On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 01:26 +0200, Peter Dons Tychsen wrote:
> I will go back and redo the tests with this approach, now that you have
> torpedoed my idea, which i probably deserved.
OK. To recover from my earlier brain-dead idea, i think i have came up
with a much simpler solution, based on your
On Sunday 05 August 2007 02:23:11 pm Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Chris Robinson wrote:
> > +
> > +/* End */
> > +{NULL, 0}
> > };
>
> [..]
>
> > -for (i = 0; i < (sizeof(EXTENSION_MAP) /
> > sizeof(*EXTENSION_MAP)); ++i) { +for (i = 0;
> > EXTENSION_MAP[i].extension_s
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 21:13 +0200, Peter Dons Tychsen wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 21:12 +0200, Peter Dons Tychsen wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 12:04 +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> > > "Peter Dons Tychsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > 1) Yes i did testing on Windows-XP. I did i
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 23:23 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Peter Dons Tychsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This piece of code, if inserted into the test system, could (on original
> > Windows) show us which messages we are incorrectly posting or sending. I
> > can probably also be used fo
This type of construct seems popular in the wine source:
while (isspace(*GL_Extensions)) GL_Extensions++;
Start = GL_Extensions;
Or even worse (I've seen this in winex11.drv, and it took me quite a
long time until I understood it - it was part of a larger block with a
lot these constructs):
Am Freitag, 3. August 2007 18:18 schrieb H. Verbeet:
> On 03/08/07, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +ok(SUCCEEDED(hr) || hr == D3DERR_INVALIDCALL,
> > "IDirect3DDevice9_CreateTexture: %s\n", DXGetErrorString9(hr));
>
> Same comment as for yesterday's test (even though that on
Kai Blin wrote:
>
> Why would you even bother to disassemble to write a unit test? All Wine cares
> about is "What's the output of function X when I put in Y and Z as
> parameters?". That's why you write a conformance test that will run on
> Windows. Then you make Wine behave the same. No need t
Kai Blin wrote:
> On Sunday 05 August 2007 04:23:15 Peter Dons Tychsen wrote:
>
>
>> It was regarding the fact that it is not allowed to disassemble and
>> reverse engineer Microsoft DLLs. I understand this part, as their
>> license prohibits it (EULA).
>>
>
> Please note that "reverse engi
Peter Dons Tychsen wrote:
> By browsing MSDN, i found out that i can accomplish this by using the
> documented function StalkWalk64(), which can examine the call stack. I
> would then introduce this into the test system for DLLs like "user32".
> By running the test on original Windows we could know
Chris Robinson wrote:
+
+/* End */
+{NULL, 0}
};
[..]
-for (i = 0; i < (sizeof(EXTENSION_MAP) / sizeof(*EXTENSION_MAP));
++i) {
+for (i = 0; EXTENSION_MAP[i].extension_string; ++i) {
What was the reason for this change? It's a static const array why do you
Peter Dons Tychsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This piece of code, if inserted into the test system, could (on original
> Windows) show us which messages we are incorrectly posting or sending. I
> can probably also be used for other test purposes. I works by checking
> the call stack for the cal
Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
(I've just remembered that there is a limit on the email size, so I'm
doing it a
bit differently now. The other email, including the screenshots, will
probably come through as well)
Before sending this to wine-patches I would like people to have a look
first.
This p
Hi,
(I've just remembered that there is a limit on the email size, so I'm doing it a
bit differently now. The other email, including the screenshots, will probably
come through as well)
Before sending this to wine-patches I would like people to have a look first.
This patch makes sure that mi
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 21:12 +0200, Peter Dons Tychsen wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 12:04 +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> > "Peter Dons Tychsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > 1) Yes i did testing on Windows-XP. I did it by putting together various
> > > examples and by checking with InSen
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 12:04 +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Peter Dons Tychsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 1) Yes i did testing on Windows-XP. I did it by putting together various
> > examples and by checking with InSendMessage() for all cases. This
> > clearly showed that WM_ACTIVATEAPP w
Peter Dons Tychsen wrote:
OK, fair enough. Even though i did'nt like messing around with
joystick_linuxinput.c i should have been smarter than trying to submit
something i could not test... :-(
But... tada!... now i have re-fixed it and re-tested both
implementations. Its seems stable now. :-)
On Sunday 05 August 2007 18:06:28 Jakob Eriksson wrote:
> Kai Blin wrote:
> > On Sunday 05 August 2007 04:23:15 Peter Dons Tychsen wrote:
> >> It was regarding the fact that it is not allowed to disassemble and
> >> reverse engineer Microsoft DLLs. I understand this part, as their
> >> license proh
On Sunday 05 August 2007 17:27:23 you wrote:
> Thanks for your comments Kai.
My pleasure.
> > It's also not allowed to break other laws while developing software.
> > Where would you draw the line? Disassembling software is (almost always)
> > illegal. Killing people is illegal. Should both be i
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 17:27 +0200, Peter Dons Tychsen wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 09:58 +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
> > On Sunday 05 August 2007 04:23:15 Peter Dons Tychsen wrote:
> >
> > > It was regarding the fact that it is not allowed to disassemble and
> > > reverse engineer Microsoft DLLs. I u
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 09:58 +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
> On Sunday 05 August 2007 04:23:15 Peter Dons Tychsen wrote:
>
> > It was regarding the fact that it is not allowed to disassemble and
> > reverse engineer Microsoft DLLs. I understand this part, as their
> > license prohibits it (EULA).
>
> Ple
On Sunday 05 August 2007 04:23:15 Peter Dons Tychsen wrote:
> It was regarding the fact that it is not allowed to disassemble and
> reverse engineer Microsoft DLLs. I understand this part, as their
> license prohibits it (EULA).
Please note that "reverse engineering by disassembly" is not the sam
21 matches
Mail list logo
