On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 11:15:26PM +0100, Robert Shearman wrote:
> >Sorry, I missed your last three patches somehow. My patch not only uses
> >RPC_FC_POINTER instead of RPC_FC_LONG here, but it also implements the
> >pointer description section for complex structures.
>
> Right, but I was really
Dan Hipschman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 09:23:37AM +0100, Robert Shearman wrote:
>
>> Dan Hipschman wrote:
>>
>>> var_t *field,
>>> }
>>> else if (is_ptr(type))
>>> {
>>> -print_file(file, 2, "0x8,\t/* FC_LONG */\n");
>>> +unsigned char fc = (cont->type ==
Mikolaj Zalewski wrote:
> I don't want this patch to get committed but to maybe get some
> comments. If the patch will be considered to be ok I can send it as
> three smaller patches. It implements the basic infrastructure for
> services.exe - a process that maintains the services database and
> st
Stefan Ensslen wrote:
> I wanted to contact Mike McCormack from the WinE developer team, but my email
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounced. If you could send me his new email address, I'd
> be very happy.
>
> The question I wanted to ask Mr. McCormack is the following:
> Dear Mike,
>
> I have found yo
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 09:23:37AM +0100, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Dan Hipschman wrote:
> >var_t *field,
> > }
> > else if (is_ptr(type))
> > {
> >-print_file(file, 2, "0x8,\t/* FC_LONG */\n");
> >+unsigned char fc = (cont->type == RPC_FC_BOGUS_STRUCT
> >+
Dear Sirs,
I wanted to contact Mike McCormack from the WinE developer team, but my email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounced. If you could send me his new email address, I'd
be very happy.
The question I wanted to ask Mr. McCormack is the following:
Dear Mike,
I have found your code for generating
This has happened in the past a handful of times. I suspect that our
own code is taking the server down via retries. I'm thinking we should
detect a too many connections error and cause the client to wait for a
period of time before retrying. I'm not sure how best to do this or if
this really is th
On 9/17/07, John Klehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds like you need to patch your mingw w32api (not surprising as the
> way it comes is way out of sync with wine).
>
> These pages should help you:
> [1] http://www.winehq.org/site/docs/winedev-guide/cross-compiling-tests
> [2] http://www.winehq
Hello,
I am unable to access the database now because of too many MySQL connections.
Does anyone have a log file to indicate whether this is some sort of attack,
or whether we just have too many legitimate users?
Alexander N. Sørnes
"Juan Lang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As I wrote in my other email, I obviously need to update the PSDK I have
>> installed in Wine to get the header file. I'll look into that a bit later. I
>> assume that TCP_ATMARK could be similar to SO_OOBINLINE, but that's a wild
>> guess. I will need to
> I don't think so. SIOCATMARK is an WSAIoctl/ioctlsocket option in the winsock
> api, too. We don't seem to handle that in WSAIoctl, it seems, patch coming
> up.
Fair enough, I didn't investigate it further than with grep.
> As I wrote in my other email, I obviously need to update the PSDK I hav
Andrey Gavrilin wrote:
> I wish to compile wine from sources. Has received such message. The
> distribution: Ubuntu 7.04. What headers files does not suffice? PS I
> used the program the translator from Russian to English.
See http://wiki.winehq.org/Recommended_Packages
--
Rob Shearman
Dan Hipschman wrote:
> var_t *field,
> }
> else if (is_ptr(type))
> {
> -print_file(file, 2, "0x8,\t/* FC_LONG */\n");
> +unsigned char fc = (cont->type == RPC_FC_BOGUS_STRUCT
> +? RPC_FC_POINTER
> +: RPC_FC_LONG
James Hawkins wrote:
> + if (IsBadReadPtr(pintern, 1))
> + {
> + SetLastError(ERROR_INVALID_HANDLE);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
>if(pintern->Magic==MAGIC_GLOBAL_USED)
>{
> if (!pintern->Pointer) /* handle case of GlobalAlloc( ??,0) */
It would
On Monday 17 September 2007 22:44:05 Juan Lang wrote:
> > The TCP Option 0x0008 is defined as TCP_ATMARK in ws2_ipdef.h in
> > the Windows SDK. Does anyone know how this should be mapped ?
>
> Is this SIOCATMARK?
I don't think so. SIOCATMARK is an WSAIoctl/ioctlsocket option in the winsock
ap
15 matches
Mail list logo
