Works fine for myself with
$ wine --version
wine-0.9.41-g96937e0
Bryan DeGrendel
On 7/18/07, Lei Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Works just fine here with wine-0.9.41-g96937e0.
On 7/17/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone else verify with git that winedbg no lon
Works just fine here with wine-0.9.41-g96937e0.
On 7/17/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Can someone else verify with git that winedbg no longer works?
$ winedbg winecfg
WineDbg starting on pid 000a
Wine-dbg>c
Exception c005
Wine-dbg>q
wine: Unhandled page fault on read ac
Hi,
Can someone else verify with git that winedbg no longer works?
$ winedbg winecfg
WineDbg starting on pid 000a
Wine-dbg>c
Exception c005
Wine-dbg>q
wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0x005c at address
0x7e5ac5d2 (thread 0009), starting debugger...
Can't attach process 0008:
Am Mittwoch, 18. Juli 2007 00:49 schrieb Stefan Dösinger:
There are two extensions, GL_NV_packed_depth_stencil and
> GL_EXT_packed_depth_stencil, whereas the NV one is the only one supported
> on my nvidia card and the EXT one the only one supported on my ATI card(on
> macos).
The nvidia card also
Hi Henri,
Apparently I have debugged Splinter Cell in a wrong direction. The depth copy
can hardly be the problem because splinter cell renders everything offscreen,
except the final composition and the HUD.
I think the problem is the lack of a stencil attachment to our fbos.
Implementing them
On 7/17/07, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Another test that shows that windows checks if the displayname already exists.
Changelog
Test for duplicate displayname
Cheers,
+/* To find an existing displayname we check the 'Spooler'
service. Although the registry doesn't sh
The dash array is always small, there's no reason to allocate it on
the heap, you can store an array in the pen object.
Ok
Also there
shouldn't be any need to store the 'ext' flag if you take it into
account when building the array.
You need that flag to help choosing between LineOnOffDash a
"Evan Stade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm only pretty sure this patch is correct. Specifically, note that
> there are now HeapAlloc()s in X11DRV_SelectPen that rely on
> X11DRV_SelectPen being called again to free. So what is supposed to
> happen is that X11DRV_SelectPen called with some da
"Anatoly Lyutin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have fixed failures in Win2k3 and have posed patch in Wine-Devel.
May be it will be passes in WinXP.
No, the test still doesn't pass for me under XP. I get te following
failures in your test:
msg.c:3209: Test failed: Child not switch correctly
: t
