"Jeremy White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
p.s. While I'm coming clean, *another* failure on my part
was to fail to credit Huw; this is mostly his insight.
I provided the clue, and the hopeless failure to get a clean patch in :-/.
Since you are going to resend the patch anyway please add a mis
Nigel wrote:
Is there a way you can get the path to the currently running
instance instead of hardcoding it?
Then it would work even if winefontcfg isn't on the PATH.
+GetFullPathNameW(exename, MAXSTRLEN, szFullPathName, NULL);
That just prepends the current directory onto
the given filen
The usual disclaimer, IANAL, yadda yadda.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 10:55:38PM +0200, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Hypothetial:
> Assumed ddraw.dll was signed by Microsoft. Now we have an app that checks for
> this signature, and refuses to run otherwise. This app is not part of wine,
> and it is not
On Friday 13 July 2007 18:23:32 Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> Ian Macfarlane wrote:
> > - Samba has decided to become GPL3+ only, as they want the added
> >
> > protections provided by the license. WINE and Samba seem like projects
> > that may potentially wish to share code (a very quick search bri
Am Freitag, 13. Juli 2007 17:22 schrieb Kai Blin:
> What specifically are we waiting for? Until the GPLv3 is tested in court?
> Until someone TiVolizes Wine? Christmas?
Some possible TiVolization of wine I have brought up on #winehackers with
third party signatures:
Hypothetial:
Assumed ddraw.dll
> The patch mixes tabs and spaces. Also, in general, I don't think we
> should include text from MSDN.
*blush*. Teach me to edit this on a test machine, without my .vimrc...
I'll tweak the comment, but I felt it was important to motivate
the if statement; I don't feel that it's obvious from the
Committish 7495d changed the rendering of the calendar. Just by
chance, the coordinates used in the hit test now lands on a spot that
passed the hit test.
On 7/13/07, Michael Stefaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marcus Meissner wrote:
> For some days I now get unexpected successes in
> dlls/comc
On 13/07/07, Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
---
dlls/gdi32/dib.c | 14 +++---
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
The patch mixes tabs and spaces. Also, in general, I don't think we
should include text from MSDN.
James Hawkins wrote:
On 7/13/07, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
RemoveDirectory only removes empty directories.
Changelog
Remove the whole directory after the test
No, this is wrong. The line above,
CreateDirectory("msitest\\msitest", NULL); is what needs to be
removed.
"Konstantin Kondratyuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Changelog:
add russian resources in programs/net
Did you test this translation? You are using KOI8-R which won't work
properly in russian resources.
--
Dmitry.
David Laight wrote:
> And I'm not sure that the compiler is required to treat the two
> fields of the union as being the same data item.
> Certainly if the fields of the union are 'void *' and 'intptr_t'
> you can't assume that a value written to one field of the union
> can be immediately read fr
>> Code licensed under BSD is not compatible with GPLv2. They can't include
>> GPLv2 code in codebase licensed under BSD. So there is no difference
>> between GPLv2 and GPLv3 for BSD people.
>
> BSDv2 is compatible with all versions of the GPL. Very little code is
> left floating around under the o
On 7/13/07, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
RemoveDirectory only removes empty directories.
Changelog
Remove the whole directory after the test
No, this is wrong. The line above,
CreateDirectory("msitest\\msitest", NULL); is what needs to be
removed.
--
James Hawkins
On 7/13/07, Tomas Kuliavas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Code licensed under BSD is not compatible with GPLv2. They can't include
GPLv2 code in codebase licensed under BSD. So there is no difference
between GPLv2 and GPLv3 for BSD people.
BSDv2 is compatible with all versions of the GPL. Very litt
Ian Macfarlane wrote:
> - Samba has decided to become GPL3+ only, as they want the added
protections provided by the license. WINE and Samba seem like projects
that may potentially wish to share code (a very quick search brings up
articles like this http://www.winehq.org/?issue=272), and if WINE
On 7/13/07, Ian Macfarlane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been meaning to ask about this since (L)GPL3 was released.
I'd also like to weigh in on my reasons for liking the (L)GPLv3. The
termination clause is clarified and a grace period added for
compliance. As it stands right now, if someone
>> The GPL3 has no track record so far, and it's too political and
>> controversial for my liking. Let's wait a while before making the
>> decision.
>
> Many groups are exceedingly worried about parts of GPL3.
> Not only commercial companies who may not have been obeying the
> general spirit of the
All in all the app looks like it's coming along nicely.
I apologize for catching so few problems in each pass,
but we'll get there.
Is there a way you can get the path to the currently running
instance instead of hardcoding it?
Then it would work even if winefontcfg isn't on the PATH.
+stati
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
"Anatoly Lyutin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If a message is marked as optional it can be skipped without causing
the test
to fail.
Thank you. I did not know about it. It will help me.
Here are the failures I see in
http://test.winehq.org/data/200707121000/2003_W2K3-S
Dmitry Timoshkov пишет:
"Anatoly Lyutin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You can find the results of the test run under XP here:
http://test.winehq.org/data/200707121000/xp_XP-PRO-IE7/user32:msg.txt
I get the same failures.
Thanks. I have viewed this. It was failed on "0x00ae" messages. I
could no
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
"Anatoly Lyutin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you send me output when you run my test on XP? It will be nice.
You can find the results of the test run under XP here:
http://test.winehq.org/data/200707121000/xp_XP-PRO-IE7/user32:msg.txt
I get the same failures.
Thank
I've been meaning to ask about this since (L)GPL3 was released.
The version 3 of the (L)GPL license has numerous benefits:
- It's much more legally sound in the rest of the world (IMO one of
the most important factors about the new license) - numerous reasons
for this e.g. referencing WIPO rathe
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 12:29:36PM +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Andrew Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > + const char *iter, *base_type, *catch_unsigned;
> > + union
> > + {
> > + const char*constant;
> > + char *nonconst;
> > + } type_str;
>
> That's not b
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:18:41PM +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>
> The GPL3 has no track record so far, and it's too political and
> controversial for my liking. Let's wait a while before making the
> decision.
Many groups are exceedingly worried about parts of GPL3.
Not only commercial compan
Marcus Meissner wrote:
For some days I now get unexpected successes in
dlls/comctl32/tests/monthcal.c.
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M comctl32.dll -T ../../.. -p comctl32_test.exe.so
monthcal.c && touch monthcal.ok
err:monthcal:MONTHCAL_WindowProc unknown msg 2006 wp=
lp=
Hi,
For some days I now get unexpected successes in
dlls/comctl32/tests/monthcal.c.
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M comctl32.dll -T ../../.. -p
comctl32_test.exe.so monthcal.c && touch monthcal.ok
err:monthcal:MONTHCAL_WindowProc unknown msg 2006 wp=
lp=
err:monthca
On Friday 13 July 2007 13:18:41 Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On 7/13/07, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why shouldn't Wine move?
>
> LGPL3 = GPL3 + additional permissions:
> "This version of the GNU Lesser General Public License incorporates
> the terms and conditions of version 3 of the
"Anatoly Lyutin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have asked that I can not understand why in test expected and obtained message does not coincide and test does not
fail. Ex.:
msg.c:3285:expected 0008 - actual 0008
msg.c:3285:expected 0281 - actual 0007
msg.c:3285:expected 0281 - actual 0007
msg.c:
"Anatoly Lyutin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You can find the results of the test run under XP here:
http://test.winehq.org/data/200707121000/xp_XP-PRO-IE7/user32:msg.txt
I get the same failures.
Thanks. I have viewed this. It was failed on "0x00ae" messages. I could
not find description of thi
On 7/13/07, Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also Wine isn't just a library. (LGPL)
Nor is the LGPL a license exclusively for libraries.
--tim
On Friday 13 July 2007 15:01:26 Tom Wickline wrote:
> Why shouldn't Wine move?
IMHO:
Before changing license, there must be a really good reason to do that - for
example, if application won't survive without doing so. And before change,
license must be reread at least one hundred times - just to
I think the best thing is for Wine
to support things like
LC_ALL="nn nb"
LANG="nn nb"
because even though we provide a Nynorsk translation, most programs will only
be available in Bokmål.
It seems that Vista supports many user preferred languages and many
system fallback languages so it s
On 7/13/07, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/13/07, Michael Stefaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Wickline wrote:
> > I was wondering if there are any plans in place for Wine to move to
> > the newly revised LGPL 3 licence before the release of 1.0?
> >
> > http://www.gnu.org/lic
On 7/13/07, Michael Stefaniuc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tom Wickline wrote:
> I was wondering if there are any plans in place for Wine to move to
> the newly revised LGPL 3 licence before the release of 1.0?
>
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html
Why should Wine move?
Why shouldn't Wine move
Andrew Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> + const char *iter, *base_type, *catch_unsigned;
> + union
> + {
> + const char*constant;
> + char *nonconst;
> + } type_str;
That's not better than simply casting const away, it's just hiding the
problem from the compiler.
-
Nigel Liang wrote:
Hi,
Some changes suggested by Dan.
Changelist:
- Initialize non-static local arrays at runtime or make them static
- Use CompareStringW to do case-insensitive comparison
- Initialize some static variables before use and clear them after
- Rename a global variable
- Move some
Tom Wickline wrote:
I was wondering if there are any plans in place for Wine to move to
the newly revised LGPL 3 licence before the release of 1.0?
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html
Why should Wine move?
bye
michael
--
Michael Stefaniuc Tel.: +49-711-96437-199
Sr. Net
Am Freitag, 13. Juli 2007 10:44 schrieb Robert Shearman:
> Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> > OK with me. The dual address thing is also confusing for everyone who
> > sets up his own filters in the mailer, mostly to sort out mails into
> > different folders.
>
> You should sort on the List-Id header inste
Stefan Dösinger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2007 23:39 schrieb Duane Clark:
Due to the rather large amount of spam sent to the *winehq.com email
addresses (as opposed to *winehq.org), I would like to phase them out. I
will state up front that this proposal benefits only me or any future
mo
39 matches
Mail list logo
