On 10/3/07, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 October 2007 22:48:21 EA Durbin wrote:
> > Looks like Microsoft is making their source code available for the .NET
> > libraries. under their reference license.
> >
> > http://www.whurley.com/blog/2007/10/opennet-microso.html
>
> IIR
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 22:48:21 EA Durbin wrote:
> Looks like Microsoft is making their source code available for the .NET
> libraries. under their reference license.
>
> http://www.whurley.com/blog/2007/10/opennet-microso.html
IIRC the MS reference license is pretty useless for (L)GPL devel
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 12:09:36PM -0700, Roy Shea wrote:
> (1) Shall I add bits to wine in dlls/bits or dlls/qmgr? I recommend
> the former, since current Windows documentation refers to "bits". But
> this may confuse folks who don't understand the tie between qmgr and
> bits, as demonstrated by
Looks like Microsoft is making their source code available for the .NET
libraries. under their reference license.
http://www.whurley.com/blog/2007/10/opennet-microso.html
_
Climb to the top of the charts! Play Star Shuffle: the wo
Howdy All,
Thanks for helping me these past weeks as I get started with Wine
development! I'm gaining a better understanding of the bits
(Background Intelligent Transfer Service) COM service. Bits is run as
a service via the svchost group netsvcs. Within netsvcs is the BITS
service that is tied
Juan Lang wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> +file->mode |= st.st_mode & (S_IRWXU|S_IRWXO);
>
> Why "|=" rather than simply "="?
>
Good point. I had a reason when I was wrote the code, but it seems like
there should be no problems with file->mode always being kept up-to-date.
--
Rob Shearman
On 10/3/07, Peter Beutner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Juan Lang schrieb:
> > 2. Mr. Focht's contributions are valuable for understanding what MS is
> > up to from time to time, but he does use a disassembler, and that's
> > not allowed from Wine contributors.
> >
>
> That's funny, where wine even
Hi Rob,
+file->mode |= st.st_mode & (S_IRWXU|S_IRWXO);
Why "|=" rather than simply "="?
--Juan
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 06:59:15 am Florian Köberle wrote:
> Hi
>
> I tried the Window with Button Demo from:
> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=5777
>
> The main window still overdraw the button.
>
> Used wine version:
> 57a67ebcceb08639736f218f0f545aa41737ad96
>
> graphic card:
> GeF
On Wednesday October 3 2007 11:44, Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to Chris his recent child window work, there is now support for
> OpenGL child windows in Wine. For the exact details read bug 2398 or Chris
> his patches. In short the patches use XComposite were possible and else X
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi
>
> I tried the Window with Button Demo from:
> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=5777
>
> The main window still overdraw the button.
>
> Used wine version:
> 57a67ebcceb08639736f218f0f545aa41737ad96
>
> graphic card:
> GeForce 78
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I tried the Window with Button Demo from:
http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=5777
The main window still overdraw the button.
Used wine version:
57a67ebcceb08639736f218f0f545aa41737ad96
graphic card:
GeForce 7800 GTX
driver:
NVIDIA UNIX x8
Juan Lang schrieb:
> 2. Mr. Focht's contributions are valuable for understanding what MS is
> up to from time to time, but he does use a disassembler, and that's
> not allowed from Wine contributors.
>
That's funny, where wine even includes its own disassembler. Or is
winedbg going to be removed
Hi,
Thanks to Chris his recent child window work, there is now support for OpenGL
child windows in Wine. For the exact details read bug 2398 or Chris his
patches. In short the patches use XComposite were possible and else X pixmaps.
Not all drivers support both properly yet but for compiz/aiglx
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 12:24:52 Robert Shearman wrote:
> Kai Blin wrote:
> > Would it make sense to try and get winbind to do that for us, if
> > possible? Or would we be unable to use the results of that in a sensible
> > way?
> >
> > Jerry Carter is currently working on an LGPL winbind clie
Kai Blin wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 October 2007 11:18:48 Robert Shearman wrote:
>
>> Alexandre Julliard wrote:
>>
>>> Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
+/* assume we are the owner */
+if (st.st_mode & S_IRWXU)
+{
>>> Why are you a
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> We don't have a mapping between NT SIDs and Unix user IDs in Wine, so
>> if the owner is different then there isn't much we can do with it.
>>
>
> You can't report the correct user SID, but you can still report m
Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Coverity also spotted this one, and I agree.
I don't, the DC is always valid since we are inside a driver call.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looking at this code it becomes clear we perform out of range array
> accesses in those cases we execute the full loops.
This can't happen. If there's no ret instruction in the entry point
we'll have much bigger problems than an out of range access...
Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We don't have a mapping between NT SIDs and Unix user IDs in Wine, so
> if the owner is different then there isn't much we can do with it.
You can't report the correct user SID, but you can still report more
correct permissions for the current user by
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 11:18:48 Robert Shearman wrote:
> Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> +/* assume we are the owner */
> >> +if (st.st_mode & S_IRWXU)
> >> +{
> >
> > Why are you assuming that? There doesn't seem to be much sense in
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> +/* assume we are the owner */
>> +if (st.st_mode & S_IRWXU)
>> +{
>>
>
> Why are you assuming that? There doesn't seem to be much sense in
> checking permissions without checking the owner.
>
We d
Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +/* assume we are the owner */
> +if (st.st_mode & S_IRWXU)
> +{
Why are you assuming that? There doesn't seem to be much sense in
checking permissions without checking the owner.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Mikolaj Zalewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ddhelp.exe is on the list of fake dlls even if I couldn't find any
> reference to building such a file in Wine sources. The created fake
> DLL couldn't be loaded with LoadLibrary (however what's interesting it
> could be loaded with LoadLibraryEx(..
On 02/10/2007, Brian Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hehe.. now this year I'm on the other side of the fence.
>
> I would be thrilled if someone could have video available as a file
> download. I don't care so much about a stream and a stream not
> archived would be even more useless (unless
25 matches
Mail list logo
