Is there anything wrong with this patch ? I think this one is a real memory
leak.
"WaitNamedPipeW" in dlls/kernel32/sync.c gets flagged by Michael Stefaniuc's
unfree-wine.pl script
for leaking "pipe_wait".
pipe_wait isn't used anywhere between its allocation and the memory leak in the
error
On 10/11/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, because not all printing problems are gdi, and if you don't have
> gdi-printing, there's no need for gdi-video; just plain gdi works.
> The same argument goes for gdi-video. So, we should have:
>
> gdi
> printing
>
> and any bugs that are
On 10/11/07, Jesse Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/11/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/11/07, Detlef Riekenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mi, 2007-10-10 at 15:20 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
> > >
> > > > wine-gdi-(printing) -> gdi
> > >
> > > This is a bad I
On 10/11/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/11/07, Detlef Riekenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mi, 2007-10-10 at 15:20 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
> >
> > > wine-gdi-(printing) -> gdi
> >
> > This is a bad Idea.
> > We have a lot of different dlls related to printing:
> >
It would be great to have a booth there, hope somebody can go.
It's kind of hard to do a good booth on short notice, though.
Let's remember that this is coming up next year, and plan
for it. Can you send me contact info for the organizers?
Thanks,
Dan
"Juan Lang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The last version was missing the inf file.
You can't use source tree files in tests, that won't work when running
on Windows. The test itself should create the external files it needs.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/11/07, Detlef Riekenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mi, 2007-10-10 at 15:20 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
>
> > wine-gdi-(printing) -> gdi
>
> This is a bad Idea.
> We have a lot of different dlls related to printing:
>
> comdlg32.dll
> compstui.dll
> gdi32.dll
> localspl.dll
> printui.dll
On Mi, 2007-10-10 at 15:20 -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
> wine-gdi-(printing) -> gdi
This is a bad Idea.
We have a lot of different dlls related to printing:
comdlg32.dll
compstui.dll
gdi32.dll
localspl.dll
printui.dll
shell32.dll
wineps.drv
winspool.drv
I vote for "printing" next to "gdi"
--
> Ok, I'll get working on this soon. I have midterms this week, and
> then I'll start looking at it. Would you guys prefer if I tried to
> cover all the major news since the last WWN (thus less specific detail
> on each) or just the recent stuff in more detail?
Personally, I think a writeup of
Juan Lang wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
>> I've been mulling this over for awhile and I'm potentially willing to
>> write the WWN. I've been reading all of patches, devel, and bugs for
>> about a year now, so I keep pretty up to date with what's going on. I'm
>> a Senior at UIUC and my major is History,
>
> I've been kind of quiet on the whole topic and not really advertised
> for someone else to take it over. I think a big part of that is I
> thought my schedule would eventually slow down and I could pick it
> back up again. Well, it's been a year and I don't see that happening
> any time soon.
Dimi Paun wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We've got a lot of vandals lately on the wiki, and people
> are doing quite a bit of cleanup for no good reason. So
> I have removed the ability of people that are not logged
> in to edit pages. In fact this has been in force for a
> long time, but since we've upgraded
On 10/11/07, Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We've got a lot of vandals lately on the wiki, and people
> are doing quite a bit of cleanup for no good reason. So
> I have removed the ability of people that are not logged
> in to edit pages. In fact this has been in force for a
> lo
Folks,
We've got a lot of vandals lately on the wiki, and people
are doing quite a bit of cleanup for no good reason. So
I have removed the ability of people that are not logged
in to edit pages. In fact this has been in force for a
long time, but since we've upgraded to the new 1.5.x release
of
On 10/10/07, Alex Waite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been mulling this over for awhile and I'm potentially willing to
> write the WWN. I've been reading all of patches, devel, and bugs for
> about a year now, so I keep pretty up to date with what's going on. I'm
> a Senior at UIUC and my m
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 11:44:03AM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Thursday 11 October 2007 04:02:22 Jan Zerebecki wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 06:22:19PM -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
> >> That way, there isn't a conflict between audio
> >> streams to send to audio output.
> > Any mixing re
On Thursday 11 October 2007 04:02:22 Jan Zerebecki wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 06:22:19PM -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
>> That way, there isn't a conflict between audio
>> streams to send to audio output.
> Any mixing resolves this conflict, the only thing that does not
> support this is bare o
On Thursday 11 October 2007 08:45:40 Marcus Meissner wrote:
> Hmm, windows has more processes running of course.
>
> Can you revert the above and use this simpler check?
> (and try running it some times to see randomness, if any.)
This version succeeds repeatedly, while starting several new
proce
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, King InuYasha wrote:
> Compiz has made a workaround available in git for this issue.
>
> http://gitweb.opencompositing.org/?p=fusion/plugins/workarounds;a=commit;h=ddea8b07cf3046e2bb72dd5bc5161a6d24ef9f16
Nice, thanks. Are you aware of any discussion thread on a mailing l
19 matches
Mail list logo
