ANYONE WITH appdb admin rights check into IRC!!!
Jacek Caban wrote:
> Hi Vitaliy,
>
> Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
>> Jacek Caban wrote:
>>
>> wine iexplore http://winehq.org/ crashes for me.
>>
> Could you please send me seh,tid,mshtml,shdocvw logs?
Never mind. It was some testing patch in my tree that broke things.
>> BTW why JavaScript doe
I'll ask what the progress is with our Bugzilla upgrade when
the one who offered this comes online again.
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 03:25:40PM -0500, Tom Spear wrote:
> On 5/22/07, Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Searching for "Unhandled exception" is too hard?
>
> Not all bugs have a
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:13:25PM -0500, EA Durbin wrote:
> does fraps not work in wine?
http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?iVersionId=5065
Last I tested it crashed on startup:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5601 .
Jan
--- Jacek Caban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I think I found the fix. I've uploaded a new
> package. It's the
> same URL as before:
>
http://gerwazy.lo3.wroc.pl/~jcaban/wine/wine_gecko.tar.bz2
> It fixes the crash for me.
Yup this fixes that problem for me, however I've found
another regress
Hi Alexandre,
You are completely right...these variables are definitely useless!! I
don't remember when I coded that but it must have been very late at night!
Anyway, I'll purge them from the patch.
Mounir IDRASSI
IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts
http://www.idrix.fr
Alexandre Julliar
I've informed them about this. Let's hope they consider it!
Lei Zhang wrote:
Right, for instance Tom Wickline ran 3dmark2000 and posted the results
here:
http://wiki.winehq.org/BenchMark-0.9.33
On 5/21/07, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tirsdag 22 mai 2007 00:13, skre
Good point. What they probably want, is an external tool (like fraps)
that gives them some nice numbers. I have informed them of your
comments, and hope they consider it. This is the largest
computer-related site in Norway, so I hope Wine can get some good PR here..
Stefan Dösinger wrote:
Am
On 5/22/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't see how a 'crash' keyword will add any utility to bugzilla.
Is someone planning on focusing solely on apps that crash, and if so,
why?
Well, when I look thru bugzilla, that is my main focus is find bugs
with crashes, and try to debug
On 5/22/07, Tom Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/22/07, Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Searching for "Unhandled exception" is too hard?
Not all bugs have a proper trace, not all crashes result in the
unhandled exception message (100% cpu usage being one case), not all
bugs say
Hi Vitaliy,
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Jacek Caban wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It's time to update our Gecko package. I've prepared a new one. I'd like
>> to avoid any regression, esp. ones that would require changing the
>> package again. That's why I'd like to do a good test. I'm interested in
>
Jacek Caban wrote:
>> - Extracting it to install it manually works, as do
>> the scroll bars (which work fine)
>> - It crashes after submitting more than one form on
>> websites. For instance searching for something on
>> Google, then searching again will cause a crash.
>>
>>
>
> Thanks fo
Stefan Leichter a écrit :
Am Tuesday 22 May 2007 18:05 schrieb Laurent Vromman:
There is a few tabs in the file :
Here (line 92), first blank character :
+ &dwValCount, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
Here (line 103)
+ }
Laurent
Hello Laurent,
thank you for t
On 5/22/07, Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Searching for "Unhandled exception" is too hard?
Not all bugs have a proper trace, not all crashes result in the
unhandled exception message (100% cpu usage being one case), not all
bugs say crash (some say hang, or stuck, 100% cpu usage, f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The largest gaming site in Norway recently did an extensive review of gaming
> on
> Linux, but Wine was left out of the benchmark because "no FPS tool exists for
> Wine". Surely this can't be true?
>
I guess I could modify yukon [1] to not capture the actual frames but
Tom Spear wrote:
Just curious to see if anything was ever done with the offer to
upgrade bugzilla?
On a side note, it would be nice if there was a crash keyword to make
finding crashes easier
Searching for "Unhandled exception" is too hard?
--
Rob Shearman
Peter Oberndorfer wrote:
Some tests on http://test.winehq.org/data/ seem to crash silently.
Hi,
Remember that not all 'Crashes' on the mentioned site are real crashes. Most
Vista tests I'm running have 'Crash' mentioned on those pages. The reason is
that the generated results file is bigger
I sent this to the wrong list before, sorry for that..
Just curious to see if anything was ever done with the offer to
upgrade bugzilla?
On a side note, it would be nice if there was a crash keyword to make
finding crashes easier
--
Thanks
Tom
Some tests on http://test.winehq.org/data/ seem to crash silently.
This patch might be useful for debugging such crashes.
It prints out the last ok/trace that was executed before the crash,
the exception address and the type of the crash.
It also print out the summary that is normally printed at t
Mounir IDRASSI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +BOOL WINAPI DllMain (HINSTANCE hinstDLL, DWORD fdwReason, LPVOID lpvReserved)
> +{
> +TRACE("%p,%x,%p\n", hinstDLL, fdwReason, lpvReserved);
> +
> +switch (fdwReason)
> +{
> +case DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH:
> +{
> +
Am Tuesday 22 May 2007 18:05 schrieb Laurent Vromman:
> There is a few tabs in the file :
>
> Here (line 92), first blank character :
> + &dwValCount, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
>
> Here (line 103)
> + }
>
> Laurent
>
Hello Laurent,
thank you for the comment. How did you sp
There is a few tabs in the file :
Here (line 92), first blank character :
+ &dwValCount, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
Here (line 103)
+ }
Laurent
> Hello,
>
> any comment on the current version of this patch?
>
> ChangeLog
> -
> added implementation
On 5/22/07, ml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
I have a third party library which is a Windows DLL. Is it possible to
use Wine to call its functions under Linux?
I tried a simple code
#include
int main(int argc, char**argv)
{
HMODULE dll;
dll = LoadLibrary("atouch32.dll");
return 0;
}
c
On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 16:06 +0100, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Misha Koshelev wrote:
> > One more question: Will the COMification of msi somehow require OLE
> > automation, as Mike's email excerpt seems to suggest (this would be
> > another reason then to continue implementing it)? If so, how?
> >
Hi!
I have a third party library which is a Windows DLL. Is it possible to
use Wine to call its functions under Linux?
I tried a simple code
#include
int main(int argc, char**argv)
{
HMODULE dll;
dll = LoadLibrary("atouch32.dll");
return 0;
}
compiled successfully but runtime fails with
Misha Koshelev wrote:
One more question: Will the COMification of msi somehow require OLE
automation, as Mike's email excerpt seems to suggest (this would be
another reason then to continue implementing it)? If so, how?
I believe James is planning to implement it, but it doesn't really make
On 5/22/07, Misha Koshelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One more question: Will the COMification of msi somehow require OLE
automation, as Mike's email excerpt seems to suggest (this would be
another reason then to continue implementing it)? If so, how?
> It will require the OLE interfaces (Sessio
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 13:49 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> I doubt anyone knows the complete set of those functions
> that actually get used by real-world installers.
>
> I think your choice is either a) keep plugging along on msi
> automation on the theory that it's good for msi in general
> and might
On Tue, 22 May 2007, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
[...]
> But why would they prefer external stuff over the games' built-in
> benchmark features?
I believe some test sites like to build graphs of framerate over time.
This lets them extract not only the average framerate, but also the
minimum and maxi
Jacek Caban wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's time to update our Gecko package. I've prepared a new one. I'd like
> to avoid any regression, esp. ones that would require changing the
> package again. That's why I'd like to do a good test. I'm interested in
> regressions, so just a simple test if app that
Robert Shearman wrote:
Jeff Latimer wrote:
+OUR_GUID_ENTRY(IID_INetFwMgr,0xf7898af5,
0xcac4, 0x4632, 0xa2, 0xec, 0xda ,0x06, 0xe5, 0x11, 0x1a, 0xf2)
+OUR_GUID_ENTRY(CLSID_NetFwMgr, 0x304ce942,
0x6e39, 0x40d8, 0x94, 0x3a, 0xb9, 0x13, 0xc4, 0x0c, 0x9c
Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
Jeff Latimer wrote:
---
dlls/hnetcfg/hnetcfg_dll.h | 70
+
+/* __stdcall HNETCFG_HNetDeleteRasConnection(); */
It's only the comments but why don't you use WINAPI instead of __stdcall?
bye
michael
This is more a ca
Rolf Kalbermatter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +r = QueryServiceStatusEx(handle, SC_STATUS_PROCESS_INFO,
> (LPBYTE)&svcStatusData,
> + sizeof(SERVICE_STATUS_PROCESS), &sz);
> +if (r)
> +{
> +switch (dwServic
Am Dienstag 22 Mai 2007 03:32 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Looks ok
pgpEmxnWrgZUB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
34 matches
Mail list logo
