H. Verbeet wrote:
> On 21/10/2007, Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> GLSL maybe, but not FBO. It causes major slowdown in most source games. And
>> I'm talking about drop to 0.1 FPS. If that can be fixed then I don't see
>> major reasons why FBO can't be the default. If anything it doe
On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 19:33 +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Reece Dunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 20/10/2007, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Reece Dunn wrote:
> >> > The patch was rejected by Alexandre because the patch was
> >> > implementing that command using Windows API
On Sunday 21 October 2007 21:11:53 Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Jan Zerebecki wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 12:12:27PM +0200, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
wrote:
> >> On Saturday 20 October 2007 19:40:48 Tony Lambregts wrote:
> >>> I know that maintainer requests have gone through and are working
> Why can't the ping request be forwarded to the linux ping executable that I
> have the ability to run rather than trying to open a new raw socket which I
> don't have permission to do?
Patches always welcome.
--Juan
On 21/10/2007, Vitaliy Margolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GLSL maybe, but not FBO. It causes major slowdown in most source games. And
> I'm talking about drop to 0.1 FPS. If that can be fixed then I don't see
> major reasons why FBO can't be the default. If anything it does fix a lot of
> lighti
> Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:26:58
-0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: icmp states
I need to be running wine as root> CC: wine-devel@winehq.org>>> I can ping in
linux without being a superuser? Isn't there another way to do
> "EA" == EA Durbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
EA> I can ping in linux without being a superuser? Isn't there another
EA> way to do this than with SOCK_RAW, or having to run wine as root?
> ls -l /bin/ping
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 39496 25. Nov 2006 /bin/ping
ping is suid root. Ca
> I can ping in linux without being a superuser? Isn't there another way to do
> this than with SOCK_RAW, or having to run wine as root?
I think you mean the first sentence as a statement, not a question.
And yes you can, sort of: the ping executable is suid root. It runs
as root, regardless of
> Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:05:15
-0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: icmp states
I need to be running wine as root> CC: wine-devel@winehq.org I thought wine
was not to be run as root, is this not correct?>> It's not th
> > I thought wine was not to be run as root, is this not correct?
> It's not the ICMP you need to look at but "SOCK_RAW". This is not supported
> for regular users, only superuser.
So to be clear: we strongly recommend against running Wine as root.
But you sometimes need to run Wine as root in o
EA Durbin wrote:
> I tried to update the Ocean application as outlined in bug 8332 and got a
> message from the console stating I needed to be running as root for ICMP to
> work. I thought wine was not to be run as root, is this not correct?
>
> int sid=socket(AF_INET,SOCK_RAW,IPPROTO_ICMP);
>
I tried to update the Ocean application as outlined in bug 8332 and got a
message from the console stating I needed to be running as root for ICMP to
work. I thought wine was not to be run as root, is this not correct?
int sid=socket(AF_INET,SOCK_RAW,IPPROTO_ICMP);
if (sid < 0) {
Jan Zerebecki wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 12:12:27PM +0200, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes wrote:
>> On Saturday 20 October 2007 19:40:48 Tony Lambregts wrote:
>>> I know that maintainer requests have gone through and are working but
>>> apparently there has to be something wrong with this, since
Hello,
http://dmt.mhilfe.de/ is a tool to read out DSL-line parameters. The windows
version knows about a lot of DSL Modems, while a linux rewrite only knows of
a small amount of modems. Running as root, because of an ICMP call in the
program to find the DSL modem in the network, the program runs
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 12:12:27PM +0200, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes wrote:
> On Saturday 20 October 2007 19:40:48 Tony Lambregts wrote:
> > I know that maintainer requests have gone through and are working but
> > apparently there has to be something wrong with this, since you are not the
> > onl
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> On Sunday 21 October 2007 18:57:10 Steve Brown wrote:
>
>> mach.c:210: error: parse error before 'state'
>> mach.c:211: error: 'state' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> mach.c:245: error: 'x86_DEBUG_STATE32' undeclared (first use in this
>
> Se
Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes wrote:
> These don't really say much about how an application works.
>
>
Why wouldn't you want to see game menu? I think that's a bit way too much.
Then the next step would be to require movie of the actual game play?
Installers - yeah it's a bit irrelevant. However e
On Sunday 21 October 2007 18:57:10 Steve Brown wrote:
> mach.c:210: error: parse error before 'state'
> mach.c:211: error: 'state' undeclared (first use in this function)
> mach.c:245: error: 'x86_DEBUG_STATE32' undeclared (first use in this
See this bug:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7
Hi All,
Trying to build Wine 0.9.47 on an Intel MacBook Pro (2.16GHz Core
Duo) compilation stops at:
mach.c: In function 'get_thread_context':
mach.c:166: error: 'x86_debug_state32_t' undeclared (first use in this
function)
mach.c:166: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported o
H. Verbeet wrote:
> On 21/10/2007, Scott Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Speaking of which, why do we still not have a GUI option for them in
>> winecfg?
>>
>> And, more to the point, are they nearly stable enough to be default yet?
>>
> They should probably be default these days.
>
>
GLSL
"Reece Dunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20/10/2007, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Reece Dunn wrote:
>> > The patch was rejected by Alexandre because the patch was
>> > implementing that command using Windows API calls,
>> > when it should be implemented natively as POSIX/GNU calls.
Fix maintainer processing
Alexander N. Sørnes
From 12259f982104f35282fc8b2fa2152ceed2310d1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?utf-8?q?Alexander=20Nicolaysen=20S=C3=B8rnes?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:25:38 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix maintainer processing
---
include/maintainer
On Saturday 20 October 2007 19:40:48 Tony Lambregts wrote:
> Dan Kegel wrote:
> > On 10/19/07, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any reason why you're not using the AppDB? This is exactly what it is
> for,
> >>>
> >>> Finally, I've been asking for appdb maintainer
On 21/10/2007, Scott Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Speaking of which, why do we still not have a GUI option for them in
> winecfg?
>
> And, more to the point, are they nearly stable enough to be default yet?
>
They should probably be default these days.
24 matches
Mail list logo
