Does anyone use gdb attach to debug pthread winelib applications? I've had a
lot of problems with winedbg and winedbg --gdb, but have gdb attach working
well except I can't debug threads. Breakpoints in threads crash the app and
I have no thread info.
gdb attach works fine with non-winelib pthrea
Am Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2008 10:54:28 schrieb Alexander Dorofeyev:
> I ran a little test, it didn't show any differences in Wine or XP in such
> case (D3DTA_TEXTURE alpha selected and no alpha in texture pixelformat).
> This seems to give alpha=1.0. I found nothing on this at msdn, but it more
> or
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/showthread.php?t=61219
complains that IFI_Loader doesn't work at all in Wine.
I haven't tried doing serial I/O with it, but it installs
and starts fine. If somebody who's into serial I/O could
give it a spin, it might turn up some problems.
(Or maybe they were jus
Louis. Lenders wrote:
> Hi, i send this to wine-patches for review (by Jacek i guess). A user
> submitted garbage test results for Segamic:
> http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/semagic/Semagic1709for2k.exe?download
>
> It's the second time i see an app failing on PersistMemory_Load
> returning E_NO
Now how did that one slip in. Reading the diff before sending is a bit
hard, since there are so many typos, they get hard to track. I'll
resend in a couple minutes. Thanks for catching it.
-Austin
On Jan 10, 2008 11:20 AM, Jonathan Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On jeu, 2008-01-10 at 10:53
On jeu, 2008-01-10 at 10:53 -0600, Austin English wrote:
> - * which is essentially an input, is the destiantion register
> because it is the first
> - * param. According to the msdn, this must be register r5, but
> let's keep it more flexible
> + * which is essentially an input, is th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Okay, I now have spent some time on analysing the differences of the dlls
> (at least regarding to what functions they provide). So just a few questions
> from my side to make sure the next version of the patch will be what you
> expect:
> 1. Really just to ensure that
> Please stop resending that big patch again and again, it's not going in,
> it's full of problems. You need to provide correct forwards for all
> functions instead of stubs, and the functions need to match the Windows
> ones, you can't just copy the same spec file 12 times. Also the code was
> wri
On 10/01/2008, Maarten Lankhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Divan Burger schreef:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What is the preferred number of spaces of indentation? In
> > comdlg32/colordlg.c it is either one or three spaces and there are a
> > few places where there is no indentation and where things are ra
Divan Burger schreef:
> Hi,
>
> What is the preferred number of spaces of indentation? In
> comdlg32/colordlg.c it is either one or three spaces and there are a
> few places where there is no indentation and where things are randomly
> indented or switches between amounts of indentation.
>
Some
Hi,
What is the preferred number of spaces of indentation? In
comdlg32/colordlg.c it is either one or three spaces and there are a
few places where there is no indentation and where things are randomly
indented or switches between amounts of indentation.
What is the policy on when to change inden
On Jan 10, 2008 6:25 AM, Alistair Leslie-Hughes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As Lei pointed out in a email.
>
>
> There's already a bug [1] filed for it and Dmitry is in the process of
> fixing it. You should give his latest patch [2] a try.
>
> - Lei
>
> [1] http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id
"Steven Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry I've not filed a bug report for this or dug in to it more, I am
> a little short on time. I've got a clean tree and am trying to install
> Office 97 and it seems to have totally regressed. A clean build from a
> few days ago installed flawlessly.
"Steven Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I've not filed a bug report for this or dug in to it more, I am
> a little short on time. I've got a clean tree and am trying to install
> Office 97 and it seems to have totally regressed. A clean build f
Andrey Turkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> @@ -494,7 +494,11 @@ static int ProcessWindowsFileProtection(void)
> strcatW( dllcache, dllcacheW );
> }
>
> -find_handle = FindFirstFileW(dllcache,&finddata);
> +dllcache_wildcard = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), 0, strlenW( dllcach
Hi,
Sorry I've not filed a bug report for this or dug in to it more, I am
a little short on time. I've got a clean tree and am trying to install
Office 97 and it seems to have totally regressed. A clean build from a
few days ago installed flawlessly. I've made clean and reconfigured
twice now and
Stefan Leichter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +#define MAP_STR(str) \
> +do { \
> +if (configW->str) \
> +{ \
> +DWORD sz = WideCharToMultiByte( CP_ACP, 0, configW->str, -1, p,
> n, NULL, NULL ); \
> +if (!sz) { \
> +FIXME("WideCharToMul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Forwarding d3dx9_24...35 functions to d3dx9_36 now.
Please stop resending that big patch again and again, it's not going in,
it's full of problems. You need to provide correct forwards for all
functions instead of stubs, and the functions need to match the Windows
ones
Whilst on the subject of Bugzilla email settings, is
it possible to add a message to Bugzilla emails asking
users not to reply, but to post in Bugzilla?
There's now often up to 5 replies a day sent directly
to [EMAIL PROTECTED], instead of being posted in
Bugzilla.
Thanks,
Luke
_
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:12:22AM +0100, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> On Thursday 10 January 2008 09:49:47 Marcus Meissner wrote:
>
> > Coverity spotted "arg" as potentially NULL dereferenced
> > and the originating condition looks broken to me.
> >
> > It should not really handle "delim", but just ch
Rolf Kalbermatter wrote:
> Robert Shearman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> No. Everything (except multi-dimensional arrays, possibly)
>> can already be done by the code we output already. Adding
>> code to output -Oicf proc format strings in widl would be
>> possible, but unnecessary.
>
On Thursday 10 January 2008 09:49:47 Marcus Meissner wrote:
> Coverity spotted "arg" as potentially NULL dereferenced
> and the originating condition looks broken to me.
>
> It should not really handle "delim", but just check arg.
Agreed, but there's another occurrence of this check in msvcrt_arg
22 matches
Mail list logo
