On 11/5/07, Chris Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree that this isn't something that should continue. Kicking should
> be reserved for people being disruptive. There is no reason to be
> anything other than polite to users asking for help.
>
> Allowing this kind of behavior to continue re
feba thatl wrote:
>
> (09:32:56 PM) The topic for #winehq is:[long topic removed]
> (09:33:09 PM) ***vitamin fucking tired all knowning noobs!
> (09:33:15 PM) : wine: cannot
> find '/media/cdrom0/intro.exe'
> (09:33:15 PM) vitamin: usrl, you better leave
> (09:33:25 PM) usrl: Why?
> (09:33:32 PM)
On 11/4/07, feba thatl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry if this mailing list is less than appropriate, but from what
> I've seen this is where the conversation was last time, and there
> doesn't seem to be much better.
>
> A while ago (Probably one-three months), I went to #winehq to ask
> about
Sorry if this mailing list is less than appropriate, but from what
I've seen this is where the conversation was last time, and there
doesn't seem to be much better.
A while ago (Probably one-three months), I went to #winehq to ask
about something, and was treated rather rudely by vitamin. I got
an
Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
> Changelog:
> libs/wine: Avoid compiler warnings about unused parameter(-W)
>
>
> The code-sequence is optimized away.
> Another option would be "__attribute__((unused__))"
> or removing the function.
>
> -
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 01:04:02PM +0100, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
>
> Why is the code only used, when "WANT_NEAR_INDICATION" is defined?
> Should we remove the code or enable it always?
>
> @@ -591,18 +592,17 @@ static void generic_msg(const char *s, c
> fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:%d: %s: ", pp
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>> Not a patch I am particularily proud of, but the best way I found to get
>> rid of
>>
>> listview.c:5043: warning: 'strW' might be used uninitialized in this
>> function
>>
>> issued by GCC, and apart from the added cast it actually is simpler t
Hi Gerald,
On Nov 3, 2007 9:58 AM, Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dlls/wsock32/socket.c has the following code:
>
>DWORD routeTableSize, numRoutes, ndx, ret;
>
>numRoutes = min(routeTableSize - sizeof(MIB_IPFORWARDTABLE),
>0) / sizeof(MIB_IPFORWARDROW) + 1;
So I'm running tests in an XP SP1 VM and yet, you can see no such
results on http://test.winehq.org/data/. The reason for is that the
'kernel32_test loader' causes XP SP1 to crash, so that winetest.exe
never has an opportunity to send the results.
So I investigated this and the specific test t
On Saturday 06 October 2007 17:12:51 Dan Kegel wrote:
> On 10/6/07, Jesse Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > http://wiki.winehq.org/WineReleaseCriteria
> >
> > Can find get a timeline for the feature freeze and the 1.0 release?
>
> As the wiki page says, we hope to have a "final" list of bugs
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
