On Monday October 8 2007 23:01, TheBlunderbuss wrote:
>> L. Rahyen wrote:
>> I didn't tested yet my one-core system with new 2.6.23 kernel so
>> I'm not sure how well it will behave with uniprocessor system but I guess
>> it should work as expected.
> Please test with your uniprocessor an
Wine must not let go of the OSS support since OSS was recently made GPL'd
and CDDL'd for use in FOSS kernels by its maker (4Front) and OSS is the
POSIX audio system of choice for nearly every time except Linux. Linux does
not use OSS anymore and uses ALSA. Since Linux is the primary target of
Wine,
L. Rahyen wrote:
You probably should try new linux kernel. There is
high chances that it will
fix these problems for you. Personally I use 2.6.23-rc8. You find that with
new kernel performance is very good even under heavy load
...But when I have purchased 3 GHz quad-core system with
On 10/8/07, King InuYasha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Wine must not let go of the OSS support since OSS was recently made GPL'd
> and CDDL'd for use in FOSS kernels by its maker (4Front) and OSS is the
> POSIX audio system of choice for nearly every time except Linux. Linux does
> not use OSS an
The current article for Wine is here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine_%28software%29
It needs a lot of work. There's a large (and growing) todo list on the
talk page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wine_%28software%29
Some of the information needed (eg, statistics for Wine usage) are
likely
Hi,
I have a game (Last Chaos USA by AeriaGames) which does not start up
the main game due to a bug in its toolhelp snaphot handling.
It does:
h = CreateToolhelp32Snapshot();
Process32First(h, &x);
while (Process32Next(h,&x)) {
/* check x */
}
So i
Kai Blin wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm currently looking into getting an up-to-date list of maintainers for
> certain subsystems. I would like to keep that in the context of the dll
> status
> pages, but in order to keep them maintainable, I'm considering to move those
> pages to the wiki.
>
> A
On Monday 08 October 2007 14:43:30 Dave Phillips wrote:
> Well, first I'd suggest simply supporting ALSA as thoroughly as
> necessary or possible. It is the default kernel sound system, Wine
> may as well incorporate it as well as it can. Supporting the
> deprecated OSS API might be a good idea to
Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>Damjan Jovanovic schreef:
>
>
>>Pulseaudio isn't "yet another sound server", it's a full-blown
>>replacement for all other sound servers. It mixes sound better than
>>alsa's dmix, it's a drop-in replacement for ESD, and it works even for
>>OSS applications using oss2pul
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 23:07 +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> Hello!
>
> King InuYasha wrote:
> > I would like to suggest that eventually Wine would support PulseAudio as
> > a sound output natively. I am already aware of Wine supporting ESD,
> > which PulseAudio can use, but supporting PulseAudi
On Monday October 8 2007 10:48, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Damjan Jovanovic schreef:
> > Pulseaudio isn't "yet another sound server", it's a full-blown
> > replacement for all other sound servers. It mixes sound better than
> > alsa's dmix, it's a drop-in replacement for ESD, and it works even for
Damjan Jovanovic schreef:
> Pulseaudio isn't "yet another sound server", it's a full-blown
> replacement for all other sound servers. It mixes sound better than
> alsa's dmix, it's a drop-in replacement for ESD, and it works even for
> OSS applications using oss2pulse. Some of its interesting featu
I think that's a great idea but would it be cheeky
of me to suggest that at the same time, the general
state of the to-do information be updated as well?
Just as a somewhat newbie diving in, there's a lot
of stuff spread out over various places in both
www.winehq.org / wiki.winehq.org that describ
On Sunday 07 October 2007 13:41:10 Marcus Meissner wrote:
> Feel free to upload more slides, and if you are lazy, send them to
> me and I will ;)
Done.
Cheers,
Kai
--
Kai Blin
WorldForge developer http://www.worldforge.org/
Wine developerhttp://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin
Samba team member
On Sunday 07 October 2007 23:07:02 Dan Kegel wrote:
> Should we modify our Bugzilla to hide email addresses at least a little?
> I'd like that myself, and users request it occasionally.
> Just now, somebody asked that he be removed from
> bugzilla because it doesn't do this.
> - Dan
Bugzilla does
Hi folks,
I'm currently looking into getting an up-to-date list of maintainers for
certain subsystems. I would like to keep that in the context of the dll status
pages, but in order to keep them maintainable, I'm considering to move those
pages to the wiki.
Any thoughts about that?
Cheers,
Ka
16 matches
Mail list logo
