Re: recent cedega contributions to wine

2007-11-18 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Montag, 19. November 2007 08:13:49 schrieb EA Durbin: > http://www.cedega.com./devreports/ > > The latest Cedega dev report states it plans to include wine's msi > implementation back into it's code base and they have been contributing > back to wine. > > "TransGaming's developers have been cont

recent cedega contributions to wine

2007-11-18 Thread EA Durbin
http://www.cedega.com./devreports/ The latest Cedega dev report states it plans to include wine's msi implementation back into it's code base and they have been contributing back to wine. "TransGaming's developers have been contributing some changes back to Wine as well, including in severa

Re: Unimplemented function KERNEL32.dll.FindFirstVolumeW

2007-11-18 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 10:14:17PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello Hans, > > thanks for that info. > > latest version i tried here is > > wine-0.9.49-11.3.i586.rpm > wine-snapshot-0.9.49.20071118-11.1.i586.rpm > > but same error. > maybe that`s not recent enough ? > > do i ne

Re: Wine and LD_PRELOAD

2007-11-18 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Nov 19, 2007 12:48 AM, Lionel Tricon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 18 November 2007 20:14:41 Stefan Dösinger wrote: > > I think wine dlopen()s many libraries instead of linking dynamically to > > them. This makes the build environment more independent of the runtime > > environment, and

Re: Removing Windows and Solaris from the Downloads page

2007-11-18 Thread Steven Edwards
Hi, On Nov 18, 2007 8:03 PM, Juan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem with using winsock rather than UNIX sockets is in the I/O > between a client process and the wineserver. The extra overhead it > imposes is really unavoidable, AFAICT. We're doing a context switch > to a separate pro

Re: msi: Install Entire Feature

2007-11-18 Thread James Hawkins
On 11/18/07, Daniel Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Install entire feature" enabled and implemented. > What is this patch for? Is this to fix a bug? +/* FIXME: Why 0x1000? */ Don't add random comments about things you don't understand in the code. +msi_seltree_install_entire_feature(HWND

Re: Removing Windows and Solaris from the Downloads page

2007-11-18 Thread Juan Lang
Hi Steven, > The problem is not in the makefiles, a lot of the problem is that we > are not clear on which dlls would be of use for testing in windows. I > had to go through hoops to get wininet buildable on Windows because it > uses unix sockets on Wine rather than winsock. There was quite a > pe

Re: Wine and LD_PRELOAD

2007-11-18 Thread Lionel Tricon
On Sunday 18 November 2007 20:14:41 Stefan Dösinger wrote: > I think wine dlopen()s many libraries instead of linking dynamically to > them. This makes the build environment more independent of the runtime > environment, and we can provide binary builds with all features enabled, > and they will st

Re: Unimplemented function KERNEL32.dll.FindFirstVolumeW

2007-11-18 Thread devzero
Hello Hans, thanks for that info. latest version i tried here is wine-0.9.49-11.3.i586.rpm wine-snapshot-0.9.49.20071118-11.1.i586.rpm but same error. maybe that`s not recent enough ? do i need to enable special option or add some files ? sorry, i`m quite new to wine and maybe i sho

Re: Removing Windows and Solaris from the Downloads page

2007-11-18 Thread Steven Edwards
On Nov 17, 2007 6:04 AM, Maarten Lankhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The question is what dlls should we include? Something like the d3d > dll's would be useful, and a lot of other dll's (mshtml, shdocvw, etc) > probably too. Unfortunately wine won't build on mingw properly,if you > try a 'make'

Re: Unimplemented function KERNEL32.dll.FindFirstVolumeW

2007-11-18 Thread Hans Leidekker
On Sunday 18 November 2007 22:14:17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > latest version i tried here is > > wine-0.9.49-11.3.i586.rpm > wine-snapshot-0.9.49.20071118-11.1.i586.rpm > > but same error. > maybe that`s not recent enough ? > > do i need to enable special option or add some files ? Y

Re: Unimplemented function KERNEL32.dll.FindFirstVolumeW

2007-11-18 Thread Hans Leidekker
On Sunday 18 November 2007 20:38:34 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > i`m new to wine. > I tried windirstat under wine-0.9.44-15 and crossover-office 6.2.0-1 under > opensuse10.3 - but it doesn`t work. > > i`m getting > wine: Call from 0x7b8447d0 to unimplemented function > KERNEL32.dll.FindFirstVolu

Unimplemented function KERNEL32.dll.FindFirstVolumeW

2007-11-18 Thread devzero
Hello ! i`m new to wine. I tried windirstat under wine-0.9.44-15 and crossover-office 6.2.0-1 under opensuse10.3 - but it doesn`t work. i`m getting wine: Call from 0x7b8447d0 to unimplemented function KERNEL32.dll.FindFirstVolumeW, aborting wine: Unimplemented function KERNEL32.dll.FindFirstVo

Re: advapi32/service.c -- remove untriggerable check

2007-11-18 Thread Robert Shearman
Dan Kegel wrote: > Uwe wrote: > >> Gerald Pfeifer writes: >> >> >>> n is of type DWORD which is unsigned, so n < 0 always will >>> evaluate to false. >>> >> Is dropping the check the right answer? Shouldn't the check test for high >> values like > 0xff00 and report a possible problem

Re: Wine and LD_PRELOAD

2007-11-18 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Sonntag, 18. November 2007 17:13:20 schrieb Lionel Tricon: > Hi wine list, > > I am currently working for the next generation of the klik project (1 > application = 1 file) and we actualy face some troubles with picasa which > is running under linux thanks to wine. > > It seems that wine deal ba

Wine and LD_PRELOAD

2007-11-18 Thread Lionel Tricon
Hi wine list, I am currently working for the next generation of the klik project (1 application = 1 file) and we actualy face some troubles with picasa which is running under linux thanks to wine. It seems that wine deal badly with the LD_PRELOAD feature which is one of the main composant we u

Re: gdi32: Add stub for RemoveFontMemResourceEx

2007-11-18 Thread Klaus Layer
Am Sonntag, 18. November 2007 14:15:23 schrieb Dmitry Timoshkov: > You forgot to create WineEngRemoveFontMemResourceEx implementation for > a case when HAVE_FREETYPE is not defined. > > -- > Dmitry. > Dimitry, thanks for reviewing the patch. I just resent the patch together with the missing imp

re: advapi32/service.c -- remove untriggerable check

2007-11-18 Thread Dan Kegel
Uwe wrote: >Gerald Pfeifer writes: > >> n is of type DWORD which is unsigned, so n < 0 always will >> evaluate to false. > > Is dropping the check the right answer? Shouldn't the check test for high > values like > 0xff00 and report a possible problem? Indeed. IMHO we don't need patches like this,

Re: advapi32/service.c -- remove untriggerable check

2007-11-18 Thread Uwe Bonnes
> "Gerald" == Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Gerald> n is of type DWORD which is unsigned, so n < 0 always will Gerald> evaluate to false. Gerald> Gerald Gerald> ChangeLog: Remove untriggerable check. Gerald> Index: dlls/advapi32/service.c Gerald> ===

Re: Valgrind results for Nov 12 & 13

2007-11-18 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Dan Kegel wrote: > Oh, he'd undoubtedly prefer ignoring to memsetting. > I believe the "official" answer is to teach valgrind which fields are important for which server request. Granted, it a lot more work, but it's the only way we will actually catch errors :-) Shachar

Re: bits: Added framework for testing the BackgroundCopyJob interface (25/27)

2007-11-18 Thread Detlef Riekenberg
On Fr, 2007-11-16 at 16:21 -0800, Roy Shea wrote: > +/* Generic test setup */ > +static BOOL setup(void) unused code > +/* Generic test cleanup */ > +static void teardown(void) unused code +START_TEST(job) > +{ > +CoInitialize(NULL); > +CoUninitialize(); > +} Do you want to call "setu

Re: bits: INF and resource file for qmgr registration (8/27)

2007-11-18 Thread Detlef Riekenberg
On Fr, 2007-11-16 at 16:16 -0800, Roy Shea wrote: > dlls/qmgr/qmgr.inf | 32 > dlls/qmgr/rsrc.rc | 21 + > 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) The change for Makefile.in to add rsrc.rc is missing here. (found in the next pat

Re: gdi32: Add stub for RemoveFontMemResourceEx

2007-11-18 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Klaus Layer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nokia PC Suite installation crashes due to missing function > RemoveFontMemResourceEx. This patch adds function RemoveFontMemResourceEx > which just calls WineEngRemoveFontMemResourceEx as stub You forgot to create WineEngRemoveFontMemResourceEx implem

Re: Removing Windows and Solaris from the Downloads page

2007-11-18 Thread Paul Millar
On Saturday 17 November 2007 12:04:36 Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Roderick Colenbrander schreef: > > They should get updated. In case of Solaris there are some bugs which > > prevent it from running I think. In case of Windows someone needs to > > update the package. It is very useful to use some of

Re: svchost: Added base implementation of svchost (1/27)

2007-11-18 Thread Robert Shearman
Roy Shea wrote: > +TOPSRCDIR = @top_srcdir@ > +TOPOBJDIR = ../.. > +SRCDIR= @srcdir@ > +VPATH = @srcdir@ > +MODULE= svchost.exe > +APPMODE = -municode > +IMPORTS = advapi32 kernel32 ole32 > I can't see any reason why svchost needs to import ole32. -- Rob Shearman