re: #winehq admin troubles

2007-11-05 Thread Dan Kegel
Luke Bratch wrote: > After seeing Vitamin deal with people for a long time > now, I can say I totally agree with how he does > things. Technically, he's spot on. It's his bedside manner that is broken. We really don't want him on the front line of support, somebody else should do that. But once th

Re: [SPAM] Re: USER32: win16 applications should not see long filenames returned from dialog control (try 2)

2007-11-05 Thread Juan Lang
> Sorry, but I have to object. According to the documentation in MSDN, > DlgDirSelectExA returns nonzero when the current selection is a > directory name, and zero when it is not. Ah, right you are. Thanks for correcting me. Objection withdrawn. --Juan

Re: [SPAM] Re: USER32: win16 applications should not see long filenames returned from dialog control (try 2)

2007-11-05 Thread Alex Villací­s Lasso
Juan Lang escribió: >> What do you think about this version? >> > > Better, but still not correct: > +ret = DlgDirSelectExA( WIN_Handle32(hwnd), buffer, MAX_PATH, id ); > +if (GetLastError() == 0) GetShortPathNameA(buffer, str, len); > > You shouldn't check GetLastError() for whether D

Re: #winehq admin troubles

2007-11-05 Thread Tom Wickline
On 11/5/07, Marcel Partap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If people really are expected to know everything there is to know > > before they try to help, is it really such a wonder that there's only > > a few solid contributors left, and they're stressed from it? > Absolutly not. That's why imho, t

Re: USER32: win16 applications should not see long filenames returned from dialog control (try 2)

2007-11-05 Thread Juan Lang
> What do you think about this version? Better, but still not correct: +ret = DlgDirSelectExA( WIN_Handle32(hwnd), buffer, MAX_PATH, id ); +if (GetLastError() == 0) GetShortPathNameA(buffer, str, len); You shouldn't check GetLastError() for whether DlgDirSelectExA succeeded. Rather, just

Re: #winehq admin troubles

2007-11-05 Thread Marcel Partap
> If people really are expected to know everything there is to know > before they try to help, is it really such a wonder that there's only > a few solid contributors left, and they're stressed from it? Absolutly not. That's why imho, the #winehq should be taken off the homepage. The newly create

Re: #winehq admin troubles

2007-11-05 Thread Jeremy White
Hi, >>> I agree that this isn't something that should continue. Kicking should >>> be reserved for people being disruptive. There is no reason to be >>> anything other than polite to users asking for help. >> How much time do you spend in #winehq? I know I don't spend much time there, >> but I kno

Re: Linux/Windows app connection, how?

2007-11-05 Thread Francois Gouget
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Josh Scholar wrote: [...] > OK. I need to access COM to do this, and I notice that in "What it WINELIB" > it says "Also missing are some of the more exotic features of Microsoft's > compiler like native COM support". What won't work is if you're using statements such as '#impo

Re: #winehq admin troubles

2007-11-05 Thread Chris Morgan
On 11/5/07, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 05 November 2007 06:12:42 Chris Morgan wrote: > > > I agree that this isn't something that should continue. Kicking should > > be reserved for people being disruptive. There is no reason to be > > anything other than polite to users asking

Re: Linux/Windows app connection, how?

2007-11-05 Thread Juan Lang
Hi Josh, (please bottom-post on this list.) > OK. I need to access COM to do this... I don't know why you need COM to do this. If you're writing the app yourself, why not just use a socket? > Unfortunately, I've never really understood COM very well. Is there an IDL > compiler for WINE? I

#winehq admin troubles

2007-11-05 Thread Luke Bratch
Chris Morgan wrote: > Allowing this kind of behavior to continue reflects poorly on us as a > community. I'd like to suggest that this be the last time we hear > about issues like this. If it happens again I'd like to propose a > graduated scale of irc channel bans, starting at one month, for > Vi

Re: #winehq admin troubles

2007-11-05 Thread Chris Howe
On Nov 5, 2007 11:51 AM, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I absolutely agree. Helping people in #winehq is a really bad job. Many people > who go there seem to expect you to wave your magic wand to make their problem > go away with zero effort from their side, and to make that instant

Re: mshtml #3: Store HTMLDocument pointer in BSCallback object.

2007-11-05 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Jacek Caban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --- > dlls/mshtml/mshtml_private.h |5 - > dlls/mshtml/navigate.c | 27 --- > dlls/mshtml/persist.c|2 +- > dlls/mshtml/task.c |7 --- > 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-

Re: libs/wine: Avoid compiler warnings about unused parameter(-W)

2007-11-05 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Detlef Riekenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Changelog: > libs/wine: Avoid compiler warnings about unused parameter(-W) > > The code-sequence is optimized away. > Another option would be "__attribute__((unused__))" > or removing the function. The best option is to not enable the warning. There

Re: Linux/Windows app connection, how?

2007-11-05 Thread Josh Scholar
OK. I need to access COM to do this, and I notice that in "What it WINELIB" it says "Also missing are some of the more exotic features of Microsoft's compiler like native COM support". I'm hoping that "native COM support" just means some new fancy add-on that wasn't in Visual Studio 6.0, and that

Re: #winehq admin troubles

2007-11-05 Thread feba thatl
> On 11/5/07, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 05 November 2007 11:49:52 Hans Leidekker wrote: > > On Monday 05 November 2007 10:39:32 Kai Blin wrote: > > > Personally, I would like to see more people stepping up to help run > > > #winehq instead of just complainin

Re: USER32: win16 applications should not see long filenames returned from dialog control (try 2)

2007-11-05 Thread Robert Shearman
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > "Alex Villacís Lasso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> BOOL16 WINAPI DlgDirSelectEx16( HWND16 hwnd, LPSTR str, INT16 len, INT16 id >> ) >> { >> -return DlgDirSelectExA( WIN_Handle32(hwnd), str, len, id ); >> +BOOL16 ret = DlgDirSelectExA( WIN_Handle32(hwnd),

Re: #winehq admin troubles

2007-11-05 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Montag, 5. November 2007 10:39:32 schrieb Kai Blin: > On Monday 05 November 2007 06:12:42 Chris Morgan wrote: > > I agree that this isn't something that should continue. Kicking should > > be reserved for people being disruptive. There is no reason to be > > anything other than polite to users a

Re: 'kernel32_test loader' causes BSOD on XP SP1

2007-11-05 Thread Francois Gouget
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: [...] > A proper fix would be either to remove that particular test altogether, or > replace 0x1000 by 0x200. Oops, I see that in the patch I sent it was still set to 0xf00 which was just an experiment. Setting it to 0x200 works for me. I'm sending a p

Re: USER32: win16 applications should not see long filenames returned from dialog control (try 2)

2007-11-05 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Alex Villacís Lasso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BOOL16 WINAPI DlgDirSelectEx16( HWND16 hwnd, LPSTR str, INT16 len, INT16 id ) > { > -return DlgDirSelectExA( WIN_Handle32(hwnd), str, len, id ); > +BOOL16 ret = DlgDirSelectExA( WIN_Handle32(hwnd), str, len, id ); > +GetShortPathName

RE: #winehq admin troubles

2007-11-05 Thread EA Durbin
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: wine-devel@winehq.org> Subject: Re: #winehq admin troubles> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 12:09:18 +0100> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> On Monday 05 November 2007 11:49:52 Hans Leidekker wrote:>> On Monday 05 November 2

Re: #winehq admin troubles

2007-11-05 Thread Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
On Monday 05 November 2007 11:49:52 Hans Leidekker wrote: > On Monday 05 November 2007 10:39:32 Kai Blin wrote: > > Personally, I would like to see more people stepping up to help run > > #winehq instead of just complaining about the work of one of the very few > > people who actually are out there

Re: 'kernel32_test loader' causes BSOD on XP SP1

2007-11-05 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Francois Gouget" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So I'm running tests in an XP SP1 VM and yet, you can see no such > results on http://test.winehq.org/data/. The reason for is that the > 'kernel32_test loader' causes XP SP1 to crash, so that winetest.exe > never has an opportunity to send the res

Re: #winehq admin troubles

2007-11-05 Thread Hans Leidekker
On Monday 05 November 2007 10:39:32 Kai Blin wrote: > Personally, I would like to see more people stepping up to help run #winehq > instead of just complaining about the work of one of the very few people who > actually are out there helping users. As I understand this history feba thatl tried

Re: #winehq admin troubles

2007-11-05 Thread feba thatl
>The line above is very important. I think it had to be sent to the channel. >Please imagine yourself saying: >(09:33:15 PM) vitamin: usrl, this will not help, as 0.9.47 and 0.9.48 are >still broken for most Source games. See, exactly. There is no reason to kick someone for making a comment and t

Re: Linux/Windows app connection, how?

2007-11-05 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Hello Joshua, Joshua Scholar schreef: > I really want to have some way to communicate between a Linux program and > a Windows program running under WINE. The connection doesn't need to be > high speed, a stream is fine - I'm just sending some unicode text. I'm > writing both programs myself,

Re: #winehq admin troubles

2007-11-05 Thread Kai Blin
On Monday 05 November 2007 06:12:42 Chris Morgan wrote: > I agree that this isn't something that should continue. Kicking should > be reserved for people being disruptive. There is no reason to be > anything other than polite to users asking for help. How much time do you spend in #winehq? I know

Re: #winehq admin troubles

2007-11-05 Thread darckness
>> I agree that this isn't something that should continue. Kicking >> should be reserved for people being disruptive. There is no reason >> to be anything other than polite to users asking for help. >> >> Allowing this kind of behavior to continue reflects poorly on us as a >> community. I'd like t

Re: #winehq admin troubles

2007-11-05 Thread Pavel Troller
Hi! Please, people, live in love and peace :-)! I think I see what happened... Parts of the previous mail are swapped, it's better for the explanation. Vitamin said: > > You omitted the reason: > > Nov 04 20:30:56 Gunn: that's an old version. Go to winehq.org and > follow their instructions

Linux/Windows app connection, how?

2007-11-05 Thread Joshua Scholar
I really want to have some way to communicate between a Linux program and a Windows program running under WINE. The connection doesn't need to be high speed, a stream is fine - I'm just sending some unicode text. I'm writing both programs myself, so I can implement this in the easiest way, th

Re: #winehq admin troubles

2007-11-05 Thread Martin Bosner
On Monday 05 November 2007 08:09:03 Tom Wickline wrote: > On 11/5/07, Chris Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree that this isn't something that should continue. Kicking should > > be reserved for people being disruptive. There is no reason to be > > anything other than polite to users aski