2007/5/23, Detlef Riekenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mi, 2007-05-23 at 02:17 +0800, Lobster DB wrote:
> may i can't mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It was automatic filtered for manual review, because
the Mail/Attachment is to large.
To get the Patches in the Tree, they must be much smaller!
oh, th
The code is definitely cleaner with all your suggestions. I'm applying
them now.
Mounir IDRASSI
IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts
http://www.idrix.fr
> James wrote:
>> This would be a lot cleaner as:
>>
>> if (!(liteSCardEstablishContext = (SCardEstablishContextPtr)
>> wine_dlsym(g_pc
Thanks for your comments Juan.
Actually, the upcoming implementation checks the used function pointer at
each call and returns an error if not assigned. Also in it, winscard
always succeed to load even if pcsc-lite is not running. FYI, my first
winscard patch contains an advanced stage of the whole
+BOOL InitializePCSCLite(void)
You don't use the return value:
@@ -42,9 +43,11 @@ BOOL WINAPI DllMain (HINSTANCE hinstDLL, DWORD
fdwReason, LPVOID lpvReserved)
{
DisableThreadLibraryCalls(hinstDLL);
WINSCARD_hModule = hinstDLL;
+InitializePCSCLite();
Ok, never mind. I found a way to fool the Windows shell into allowing me
to actually execute the appropriate console app while at the same time
picking up the DDE string in a separate server (fail connection when it
tries to connect first time in the DDE server in the process calling
ShellExecute,
James wrote:
This would be a lot cleaner as:
if (!(liteSCardEstablishContext = (SCardEstablishContextPtr)
wine_dlsym(g_pcscliteHandle,"SCardEstablishContext",szErr,sizeof(szErr)))
{
ERR("Failed to get SCardEstablishContext from pcsclite library. Error =
%s\n",szErr);
goto error;
}
I thi
On 5/23/07, Mounir IDRASSI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds helper variables and functions that exposes pcsc-lite
functionalities for the use of the upcoming implementation.
+/* loading entry points*/
+bSuccess = TRUE;
+if (bSuccess &&
+
Hi all,
So I have run into a weird problem. I was writing a conformance test for
ShellExecute logic of when to use DDE and a little about how it uses it,
as currently the logic is incorrect and fails for some apps, e.g.,
Vector NTI (the fix is pretty easy, but I'd like to make a nice
conformance t
Hi!
Welcome to wine :-)
The best way to start doing something is to pick something you want to work
that doesn't work they way you like it. Since you mentioned Counter-Strike
Source you have done that already :-) . In the course of that you will stuble
uppon more things that need work for sure
Hello all,
I just joined up to the mailing list so thought I would say hello to
everyone :-)
I am a student studying Computer Science at Manchester University (UK)
and am interested in helping the development of Wine. I decided the
first step was to hop on the mailing lists and see whats going o
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 17:37 +0200, Jan Zerebecki wrote:
>
> The following applications where mentioned in these notification emails:
> Adobe Illustrator
> Battlefield 1942
> Battlefield 2
> Battlefield 2142
> Call of Duty 2
> Call of Duty
> Checkpoint Firewall-1 Policy editor
> Command & Conquer 3
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 22:06, Paul Vriens wrote:
> Peter Oberndorfer wrote:
> > Some tests on http://test.winehq.org/data/ seem to crash silently.
> >
> Hi,
>
> Remember that not all 'Crashes' on the mentioned site are real crashes. Most
> Vista tests I'm running have 'Crash' mentioned on those
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 09:01:17AM -0500, Tom Spear wrote:
> On 5/22/07, Jan Zerebecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I would consider neither of hang, stuck, 100% cpu usage, freeze
> >to be a crash.
>
> Out of curiosity, why not?
It's probably the narrow definition from the POV of someone who
thi
Please do _only_ address replies to this email to
wine-devel@winehq.org ! Remove all other recipients from To and
Cc !
Work is currently underway to restore the state of the Appdb to
the backup of May 22 07:00 CST.
This morning ( TZ +0200 ) someone used the account "Molle
Bestefich" to vandalize
On Mi, 2007-05-23 at 02:17 +0800, Lobster DB wrote:
> may i can't mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It was automatic filtered for manual review, because
the Mail/Attachment is to large.
To get the Patches in the Tree, they must be much smaller!
> change all *Zh.rc which is Chinese simplified resource t
> Crypt32 is imported by rsaenh, so it is loaded.
>
> At first glance the problem is probably around your use of
> DuplicateHandle on a module handle, that cannot work.
Ah. Thanks, I overlooked both of those things, sorry for that.
--Juan
___
Juan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It's causing test failures:
>>
>> ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M rsaenh.dll -T ../../.. -p
>> rsaenh_test.exe.so rsaenh.c && touch rsaenh.ok
>> rsaenh.c:64: Test failed: 0, 0057
>> rsaenh.c:68: Test failed: 0057
>> make: *** [rsaenh.ok] Error
> It's causing test failures:
>
> ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M rsaenh.dll -T ../../.. -p
> rsaenh_test.exe.so rsaenh.c && touch rsaenh.ok
> rsaenh.c:64: Test failed: 0, 0057
> rsaenh.c:68: Test failed: 0057
> make: *** [rsaenh.ok] Error 2
How very odd, those failures aren't anywhe
On 5/23/07, Jeremy Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 04:36 +0200, Jan Zerebecki wrote:
> I'll ask what the progress is with our Bugzilla upgrade when
> the one who offered this comes online again.
While you are asking, make sure they are going to Bugzilla 3.0. Since that ju
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 12:49, EA Durbin wrote:
> Someone using Molle Bestefich's account has been attacking the AppDB. I've
> lost my AppDB admin privileges as well as a bunch of things are being
> deleted.
>
If anyone's able to contact Molle *other than* via gmail, it might be a good
idea to d
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 04:36 +0200, Jan Zerebecki wrote:
> I'll ask what the progress is with our Bugzilla upgrade when
> the one who offered this comes online again.
While you are asking, make sure they are going to Bugzilla 3.0. Since that just
went stable not very long ago.
I may make a sugges
On 5/22/07, Jan Zerebecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll ask what the progress is with our Bugzilla upgrade when
the one who offered this comes online again.
Thanks
I would consider neither of hang, stuck, 100% cpu usage, freeze
to be a crash.
Out of curiosity, why not?
I think that rega
Stefan Leichter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +/* Recursively delete all the subkeys */
> +for (i = 0; i < dwKeyCount; i++) {
> +dwSize = dwMaxLen;
> +ret = RegEnumKeyExW(hSubKey, 0, lpszName, &dwSize, NULL,
> + NULL, NULL, NULL);
There's no reason to u
Someone using Molle Bestefich's account has been attacking the AppDB. I've
lost my AppDB admin privileges as well as a bunch of things are being
deleted.
From: James Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Application deletion!
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 04:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
I'm
Juan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, any problems with this one?
It's causing test failures:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M rsaenh.dll -T ../../.. -p
rsaenh_test.exe.so rsaenh.c && touch rsaenh.ok
rsaenh.c:64: Test failed: 0, 0057
rsaenh.c:68: Test failed: 0057
make: *** [r
Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> @@ -810,8 +841,12 @@
> IDirectDrawSurfaceImpl_AddAttachedSurface(IDirectDrawSurfaceImpl *This,
> {
> TRACE("(%p)->(%p)\n", This, Surf);
>
> +EnterCriticalSection(&ddraw_cs);
> if(Surf == This)
> +{
> +LeaveCriticalSection(
Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> diff --git a/dlls/quartz/filtermapper.c b/dlls/quartz/filtermapper.c
> index 6adce61..841b130 100644
> --- a/dlls/quartz/filtermapper.c
> +++ b/dlls/quartz/filtermapper.c
> @@ -966,6 +966,9 @@ static HRESULT WINAPI FilterMapper2_Enum
> if (SUCCEED
"Marcus Meissner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-#define LongToHandle(h) ((HANDLE)(LONG_PTR)(h))
+#define LongToHandle(h) ((HANDLE)(LONG_PTR)(l))
I do not think this is right.
Why?
--
Dmitry.
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 05:04:39PM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> "Vijay Kiran Kamuju" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I think this patch is not correct.
> >
> >-#define LongToHandle(h) ((HANDLE)(LONG_PTR)(h))
> >+#define LongToHandle(h) ((HANDLE)(LONG_PTR)(l))
> >
> >I dont see
"Vijay Kiran Kamuju" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think this patch is not correct.
-#define LongToHandle(h) ((HANDLE)(LONG_PTR)(h))
+#define LongToHandle(h) ((HANDLE)(LONG_PTR)(l))
I dont see 'l' defined or sent to this macro any where.
If you will inspect more closely all ap
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 04:35:33PM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Changelog:
> basetsd.h: Fix a typo in the parameter name.
>
> ---
> include/basetsd.h |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/basetsd.h b/include/basetsd.h
> index e
Hi
I think this patch is not correct.
-#define LongToHandle(h) ((HANDLE)(LONG_PTR)(h))
+#define LongToHandle(h) ((HANDLE)(LONG_PTR)(l))
I dont see 'l' defined or sent to this macro any where.
Thanks,
VJ
32 matches
Mail list logo
