Re: working on urlmon HttpProtocol implementation

2007-07-08 Thread Misha Koshelev
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 00:45 +0200, Jacek Caban wrote: > Hi Misha, > > Misha Koshelev wrote: > > Just wanted to let y'all know (so hopefully I'm not duplicating any > > effort) I'm working on an HttpProtocol implementation for urlmon (Vector > > NTI has a bug that requires POST to work for url moni

bug triaging

2007-07-08 Thread James Hawkins
Hi, --- Additional Comment #3 From Austin English 2007-07-08 21:16 --- Works fine in wine 0.9.40. --- Additional Comment #4 From Lei Zhang 2007-07-08 21:32 --- Works here as well with wine 0.9.40 and a clean .wine directory. Ok folks, if you run an installer and it works f

Re: Rude hack fixes Run Time Error 445:Object Doesn't Support This Action

2007-07-08 Thread Jacek Caban
Hi David, David Anderson wrote: > What if the above simply returned S_OK with a FIXME instead > of E_NOTIMPL??? Would that be an acceptable hack for the official > source? Sure, that'd be fine in this case. Feel free to send a patch. Thanks, Jacek

Re: working on urlmon HttpProtocol implementation

2007-07-08 Thread Jacek Caban
Hi Misha, Misha Koshelev wrote: > Just wanted to let y'all know (so hopefully I'm not duplicating any > effort) I'm working on an HttpProtocol implementation for urlmon (Vector > NTI has a bug that requires POST to work for url monikers, and I don't > want to submit patches to a function that has

working on urlmon HttpProtocol implementation

2007-07-08 Thread Misha Koshelev
Just wanted to let y'all know (so hopefully I'm not duplicating any effort) I'm working on an HttpProtocol implementation for urlmon (Vector NTI has a bug that requires POST to work for url monikers, and I don't want to submit patches to a function that has _hack at the end of it :) ). Right now I

Re: #2 kernel32: Implement GetTickCount64.

2007-07-08 Thread Hans Leidekker
On Sunday 08 July 2007 14:35:46 Rolf Kalbermatter wrote: > >@@ -256,3 +256,11 @@ DWORD WINAPI GetTickCount(void) > > { > > return NtGetTickCount(); > > } > > Is there a particular reason not to call NtGetTickCount64() directly here > as is also done in NtGetTickCount(). No, but I didn't want

appdb problem: deleting test data?

2007-07-08 Thread Dan Kegel
How does one delete just one test report? There's a 'delete version' button but no 'delete test data' button, and clicking on 'edit' for the test data also doesn't offer a way to delete the test data.

RE: #2 kernel32: Implement GetTickCount64.

2007-07-08 Thread Rolf Kalbermatter
Hans Leidekker wrote: >Changelog > Implement GetTickCount64. >--- a/dlls/kernel32/kernel_main.c >+++ b/dlls/kernel32/kernel_main.c >@@ -256,3 +256,11 @@ DWORD WINAPI GetTickCount(void) > { > return NtGetTickCount(); > } Is there a particular reason not to call NtGetTickCount64() directl

Re: winealsa/dsound: Testers asked for capture patch

2007-07-08 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
As I don't have that game, can you e-mail me a WINEDEBUG=+wave,+dsound log? The problem is probably somewhere else then. There should probably be a small performance hit, but nothing to the extent that currently happens.