("Unknown property %s\n", debugstr_guid(rguid)); > -break; > +FIXME("Unknown property %s\n", debugstr_guid(rguid)); > +return DIERR_UNSUPPORTED; I'd like to see tests for this. Also lots of programs will break becaus

Regressions: the enemy of 1.0

2008-04-20 Thread Dan Kegel
There's been lots of progress in Wine lately; many important applications work better than ever. But the inevitable cost of such progress is that some applications are now broken and/or wine has odd problems. For instance, as of the last two versions of Wine, StarUML can't be unminimized ( http://

MSIME support causing slow setup until explorer.exe paused?

2008-04-20 Thread Dan Kegel
I tried installing StarUML (after doing winetricks vcrun6 msxml3, as required), and the setup crept along very slowly... so I got curious and ran top. Most of the cpu time was being used by Explorer and wineserver, and interestingly, if I suspended Explorer by doing strace -p and then pressing ^

Re: Wine countdown?

2008-04-20 Thread TheBlunderbuss
Dan Kegel wrote: > Anybody seen the nifty countdown logo that Ubuntu is using? > http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/countdown > Maybe we should do something similar for Wine. Yes we should!

Wine 1.0 status: T minus 54 days, 63 bugs to go. Code freeze in 12 days.

2008-04-20 Thread Dan Kegel
See http://kegel.com/wine/countdown.html for a current (and clickable) status report. Here's what it says now: Wine Release Countdown Wine 1.0 countdown: 54 days to release, 12 days to freeze! See WineReleasePlan for details. wine-0.9.60 was released on Friday, April 20th, 2008. According t

Re: Strange struct alignment errors?

2008-04-20 Thread Dan Kegel
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 12:52 AM, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://test.winehq.org/data/94883af56d7348228963d7e70a5af578310c2228/wine_xp_icc-3/ntdll:generated.txt > > If the tag (wine_xp_icc-3) is any hint, the tests were compiled with > icc, which might not handle the alig

Re: Strange struct alignment errors?

2008-04-20 Thread James Hawkins
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 2:45 AM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://test.winehq.org/data/94883af56d7348228963d7e70a5af578310c2228/wine_xp_icc-3/ntdll:generated.txt > looks kinda funny. Is somebody compiling the tests > wrong somehow? > If the tag (wine_xp_icc-3) is any hint, the test

Strange struct alignment errors?

2008-04-20 Thread Dan Kegel
http://test.winehq.org/data/94883af56d7348228963d7e70a5af578310c2228/wine_xp_icc-3/ntdll:generated.txt looks kinda funny. Is somebody compiling the tests wrong somehow?