Tim Schwartz wrote:
+if(!strcasecmp(operation, "start"))
+{
+printf("The %s service is starting.\n", service_display_name);
+result = StartService(serviceHandle,0,NULL);
+CloseServiceHandle(serviceHandle);
+if(!result) printf("The %s service failed to start.
Tom Spear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I just remembered reading somewhere (wiki, perhaps?) that the ultimate goal
of wine
>(aside from documenting the windows api, etc) was to provide open-source
drop-in
>replacements for windows' core dll's. If that is the case, do we have a
framework
>set
"Dmitry Timoshkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+if(!buffer_size)
+{
The check above is wrong.
Please ignore this one.
--
Dmitry.
"Tim Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+GetServiceDisplayName(SCManager, service_name, NULL, &buffer_size);
You need to check GetServiceDisplayName return value here and later.
+/* until GetServiceDisplayName() is implemented, buffer_size will always be zero so the service short na
Hi Juan,
Thanks for your explanations. I'm resubmitting the patch.
Mounir IDRASSI
IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts
http://www.idrix.fr
Juan Lang wrote:
> Yes, certainly. See e.g. recent patches from Paul Vriens to get the tests
> succeeding on Win9x.
> --Juan
>
Hi again Mounir,
> For CRYPT_SEC_DESCR, my previous implementation of the patch tested for
> it with an "&" as you are suggesting. But, after Alexandre Julliard
> comment, I no more check the current version of windows and return
> always CRYPT_SEC_DESCR in RSAENH_CPGetProvParam. So, that's why I
For CRYPT_SEC_DESCR, my previous implementation of the patch tested for it with
an "&" as you are suggesting. But, after Alexandre Julliard comment, I no more
check the current version of windows and return always CRYPT_SEC_DESCR in
RSAENH_CPGetProvParam. So, that's why I put an "==" instead to
Hi Mounir,
+case PP_KEYSTORAGE:
+dwTemp = CRYPT_SEC_DESCR;
This looks fine..
+result = CryptGetProvParam(prov, PP_KEYSTORAGE, (LPBYTE)&dwParam,
&dataLen, 0);
+ok(result && dataLen == sizeof(dwParam) && (dwParam ==
CRYPT_SEC_DESCR),
+"Expected CRYPT_SEC_DESCR t
Actually, the only application I know that uses this expects only
CRYPT_SEC_DESCR. So, as you advised, I'll rewrite the patch to remove
the version check.
Mounir IDRASSI
IDRIX - Cryptography and IT Security Experts
http://www.idrix.fr
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Mounir IDRASSI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 5/8/07, Thorsten Kani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Tom
Please read through wwn244 and 245.
If i remenber correctly, at that time common controls from wine wont
work out of the box.
I had to apply reactos patches to them and had to binary patch sfc.dll
on windows.
Thanks for the info. I h
On 5/8/07, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
All files in the destination directory (usually 'Program Files') are cleaned up,
but sometimes not the files/directories in the temp directory. We have to make
sure we have a clean start for every test.
I've also changed a filename from 'pat
> I think it would be interesting to see how much of windows will run
> with wine's dlls in their current state. Obviously it would be bad to
> test this with something like user32.dll, etc, but something like
> riched32 and maybe some of the common controls dlls should be ok to
> test with?
There
On 5/8/07, Brian Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/8/07, Tom Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That would be the framework. I appreciate the response. Is this
> something that either now or in the future will be officially
> supported by wine, or even a true goal of wine, or is it more o
On 5/8/07, Steven Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/8/07, Tom Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just remembered reading somewhere (wiki, perhaps?) that the ultimate
> goal of wine (aside from documenting the windows api, etc) was to
> provide open-source drop-in replacements for windows'
On 5/8/07, Tom Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just remembered reading somewhere (wiki, perhaps?) that the ultimate
goal of wine (aside from documenting the windows api, etc) was to
provide open-source drop-in replacements for windows' core dll's. If
that is the case, do we have a framework s
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 19:27, Tom Spear wrote:
> I kinda tend to agree, but the question on their end would be
> something along the lines of "with most users using dynamic ip's, how
> do you propose that we link the hostname to the current ip?"
Personally I don't know if I'd like to have that. I
Robert Shearman wrote:
Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
This makes the setupapi tests run again on win98.
Changelog
SetupQueryInfOriginalFileInformationA is not available on win98
Weird. From http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa377417.aspx:
"Requires Windows Vista, Windows XP, Windows 2000 P
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:19:16AM -0500, Tom Spear wrote:
> static const DWORD MAXSUBKEYNAMELEN = 255;
> WCHAR subKeyName[MAXSUBKEYNAMELEN + 1];
I'm not sure what version of C wine is strictly trying to conform to,
but it's usually best to go with the lowest common denominator. This is
not C89.
Jeff Latimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +typedef enum NET_FW_PROFILE_TYPE_
> +{
> +NET_FW_PROFILE_DOMAIN = 1,
> +NET_FW_PROFILE_STANDARD = 2,
> +NET_FW_PROFILE_CURRENT = 3,
> +NET_FW_PROFILE_TYPE_MAX = 4
> +} NET_FW_PROFILE_TYPE;
> +
> +typedef enum NET_FW_IP_VERSION_
> +{
> +
Mounir IDRASSI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +case PP_KEYSTORAGE:
> +dwTemp = GetVersion();
> +/* for Windows NT, 95,98, Me, return CRYPT_PSTORE |
> CRYPT_UI_PROMPT | CRYPT_SEC_DESCR
> + * for the others, return CRYPT_SEC_DESCR
> + */
> +
On 5/8/07, Tom Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/8/07, Jesse Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/7/07, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 May 2007 05:34, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > > Hey, that's only an hour away, maybe I / Lei / Nigel can drop by.
> > >
> > > But what's the
Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
This makes the setupapi tests run again on win98.
Changelog
SetupQueryInfOriginalFileInformationA is not available on win98
Weird. From http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa377417.aspx:
"Requires Windows Vista, Windows XP, Windows 2000 Professional,
Windows NT
On 5/8/07, Jesse Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/7/07, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 May 2007 05:34, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > Hey, that's only an hour away, maybe I / Lei / Nigel can drop by.
> >
> > But what's the "itchy /etc/hosts bug"? Is that
> > http://bugs.winehq.or
On 5/7/07, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 05:34, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Hey, that's only an hour away, maybe I / Lei / Nigel can drop by.
>
> But what's the "itchy /etc/hosts bug"? Is that
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7929 ?
I would assume so. I don't know if
I just remembered reading somewhere (wiki, perhaps?) that the ultimate
goal of wine (aside from documenting the windows api, etc) was to
provide open-source drop-in replacements for windows' core dll's. If
that is the case, do we have a framework setup for building the wine
dlls as windows .dll f
Zalmay A-khaliq a écrit :
Respected Developers of the wine
My name is Zalmay And I am a BCS student.
I have been assigned to port windows(VC++) application into linux.
After a thorough searching and researching I found that "wine:" is the
resource I can use to port a windows 32 bit application t
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 05:34, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Hey, that's only an hour away, maybe I / Lei / Nigel can drop by.
>
> But what's the "itchy /etc/hosts bug"? Is that
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7929 ?
I would assume so. I don't know if telling them is going to fix anything,
though.
Respected Developers of the wine
My name is Zalmay And I am a BCS student.
I have been assigned to port windows(VC++) application into linux.
After a thorough searching and researching I found that "wine:" is the
resource I can use to port a windows 32 bit application to Linux.
I download
On 5/7/07, Andrey Turkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dan, CopyFileA does not leaks a string (note BOOL flags). Instead first
call use static TEB-based buffer so this is OK, given that recursion is
impossible in this case.
Whoops! Sorry, I should have remembered that.
(And I meant to insert "see
"James Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've looked into the problem a bit more. It seems the only way to add
> a dos device is through explorer, by way of hal. This works fine for
> a CD in the physical drive, as hal notifies explorer that there is a
> CD in the drive, and explorer adds t
Misha Koshelev wrote:
Hi, thank you very much for your help.
I am implementing Installer::RegistryValue for MSI OLE automation and I need a
way to tell apart
a VT_EMPTY and a VT_I4 type variant with a value of 0 as these have two
different behaviors for this
function under Windows XP. I have n
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 2:39 am, Andrey Turkin wrote:
> Kevin, you are setting file size before copy starts. I'm not sure
> Windows does so; also how would that work if destination file system
> does not support sparse files?
This is what windows does (at least XP)
SetEndOfFile does not create a s
Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> Misha Koshelev wrote:
>
>>Hi, thank you very much for your help.
>>
>>I am implementing Installer::RegistryValue for MSI OLE automation and I need
>>a way to tell apart
>>a VT_EMPTY and a VT_I4 type variant with a value of 0 as these have two
>>different behaviors for
Misha Koshelev wrote:
> Hi, thank you very much for your help.
>
> I am implementing Installer::RegistryValue for MSI OLE automation and I need
> a way to tell apart
> a VT_EMPTY and a VT_I4 type variant with a value of 0 as these have two
> different behaviors for this
> function under Windows
Am Dienstag 08 Mai 2007 02:13 schrieb Christian Gmeiner:
> Add support for DllCanUnloadNow and eliminates a FIXME
As I understand it, all DirectDraw objects also have to be freed, so you have
to check the global ddraw object list too.
pgp0AYsUCVIOw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
"Vitaly Budovski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Both floats and integers have their share of problems. Since the square
root operation has been removed, we are dealing with much larger
numbers, potentially larger than can fit into unsigned int without
looping back around. T
36 matches
Mail list logo
