Juan Lang wrote:
+/* find a character from a set in reverse without the string having to be
null-terminated */
+static inline WCHAR *memrpbrkW(const WCHAR *ptr, size_t n, const WCHAR
*accept)
+{
+const WCHAR *end, *ret = NULL;
+for (end = ptr + n; ptr < end; ptr++) if (strchrW(accept, *pt
Bill Medland wrote:
I just tripped over this; I think it crept in over the past couple of
weeks. Anyone know what's going on? I'm not going to waste days
searching for it if it is obvious to someone.
wine: Call from 0x126ce72 to unimplemented function
nspr4.dll.PR_GetPhysicalMemorySize, aborti
Am Mittwoch 28 März 2007 01:48 schrieb Dan Kegel:
> But you can't do this:
> > + * Copyright (C) the Wine project
>
> as there's no legal entity called "the Wine project". You have
> to use your company's name, I think. (And be sure they've
> granted permission.) Or if you have the rights to wh
Hi Axel,
some days ago, I tried to run the retail management software, we are developing
in our
company now for over 15 years, with Wine on Linux. Unfortunatly it didn't work.
The reason was not our product itself, but the ODBC driver form MS for
MS-SQL-Server.
It uses a command for WSAIoctl i
On Tue, 2007-27-03 at 23:32 +0200, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> Am Dienstag 27 März 2007 23:18 schrieb Bill Medland:
> > I just tripped over this; I think it crept in over the past couple of
> > weeks. Anyone know what's going on? I'm not going to waste days
> > searching for it if it is obvious to s
Am Dienstag 27 März 2007 23:18 schrieb Bill Medland:
> I just tripped over this; I think it crept in over the past couple of
> weeks. Anyone know what's going on? I'm not going to waste days
> searching for it if it is obvious to someone.
>
> wine: Call from 0x126ce72 to unimplemented function
>
Tirsdag 27 mars 2007 15:34, skrev Ben Hodgetts (Enverex):
> I just noticed an issue with the AppDB while I was browsing. The data
> from the latest submission is shown by default, but it doesn't appear in
> the table of testing data (the block below which says what OS, version,
> ratings, etc). So
I just tripped over this; I think it crept in over the past couple of
weeks. Anyone know what's going on? I'm not going to waste days
searching for it if it is obvious to someone.
wine: Call from 0x126ce72 to unimplemented function
nspr4.dll.PR_GetPhysicalMemorySize, aborting
wine: Unimplemented
Juan Lang wrote:
Hi Rob,
+ok(!lstrcmpW(display_name, expected_display_name), "%s: display name
wasn't what was expected\n", testname);
Can you pass a WCHAR * when the string format is %s?
display_name is WCHAR *, but testname is char *.
--
Rob Shearman
Tirsdag 27 mars 2007 22:41, skrev Ann & Jason Edmeades:
> Hiya,
>
> If adding files for translation to a new directory (xcopy), can anyone
> confirm of deny whether the following is all I need to do:
>
> 1. Add rsrc.rc containing (* - see below)
> #include
> #include "resources.h"
>
Hiya,
If adding files for translation to a new directory (xcopy), can anyone
confirm of deny whether the following is all I need to do:
1. Add rsrc.rc containing (* - see below)
#include
#include "resources.h"
LANGUAGE LANG_NEUTRAL, SUBLANG_NEUTRAL
#include "En.rc
Hi Rob,
+ok(!lstrcmpW(display_name, expected_display_name), "%s: display name
wasn't what was expected\n", testname);
Can you pass a WCHAR * when the string format is %s?
--Juan
The fish are biting.
Get
Hi Rob,
+/* find a character from a set in reverse without the string having to be
null-terminated */
+static inline WCHAR *memrpbrkW(const WCHAR *ptr, size_t n, const WCHAR
*accept)
+{
+const WCHAR *end, *ret = NULL;
+for (end = ptr + n; ptr < end; ptr++) if (strchrW(accept, *ptr)) ret
=
Dan Kegel a écrit :
On 3/27/07, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Dan!
I was curious how the SoC thing proceedes from now. The application
deadline
is now over, but who got the applications? Did you get them, or are they
reviewed internally by Google? Who will be in charge for acce
On 3/27/07, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Dan!
I was curious how the SoC thing proceedes from now. The application deadline
is now over, but who got the applications? Did you get them, or are they
reviewed internally by Google? Who will be in charge for accepting them?
Google re
I just noticed an issue with the AppDB while I was browsing. The data
from the latest submission is shown by default, but it doesn't appear in
the table of testing data (the block below which says what OS, version,
ratings, etc). So it means you're unable to edit the latest submitted
test data for
"James Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Changelog:
> * The Inf file should be copied regardless of the destination buffer.
It doesn't seem right to copy the file and then return an error when
the buffer is too small.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"James Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ SRCDIR= @srcdir@
> VPATH = @srcdir@
> MODULE= setupapi.dll
> IMPORTLIB = libsetupapi.$(IMPLIBEXT)
> -IMPORTS = user32 version advapi32 rpcrt4 kernel32 ntdll
> +IMPORTS = user32 version advapi32 rpcrt4 kernel32 ntdll s
Jacek Caban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I forgot to remove DestroyWindow form Release, sorry. This patch also
> takes care of unloading DLL. It's really worth doing as it prevents
> creating a lot of useless windows.
It still won't work, because you cannot destroy a window belonging to
another
19 matches
Mail list logo
