On 8/3/07, Evan Stade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/3/07, Nigel Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > diff --git a/programs/winecfg/winecfg.c b/programs/winecfg/winecfg.c
> > index 84dd4c8..05f322c 100644
> > --- a/programs/winecfg/winecfg.c
> > +++ b/programs/winecfg/winecfg.c
> > @@ -468,11 +4
On 8/3/07, Nigel Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> diff --git a/programs/winecfg/winecfg.c b/programs/winecfg/winecfg.c
> index 84dd4c8..05f322c 100644
> --- a/programs/winecfg/winecfg.c
> +++ b/programs/winecfg/winecfg.c
> @@ -468,11 +468,15 @@ void set_reg_key(HKEY root, const char *
>
> wp
"Peter Dons Tychsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1) Yes i did testing on Windows-XP. I did it by putting together various
examples and by checking with InSendMessage() for all cases. This
clearly showed that WM_ACTIVATEAPP was always posted and never sent.
Looks like you misunderstood the InSen
On 8/3/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/3/07, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Module: wine
> > Branch: master
> > Commit: 2d5a89bab087d09f3e3876e29ae32a2e863273fe
> > URL:
> > http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit;h=2d5a89bab087d09f3e3876e29ae32a2e
Hello again,
1) Yes i did testing on Windows-XP. I did it by putting together various
examples and by checking with InSendMessage() for all cases. This
clearly showed that WM_ACTIVATEAPP was always posted and never sent.
2) Yes, i tested with the msg.c test-cases. The patch does "break" some
test
Evan Stade wrote:
diff --git a/dlls/gdi32/enhmetafile.c b/dlls/gdi32/enhmetafile.c
index 9e7684b..2b4d03f 100644
--- a/dlls/gdi32/enhmetafile.c
+++ b/dlls/gdi32/enhmetafile.c
@@ -1172,6 +1172,7 @@ BOOL WINAPI PlayEnhMetaFileRecord(
case EMR_EXTSELECTCLIPRGN:
{
+static int e
On 8/3/07, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Module: wine
> Branch: master
> Commit: 2d5a89bab087d09f3e3876e29ae32a2e863273fe
> URL:
> http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit;h=2d5a89bab087d09f3e3876e29ae32a2e863273fe
>
> Author: Nigel Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: T
Am Freitag, 3. August 2007 18:18 schrieb H. Verbeet:
> You are now executing that code multiple times.
+ This->baseTexture.states[WINED3DTEXSTA_MIPFILTER] =
samplerStates[WINED3DSAMP_MIPFILTER];
+ This->baseTexture.states[WINED3DTEXSTA_MINFILTER] =
samplerStates[WINED3DSAMP_MINFILTER];
+ This->ba
On 03/08/07, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +ok(SUCCEEDED(hr) || hr == D3DERR_INVALIDCALL,
> "IDirect3DDevice9_CreateTexture: %s\n", DXGetErrorString9(hr));
Same comment as for yesterday's test (even though that one apparently
made it in), I don't think that's a useful test.
You are now executing that code multiple times.
Hi Tom,
Thanks for thinking of this; I think James would appreciate it
if he wasn't listed by name, though.
Otherwise, though, it looks great.
Cheers,
Jeremy
Tom Wickline wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm CC: Jeremy White in on this patch, if possible I would like to ask
> for his approval on the patch
Hi,
Forgot to include wine-devel.
Original Message
Subject: [winetest] New gather script
Hi Ferenc,
Could you have a look at the new 'gather' script? (you're the original author
after all).
The new winetest (when committed of course) executable will report when a test
is mis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Nevertheless, msvcirt.dll is not currently one of the files to be ported,
> i.e., dlls/msvcirt does not exist.
> My questions are:
> 1. Can we add the forward to all the rest of the functions in the
> msvcrt40.dll spec file to msvcirt.dll?
> 2. Should we first add a win
On Thursday 02 August 2007, Jacek Caban wrote:
> I agree that such a big code duplication is ugly, but that's the
> way to go. We may separate the common code to different files in wininet
> and keep them in sync with winhttp. This way it shouldn't be too hard to
> implement most of the functi
14 matches
Mail list logo
