Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Anyone?
This is getting pretty serious now as several test reports that are
submitted will never be processed. I could of course try and fix this
in the parser but I do want to know what the issue is. The strange
thing is that i
I'm not going to continue this. This is my last message concerning this
argument.
I just have a few things to point out.
Yes, there should be specific rules for IRC. Obviously, when there aren't,
things like this happen. I'm still banned from the channel, people in this
mailing list have said he s
I think there is a problem with the check_sharing function in server/fd.c.
At the end of the function when it is checking existing_access with
the sharing variable it doesn't seem to care about what the caller is
requesting.
I think this is what is causing problems with the CreateFile call,
becau
Hi Juan,
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 20:02:17 Juan Lang wrote:
[snip!]
> Yes, that's true, but if trust truly is the issue, we have to ask what
> exactly is being protected. [nothing's using Wine's CA root certs]
Sure, if nothing is using Wine's root store just now it's probably overkill.
I'm
I think it is safe to avoid working on parts of wine that are directly
involved with the source code you have seen.
You are probably talking about the windows 2000 winsock source code
that was leaked a while ago, right? If so I believe it would be safe
for you to contribute to other parts of wine
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> Anyone?
>>
>> This is getting pretty serious now as several test reports that are
>> submitted will never be processed. I could of course try and fix this
>> in the parser but I do want to know what the issue is. The stra
I think the poster was 'Pie-rate' in the chat logs.
Pie-rate - you over-reacted to 'oh well' and you're next message was
flame bait. Vitamin - you took the bait. I wouldn't have expected
that from an admin in a help channel. Take a break if you feel the
need to shout/swear at people. Or te
On Thursday 16 August 2007 21:52:01 Louis. Lenders wrote:
> Hi, this fixes a crash in TrueImage installer (bug
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3572)
Personally I'd prefer if the LSA functions could go into a seperate source
file.
Cheers,
Kai
--
Kai Blin
WorldForge developer http://ww
On Thursday 16 August 2007 20:27:04 Jonathan Challinger wrote:
Jonathan,
without wanting to give the impression that you posted on this list and now
everybody is ganging up on you, I do have a couple of comments here.
> Jan Zerebecki, I'd be happy to help, but how? I could develop some
> guidel
> That's like inviting people to an installfest,
> and then when they ask for help installing something saying "OH WELL"
> and spitting in their faces."
I think I can explain my thinking plainer:
One person tells another,
"I need a dollar to buy a candy bar",
You don't have a dollar, or not inter
Hello,
I'm a (mostly windows, but with some linux skills) programmer from russia
who is interested in helping developing Wine, but due to all the mess I read
about the legal issues I want to ask first.
What is Wine's position regarding people who had seen the windows source
code? I tried to search
On 8/15/07, Jonathan Challinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Below is a log of #winehq, from 9:44 to 10:09 on Wednesday August 15th:
> (09:43:50 PM) Pie-rate: my brother's girlfriend's WoW install is
> crashing (locking up, stops responding) randomly. she will install
> windows tomorrow if it doesn
Jan Zerebecki, I'd be happy to help, but how? I could develop some
guidelines and rules for admins to follow, but then what? How would they be
enforced? I have no authority to put such things in place. Its not the
writing rules that's hard, its the enforcing them. Here: i'll write them
now:
Either
Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyone?
>
> This is getting pretty serious now as several test reports that are
> submitted will never be processed. I could of course try and fix this
> in the parser but I do want to know what the issue is. The strange
> thing is that it only happens in
Kirill K. Smirnov wrote:
file: 2 tests executed (0 marked as todo, 0 failures), 0 skipped.
file: 373 tests executed (0 marked as todo, 0 failures), 0 skipped.
These lines are displayed via printf (include/wine/test.h: 391).
msvcrt:file done (0)
And this via xprintf (programs/winetest/main.c
Maarten Lankhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tried MS Platform SDK for win2003, but it doesn't have it, the missing
> IDS only exist in the DDK, and are not part of dxguid. The IID's are:
If the ids are not in the PSDK libdxguid then they shouldn't be in the
Wine one.
--
Alexandre Julliard
> (09:44:15 PM) vitamin: carretto, you have to install the game
> on Wine
> (09:44:34 PM) vitamin: Pie-rate, oh well
I think that vitamin provided a valid answer to your question that
would have solved your problem. Why are you getting so worked up that
he was a little rude? He is not our employ
On Thursday 16 August 2007 16:06:31 Kuba Ober wrote:
> > > Why? This is a non-issue. Make it a configure parameter, document in
> > > the changelog/release notes, and the packagers will take care of it.
> >
> > It's very much an issue if you want to build a binary that works on
> > multiple distro
[16T07:04:50] any admins of #winehq in here other than
vitamin? i'd like to report abuse of admin privileges. here is
the conversation, judge it however you like:
http://pastebin.ca/659216
[16T07:09:29] Pie-rate, we currently have no rules in
place for channel admins or for communication in gener
On Thursday 16 August 2007, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On 8/16/07, Kuba Ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 15 August 2007, Juan Lang wrote:
> > > Could some of you check where you have, say, OpenSSL's CA certificates
> > > installed, and email me what distro you're running, and the pat
On Thursday 16 August 2007, you wrote:
> Kuba Ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wednesday 15 August 2007, Juan Lang wrote:
> >> Could some of you check where you have, say, OpenSSL's CA certificates
> >> installed, and email me what distro you're running, and the path?
> >
> > Why? This is a
Kuba Ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 15 August 2007, Juan Lang wrote:
>> Could some of you check where you have, say, OpenSSL's CA certificates
>> installed, and email me what distro you're running, and the path?
>
> Why? This is a non-issue. Make it a configure parameter, document
On 8/16/07, Kuba Ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 August 2007, Juan Lang wrote:
> > Could some of you check where you have, say, OpenSSL's CA certificates
> > installed, and email me what distro you're running, and the path?
>
> Why? This is a non-issue. Make it a configure paramet
On Wednesday 15 August 2007, Juan Lang wrote:
> Could some of you check where you have, say, OpenSSL's CA certificates
> installed, and email me what distro you're running, and the path?
Why? This is a non-issue. Make it a configure parameter, document in the
changelog/release notes, and the pack
Louis. Lenders wrote:
fix bug http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794
-
Yahoo! Answers - Get better answers from someone who knows. Tryit now.
Aren't the curly brackets stra
Mikolaj Zalewski wrote:
> I now start to understand the structure of the tests. Do you know if
> there is a known regression in current Wine that I could use to try to
> do some scripting? If not I could use wine-0.9.43 as a reference with
> it's Win16 regression that affects the pptviewer and exc
Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I gladly take the side of vitamin on this issue. I believe he is a
> valuable member of the FOSS community, he has contributed many patches
> to this and other OSS projects. And in HIS free time he volunteers on
> the #winehq IRC channel to help people who
On 8/16/07, Jonathan Challinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Vitamin is a disgrace to the OSS community. It is "RTFM and google it"
> elitists like him who scare people away from switching to open source
> applications. The fact that he was made an admin is inexcusable.
>
I gladly take the side
Roderick Colenbrander schreef:
> On Thursday 16 August 2007 12:06, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>
>> Makes it cross-compilable to produce a windows binary.
>>
> I don't think this is the right way. It appears that native dxguid doesn't
> define some of the uuids needed for directdraw / directs
On Thursday 16 August 2007 12:06, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Makes it cross-compilable to produce a windows binary.
I don't think this is the right way. It appears that native dxguid doesn't
define some of the uuids needed for directdraw / directsound. You need to
check where the missing guids a
Zhongli Xu gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi all,I run some tests about mixed using WritePrivateProfileString and stand
file operationsCodes look like this:GetPrivateProfileString(keyname,
value);fopen();fprintf("# comments");
> fclose();WritePrivateProfileString(keyname, newvalue);What I found in the f
Hi all,
I run some tests about mixed using WritePrivateProfileString and stand file
operations
Codes look like this:
GetPrivateProfileString(keyname, value);
fopen();
fprintf("# comments");
fclose();
WritePrivateProfileString(keyname, newvalue);
What I found in the file is that either WritePriv
32 matches
Mail list logo
