Kirill K. Smirnov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed very strange thing today: www.winehq.org resolves to
> http://searchportal.information.com/index.mas?epl=00630086VFAXVE0DWlgV
> VRBeVwtAVw5ZB14NW1YMBAhCUVZRWRQbWxBfHwRsXQUNU1oBVFc
>
> This site claims to be winehq.org.
>
> "Winehq.org - What you n
Say, that post is hard to read at the main archive:
http://winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2007-April/055817.html
but it's more readable at another archive,
http://marc.info/?l=wine-devel&m=117624165731188&w=2
On 4/10/07, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about Photoshop 5? We still have one bug open against it:
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7909
Version 5.5 is here:
ftp://ftp1.adobe.com/pub/adobe/magic/photoshop/win/5.x/ps55try.exe
Thanks for all the info. I've collected it
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 13:13 -0500, Jeremy White wrote:
> Hi Philip,
>
> Philip A. Marshall wrote:
> > While we're on the subject, I've got a question about the situation. I
> > know I can go to Codeweavers and download the source for crossover wine.
> > But, if someone is trying to review codewea
Hi guys, I'm trying to find the source of a problem in SmartBarXP
before I make another bug about that app. Basically, with the default
setup has a pane with an advanced system monitor. In that pane is bar
graphs for CPU usage, RAM usage, Pagefile usage, HDD usage, and
Internet Speed.
From wha
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 13:21 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Kirill wrote:
> > I've noticed very strange thing today: www.winehq.org resolves to
> > http://searchportal.information.com/index.mas?epl=00630086VFAXVE0DWlgVVRBeVwtAVw5ZB14NW1YMBAhCUVZRWRQbWxBfHwRsXQUNU1oBVFc
> >
> >This site claims to be wineh
Hi,
This is an updated version of the child window patch from Chris Robinson. I
have added some fixes to it which were found by testing it with lots of
programs.
Windowed OpenGL
Several options have been discussed over the years for solving the windowed
opengl issues. The lazy option was to us
Am Dienstag, 10. April 2007 12:46 schrieb Stefan Dösinger:
> > attached you find the trace. I am wondering why it so much smaller. I was
> > also able to get a proper callstack of the crash.
> You didn't set the trace flags properly. Maybe you misspelled WINEDEBUG ?
> However, according to the cra
Kirill wrote:
I've noticed very strange thing today: www.winehq.org resolves to
http://searchportal.information.com/index.mas?epl=00630086VFAXVE0DWlgVVRBeVwtAVw5ZB14NW1YMBAhCUVZRWRQbWxBfHwRsXQUNU1oBVFc
This site claims to be winehq.org.
"Winehq.org - What you need, when you need it"
Two ideas
Yikes! That looks quite strange.
In my paranoia, here is what I did:
[jwhite] whois winehq.org | grep 'Name Server:'
Name Server:FOGHORN.CODEWEAVERS.COM
Name Server:WINE.CODEWEAVERS.COM
[jwhite] host www.winehq.org wine.codeweavers.com
www.winehq.org A 209.46.25.134
[jwhite] host
Am Dienstag 10 April 2007 21:17 schrieb Kirill K. Smirnov:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed very strange thing today: www.winehq.org resolves to
> http://searchportal.information.com/index.mas?epl=00630086VFAXVE0DWlgVVRBeV
>wtAVw5ZB14NW1YMBAhCUVZRWRQbWxBfHwRsXQUNU1oBVFc
>
> This site claims to be winehq.org.
Hi,
I've noticed very strange thing today: www.winehq.org resolves to
http://searchportal.information.com/index.mas?epl=00630086VFAXVE0DWlgVVRBeVwtAVw5ZB14NW1YMBAhCUVZRWRQbWxBfHwRsXQUNU1oBVFc
This site claims to be winehq.org.
"Winehq.org - What you need, when you need it"
I cannot perform "git
Hi Philip,
Philip A. Marshall wrote:
> While we're on the subject, I've got a question about the situation. I
> know I can go to Codeweavers and download the source for crossover wine.
> But, if someone is trying to review codeweavers patches to "fix them up"
> for wine, that isn't very convenien
While we're on the subject, I've got a question about the situation. I
know I can go to Codeweavers and download the source for crossover wine.
But, if someone is trying to review codeweavers patches to "fix them up"
for wine, that isn't very convenient (I can't imagine a diff of the
entire source
For what it's worth, I added the Edgy wine repository and used the Edgy
packages for wine 0.9.34 under Feisty. It seems to work, so I'll
probably use the Edgy repository until the Feisty repository starts up.
Hwang YunSong(ȲÀ±¼º) wrote:
Firest release
This might get accepted a little faster if you create them like this:
diff -u /dev/null wine/programs/xcopy/Ko.rc > xcopy-ko.diff
Of course, you should be in the directory where you have your Wine tree,
for that to work. Patches should not be crea
I've checked the mailing list, they don't appear to be in the list.
From: "Dmitry Timoshkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "EA Durbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Subject: Re: wine-patches
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:43:39 +0900
"EA Durbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why do the patches I send to wine-patche
Thank you for your comments, especially Stefan. I'll pick up a copy of
crossover/linux and give it to the next person I have difficulty
converting due to "must have" productivity applications.
Thanx Again,
Frank Russo
-Original Message-
From: Tim Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
EA Durbin schreef:
> Why do the patches I send to wine-patches never show up in the list?
> Are they being received?
Try subscribing to the wine-patches mailing list, if you're only
interested in sending patches you can turn off receiving messages from
that list.
"EA Durbin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why do the patches I send to wine-patches never show up in the list? Are
they being received?
How do you check? http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-April/037735.html
http://www.winehq.org/piperma
On 4/10/07, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That does help! I was able to close
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3648
with that copy of ps 6.
Cool!
How about Photoshop 5? We still have one bug open against it:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7909
Version 5.5 is here:
ft
Why do the patches I send to wine-patches never show up in the list? Are
they being received?
_
Mortgage rates near historic lows. Refinance $200,000 loan for as low as
$771/month*
https://www2.nextag.com/goto.jsp?product=1003
On 4/8/07, Tom Wickline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you downloaded an older trial copy of
> Photoshop 7 or CS1, and still have the download
> around, could you send me the md5sum?
PS 6 : http://www.tucows.com/get/214261_90608
PS 7 : ftp://download.axelero.hu/pub/multimedia/grafika/adobeps7t
Thanks. I'll try it out first with CrossOver and Wine and some older
Windows-based stuff I've got.
Wesley Parish
On Monday 09 April 2007 22:46, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> > You can install multiple Wine installations, a crossover install
> > and a cedega install on the same machine without proble
> attached you find the trace. I am wondering why it so much smaller. I was
> also able to get a proper callstack of the crash.
You didn't set the trace flags properly. Maybe you misspelled WINEDEBUG ?
However, according to the crash dump it crashes in the 3D driver, which is
rather suspicious. I
Chris Robinson wrote:
+static HRESULT WINAPI AMFilterData_CreateFilterData(IAMFilterData* iface,
+ REGFILTER2 *prf2, BYTE **pRegFilterData, ULONG *pcb)
+{
+FilterMapper2Impl *This = impl_from_IAMFilterData(iface);
+int size = sizeof(struct REG_RF);
+unsigned i
"Robert Shearman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
shell32: Since shlwapi imports ole32, there's no point in shell32
delay-importing ole32.
shlwapi has ole32 as a delay load, just like a native one does. Native shell32
also has ole32 as a delay loaded dependency. So, we might at least have ole32
as
Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> spotted by Coverity.
>
> Not all might really happen, but check for it
> anyway.
I don't think there's much point in the check, but if you do check
then you have to report a failure, you can't let the test silently
succeed without doing anything.
--
28 matches
Mail list logo
