On Monday 07 May 2007 11:50 pm, Dan Kegel wrote:
> You don't have a conformance test, nor was there one for CopyFile.
> Maybe you should consider writing one, and making sure it passes
> both on Wine and Windows.
There is a test for CopyFile in kernel32/tests/file.c, if I can find some time
I pla
> > It's a gmail account. Does gmail automatically append advertisements?
>
> As far as I know, gmail does not.
This mail will tell us...
On 5/10/07, Lei Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Check out this new 3D Instant Messenger called IMVU. It's the best I
> > > have seen yet!
>
> > How much time it needs to be asked so that you stopped posting
> advertisements?
> > If
On 5/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Check out this new 3D Instant Messenger called IMVU. It's the best I
> > have seen yet!
> How much time it needs to be asked so that you stopped posting
advertisements?
> If you are participating on a developers list behave accordingl
Opinions contained in this e-mail do not necessarily reflect
the opinions of the Queensland Department of Main Roads,
Queensland Transport or Maritime Safety Queensland, or
endorsed organisations utilising the same infrastructure.
If you
> > Check out this new 3D Instant Messenger called IMVU. It's the best I
> > have seen yet!
> How much time it needs to be asked so that you stopped posting
advertisements?
> If you are participating on a developers list behave accordingly.
It's a gmail account. Does gmail automatically append a
Am Donnerstag 10 Mai 2007 22:33 schrieb H. Verbeet:
> On 10/05/07, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -}
> > +};
>
> Any particular reason for this change?
I don't think so. Must have slipped in accidentally.
> > +if (Flags & WINED3DSPD_IUNKNOWN) {
> > +if(S
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 12:13 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Misha Koshelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > +case VT_BSTR: /* Return value of specified key if it
> > exists */
> > +if (ret == ERROR_SUCCESS)
> > +{
> > +
On 10/05/07, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-}
+};
Any particular reason for this change?
+if (Flags & WINED3DSPD_IUNKNOWN) {
+if(SizeOfData != 4) {
+WARN("IUnknown data with size %d, returning
WINED3DERR_INVALIDCALL\n", SizeOfData);
+
Am Donnerstag 10 Mai 2007 21:57 schrieb Stefan Dösinger:
> WineD3D: Implement DDBLT_DEPTHFILL on the active depth stencil target
Ooops
From 1aa1e3dac36707f28865ad887ec076579ea6c7a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Doesinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 21:10:49 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] WineD3D: Implement DDBLT_DEPTHFILL on the active depth stencil target
---
dlls/wined3d/surface.c | 33 +++
Whilst trying to convert cmd to Unicode, I've stumbled across a problem
which I either need to work around or fix, and I am not sure which.
WCHAR h[] = {'h','e','l','l','o','\0'};
WCHAR fmt[] = {':', '%', '1', '0','s',':','\0'};
char test[255];
WCHAR result[255];
sprintf(test, "'%10s'"
Am Donnerstag 10 Mai 2007 19:13 schrieb Jeremy White:
> > Blizzard is at least co-operating with TransGaming on World of Warcraft,
> > so they are at least aware that there are Linux users out there. :)
> >
> > Perhaps someone could act as a representative for CodeWeavers? It might
> > make Blizza
> The closest thing I've ever seen was a steam-based hardware survey Valve
> released a couple of years ago. Even then, there were tens of thousands
> of Wine users playing Steam games.
How did you see that? I'm always looking for "Direct3D HAL" 3D cards, but I
never saw anything like that there.
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 12:05 -0500, Tom Spear wrote:
> On 5/10/07, Scott Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does anyone have statistics we can present about how many Wine users
> > playing Blizzard games there are out there?
> >
> > The closest thing I've ever seen was a steam-based hardware sur
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:39:31AM -0700, Duane Clark wrote:
> Dan Hipschman wrote:
> >Well, I sent this quite a while ago and it hasn't shown up on the list yet.
> >It's probably too big, so here's a link to the patch instead of inlining
> >it.
> >
>
> Patches over 80KB will go to a queue for mo
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:47:26AM +0100, Robert Shearman wrote:
> Dan Hipschman wrote:
> >This patch just simplifies the make_safearray function. It didn't need
> >to be that complicated. I tested the generated headers and typelibs
> >with this patch applied (well, I do that with every patch in
> Blizzard is at least co-operating with TransGaming on World of Warcraft, so
> they are at least aware that there are Linux users out there. :)
>
> Perhaps someone could act as a representative for CodeWeavers? It might make
> Blizzard more attentive. I can try to get some info from TransGami
On 5/10/07, Scott Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone have statistics we can present about how many Wine users
playing Blizzard games there are out there?
The closest thing I've ever seen was a steam-based hardware survey Valve
released a couple of years ago. Even then, there were te
Torsdag 10 mai 2007 18:46, skrev Scott Ritchie:
> On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 08:22 +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 May 2007 05:34, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > > Hey, that's only an hour away, maybe I / Lei / Nigel can drop by.
> > >
> > > But what's the "itchy /etc/hosts bug"? Is that
> > > http://bu
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 08:22 +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 May 2007 05:34, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > Hey, that's only an hour away, maybe I / Lei / Nigel can drop by.
> >
> > But what's the "itchy /etc/hosts bug"? Is that
> > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7929 ?
>
> I would assume so.
"Tom Spear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/10/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, you should make a new define. MAX_STRING_LEN is the maximum
length for a string from the resource file, which is totally unrelated
to the limit for the length of a subkey name.
Should the new defi
On 5/10/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, you should make a new define. MAX_STRING_LEN is the maximum
length for a string from the resource file, which is totally unrelated
to the limit for the length of a subkey name.
Should the new define be put in resource.h, main.c, or somew
"Tim Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+GetServiceDisplayName(SCManager, service_name, NULL, &buffer_size);
+if(!buffer_size)
You need to check the GetServiceDisplayName retrun value, not buffer_size.
If GetServiceDisplayName succeeds buffer_size contains valid length.
Also please
On 5/10/07, Tom Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MAX_STRING_LEN is defined in resource.h at 255. According to
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms724872.aspx the limit for
the length of a subkey name is 255.
>> Please let me know if I should make a new define instead of using
MAX_STRING_
"Kirill K. Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [move codepages to server side]
> http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-May/039093.html
>
> Please, comment, what I did wrong? Did I miss something important?
You didn't send the changes to protocol.def (also your sequence
numbering is
Hi,
In my serie of four patches the two has not been applied:
[kernel32/tests: Add tests for console codepages]
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-May/039092.html
[move codepages to server side]
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-May/039093.html
Please, comment,
Dan Hipschman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, I sent this quite a while ago and it hasn't shown up on the list yet.
> It's probably too big, so here's a link to the patch instead of inlining it.
Please don't do that. You can gzip the patch if necessary, but please
send it by mail.
--
Alexan
Misha Koshelev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +case VT_BSTR: /* Return value of specified key if it
> exists */
> +if (ret == ERROR_SUCCESS)
> +{
> +ret = RegQueryValueExW(hkey, V_BSTR(&varg2),
> NUL
Eric Pouech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +hFile = CreateFileW(name, GENERIC_READ, 0, NULL, OPEN_EXISTING, 0, 0);
> +if (hFile != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
> +{
> +hMap = CreateFileMappingW(hFile, NULL, PAGE_READONLY, 0, 0, NULL);
> +if (hMap != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
> +
Dan Hipschman wrote:
This patch just simplifies the make_safearray function. It didn't need
to be that complicated. I tested the generated headers and typelibs
with this patch applied (well, I do that with every patch in this series),
and this doesn't change anything.
Is dlls/oleaut32/test
Eric Pouech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +if (actctx->num_assemblies == actctx->allocated_assemblies)
> +{
> +if (actctx->allocated_assemblies)
> +{
> +actctx->allocated_assemblies *= 2;
> +actctx->assemblies = HeapReAlloc(GetProcessHeap(),
> HEAP_
+static void test_MultiByteToWideChar(void)
+{
+int i, ret;
+static char src[32];
+static WCHAR dst[32];
+static const WCHAR glyphed_dst[32] = {
+0x, 0x263A, 0x263B, 0x2665, 0x2666, 0x2663, 0x2660, 0x2022,
+0x25D8, 0x25CB, 0x25D9, 0x2642, 0x2640, 0x266A, 0x266B,
33 matches
Mail list logo
