RE: xcopy / cmd question (lack of real exe in system32)

2007-03-22 Thread Alexander.Farber
Hello Jason, I'm just curious: xcopy.exe is an external program in Windows, but you want to make it a builtin command in Wine? Regards Alex > -Original Message- > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ext Ann > & Jason Edmeades > > If I now run "wine xcopy", then it works (and gives

Re: Road to 1.0

2007-03-22 Thread Scott Ritchie
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 23:38 -0400, Tom Wickline wrote: > Hello all, > > Just thought I would through in my $.02 > > I see Wine 1.0 as a set of features that AJ has decided upon, once the > feature set is in the tree then a feature freeze will go onto effect.. > Then one to six months of only bug

Re: Road to 1.0

2007-03-22 Thread Scott Ritchie
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 16:25 +0100, Vit Hrachovy wrote: > However, usage scenarios for automated SW installer applications offer far > more. > > First, it somehow mirrors info from AppDB. It can display application > usability for > range of WINE versions and also make available application on ol

Re: Winebot / Wine-Doors Was: Road to 1.0

2007-03-22 Thread Tom Wickline
I have a request of these third party tool developers Please add a link on your front page to the WineHQ PayPal account for Donations! Thank You! Tom Wickline

Winebot / Wine-Doors Was: Road to 1.0

2007-03-22 Thread Jan Zerebecki
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 10:03:46PM -0600, James Hawkins wrote: > If developers working on projects such as Wine-Doors > contributed to Wine, then the bugs would be fixed even faster. I think that this is not necessarily (always) true, probably not even most of the time. Does a developer of e.g. W

Re: Winebot / Wine-Doors Was: Road to 1.0

2007-03-22 Thread James Hawkins
On 3/22/07, Jan Zerebecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I Cc-ed Karl Lattimer from Wine-Doors to also ask him if the provisions detailed here are also compatible with his views of Wine-Doors. Something like Winebot could possibly save me much time while testing and developing. I reinstalled certai

Re: Road to 1.0

2007-03-22 Thread James Hawkins
On 3/22/07, Bryan Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you are making it extremely easy for users to run with native dlls > and hacky workarounds, then you are hurting Wine. Wine is still beta, That's true... and people technically should only be using wine for the pure sake of testing an

Re: Road to 1.0

2007-03-22 Thread Tom Wickline
Hello all, Just thought I would through in my $.02 I see Wine 1.0 as a set of features that AJ has decided upon, once the feature set is in the tree then a feature freeze will go onto effect.. Then one to six months of only bug fixes. Then wala 1.0 is born. At the last Conf if memory serves me

Winebot / Wine-Doors Was: Road to 1.0

2007-03-22 Thread Jan Zerebecki
I Cc-ed Karl Lattimer from Wine-Doors to also ask him if the provisions detailed here are also compatible with his views of Wine-Doors. Something like Winebot could possibly save me much time while testing and developing. I reinstalled certain applications or workarounds countless times, automati

Re: WinRAR installer icon creation, and the Start Menu folder

2007-03-22 Thread Jan Zerebecki
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 01:22:38PM -0500, Tom Spear wrote: > Why, if we create folders like Desktop and My Documents, under the > fake windows directory, do we not create a Start Menu folder? We do create it during wineprefixcreate. .wine/drive_c/windows/profiles/username/Start Menu Jan

Re: Supreme Commander Up and running!

2007-03-22 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Donnerstag 22 März 2007 23:59 schrieb H. Verbeet: > On 22/03/07, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The problem that occurs here is that some vertex attribute type can't be > > set in the glVertexAttribfv calling loop. Most likely because I didn't > > figure out which gl call takes t

Re: Supreme Commander Up and running!

2007-03-22 Thread H. Verbeet
On 22/03/07, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The problem that occurs here is that some vertex attribute type can't be set in the glVertexAttribfv calling loop. Most likely because I didn't figure out which gl call takes the precise argument. Should be easy to figure out. NV_half_floa

Re: Improving DirectDraw OpenGL renderer for SoC?

2007-03-22 Thread Stefan Dösinger
> A pity. > > What about fixing Bug #2666, about how the menu text colour is 'lost' in > Age of Empires I & II. I know these games are not really playable without > a DIB engine, but they won't be properly playable either without the > campaign texts etc. I apologize if I seem a bit hasty, but th

Re: Supreme Commander Up and running!

2007-03-22 Thread Stefan Dösinger
> I've done some searching on the net for an instancing extension and two > seem to exist: Right now we handle instancing with some kind of software emulation. Roughtly it works like this: /* Non-instanced attribs are set as stream sources in opengl */ for(i = 0; i < num_instances; i++) { for

Re: SoC idea: add BITS support

2007-03-22 Thread Kai Blin
On Thursday 22 March 2007 19:39, Carl Fongheiser wrote: > Try reading the stuff under "About BITS", in particular the page titled > "Life Cycle of a BITS Job". > It states quite clearly there that it uses HTTP or HTTPS (or SMB in newer > versions). Nothing mysterious. Yes, I know, it's still not

Re: Supreme Commander Up and running!

2007-03-22 Thread Markus
On Thursday 22 March 2007 18:16, you wrote: > On 22/03/07, Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any chance instancing will be implemented any time soon? > > We've got instancing support, although there may be bugs. That > particular datatype isn't supported though. I'm not sure how hard it > would

SoC idea: Get Mono working well enough to run simple apps

2007-03-22 Thread Dan Kegel
There are lots of little bits, some pretty basic, which Wine is missing before it can support mixed assemblies in Mono. For instance, http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7098 says that we're missing an implementation of mscoree.dll.CorBindToRuntimeEx. This would probably be a fine area for an

SoC idea: Get Java working well enough to run Tomcat, installers, etc.

2007-03-22 Thread Dan Kegel
There are a lot of little bits in Wine that are missing before Java can run smoothly. (Yes, Virginia, we need win32 JVMs to run in Wine, for many reasons: some installers require them, some apps bundle them, and some people just plain want to run the win32 version of some apps because that's what

Re: [1/7] - [6/7] wined3d: Implement linear fog with pixel shader and some other patches

2007-03-22 Thread Mirek
Perfect work!! nVidia VertexMorph demo is fixed and some other games too. Mirek

Re: Road to 1.0

2007-03-22 Thread Bryan Haskins
If you are making it extremely easy for users to run with native dlls and hacky workarounds, then you are hurting Wine. Wine is still beta, That's true... and people technically should only be using wine for the pure sake of testing and helping fix usage. LEt's be honest, very few use it fo

Re: Improving DirectDraw OpenGL renderer for SoC?

2007-03-22 Thread Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
Onsdag 21 mars 2007 20:32, skrev du : > Am Mittwoch 21 März 2007 20:01 schrieb Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes: > > Greetings, > > > > i am thinking about participating in the Summer of Code, and thought it > > would be interesting to improve DirectDraw such that Command & Conquer > > Tiberian Sun & Re

Re: SoC: improving Star Wars Empire at War support

2007-03-22 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Hi, > 1. Is this a weaker, or less useful to WINE, proposal because it would lead > to likely result in more bug hunting than feature writing? This is quite a > bit more open ended than working on a specific WINE feature (such as Rich > Text Editing). Bug hunting and fixing is not a bad thing to d

DIB engine and cairo

2007-03-22 Thread Alessandro Pignotti
Hi everyone, i'm not a dib engine nor a cairo expert, so i don't know if this is totally crazy. Anyway, could it be possible to use cairo as a backend for our dib engine? cairo support drawing on image buffers, that should be device indipendent and rendered client side. Regards, Alessandro Pign

Re: [5/7] wined3d: Fix glsl texbem instruction for projective textures

2007-03-22 Thread Fabian Bieler
On Thursday 22 March 2007 20:34, H. Verbeet wrote: > On 22/03/07, Fabian Bieler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +shader_addline(arg->buffer, "T%u%s /= T%u%s;\n", sampler_idx, > > coord_mask, sampler_idx, coord_div_mask); > > Are you sure that's correct? This will modify the coordinates for >

Re: [5/7] wined3d: Fix glsl texbem instruction for projective textures

2007-03-22 Thread H. Verbeet
On 22/03/07, Fabian Bieler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you sure that's correct? This will modify the coordinates for > later instructions as well. The texbem instruction can only be used in pixel shaders up to version 1.3, so the data in the used texture coordinate register is overwritten wi

Re: Build script for older RPM distros

2007-03-22 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
Hi, On 22.03.2007 20:12, Lei Zhang wrote: > It looks like we have not been doing a good job of maintaining Wine > RPMs for older RH (derived) systems. On the Wine download page > (http://www.winehq.org/site/download) the text link for RH/Fedora is a > 404, and the icon links to an out of date page

Re: [5/7] wined3d: Fix glsl texbem instruction for projective textures

2007-03-22 Thread H. Verbeet
On 22/03/07, Fabian Bieler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +shader_addline(arg->buffer, "T%u%s /= T%u%s;\n", sampler_idx, coord_mask, sampler_idx, coord_div_mask); Are you sure that's correct? This will modify the coordinates for later instructions as well.

Re: netapi32 tests not linked with netapi32.dll

2007-03-22 Thread Paul Vriens
Mikołaj Zalewski wrote: Paul Vriens wrote: Hi, Could anyone think of a reason that the netapi32 tests are not linked with netapi32.dll although this is specified in the Makefile? It looks like the tests doesn't call directly any function from netapi32. In such a case the compiler can skip

Build script for older RPM distros

2007-03-22 Thread Lei Zhang
Hi, It looks like we have not been doing a good job of maintaining Wine RPMs for older RH (derived) systems. On the Wine download page (http://www.winehq.org/site/download) the text link for RH/Fedora is a 404, and the icon links to an out of date page: http://www.winehq.org/site/download-rh. Do

Re: netapi32 tests not linked with netapi32.dll

2007-03-22 Thread Mikołaj Zalewski
Paul Vriens wrote: Hi, Could anyone think of a reason that the netapi32 tests are not linked with netapi32.dll although this is specified in the Makefile? It looks like the tests doesn't call directly any function from netapi32. In such a case the compiler can skip linking the DLL (e.g. V

Re: automatically running wineprefixcreate

2007-03-22 Thread James Hawkins
On 3/22/07, Tom Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/22/07, Tom Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/22/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Like Alexandre said, users shouldn't be moving drive_c itself, only > > .wine. And if you do move drive_c, you need to know what you're > >

Re: SoC idea: add BITS support

2007-03-22 Thread Carl Fongheiser
On 3/22/07, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 22 March 2007 18:43, James Hawkins wrote: > Check out: > > http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa362820.aspx That's what I was reading. It provides good information about the COM interface, but not about the implementation. Tr

Re: automatically running wineprefixcreate

2007-03-22 Thread Tom Spear
On 3/22/07, Tom Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/22/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Like Alexandre said, users shouldn't be moving drive_c itself, only > .wine. And if you do move drive_c, you need to know what you're > doing. For the average user, moving .wine only requires

SoC: improving Star Wars Empire at War support

2007-03-22 Thread Bryan DeGrendel
I have been thinking about a few different ideas for WINE/SoC. One of the official possible ideas is to improve a non-working application. My proposal would be to improve WINE's support for Star Wars: Empire at War (which currently has a garbage rating on both WINE [ http://appdb.winehq.org/appv

netapi32 tests not linked with netapi32.dll

2007-03-22 Thread Paul Vriens
Hi, Could anyone think of a reason that the netapi32 tests are not linked with netapi32.dll although this is specified in the Makefile? I just had a look with PE Explorer at the crosstest executable and it didn't contain the netapi32.dll. The ds-test now skips all these tests on both Wine a

WinRAR installer icon creation, and the Start Menu folder

2007-03-22 Thread Tom Spear
Yet another topic about the start menu, I know. This one is just a curiosity really. Why, if we create folders like Desktop and My Documents, under the fake windows directory, do we not create a Start Menu folder? I ask because WinRAR's installer looks for the Start Menu folder in various locat

Re: automatically running wineprefixcreate

2007-03-22 Thread Tom Spear
On 3/22/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Like Alexandre said, users shouldn't be moving drive_c itself, only .wine. And if you do move drive_c, you need to know what you're doing. For the average user, moving .wine only requires changing WINEPREFIX, no symlinks needed. Ok, so the

Re: Problem with program

2007-03-22 Thread Lei Zhang
Please file a bug at http://bugs.winehq.org/ On 3/21/07, Guillén Cambil, Enrique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Using wine "memoriesontv" it does not show the images and the generation of video interrupts

Re: SoC idea: add BITS support

2007-03-22 Thread Kai Blin
On Thursday 22 March 2007 18:43, James Hawkins wrote: > On 3/22/07, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 22 March 2007 16:00, Dan Kegel wrote: > > > Several applications require BITS (Background Intelligent Transfer > > > Service). Adding an implementation of BITS would be quite usef

Re: SoC idea: add BITS support

2007-03-22 Thread James Hawkins
On 3/22/07, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 22 March 2007 16:00, Dan Kegel wrote: > Several applications require BITS (Background Intelligent Transfer > Service). Adding an implementation of BITS would be quite useful. This intrigued me, so I poked at the information on BITS a li

Re: Road to 1.0

2007-03-22 Thread Dan Kegel
On 3/22/07, Vit Hrachovy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: For example Ubuntu Dapper Drake (6.06) will distribute and support Wine 0.9.9 for four years from now. I suspect they will be willing to update Drake to wine-1.0 when we release it, since it will be far, far superior to wine-0.9.9. Automated

Re: SoC idea: add BITS support

2007-03-22 Thread Kai Blin
On Thursday 22 March 2007 18:06, Juan Lang wrote: > > Anyway, I don't know what shape our iphlpapi is in, but I think it > > should be possible to at least get the basic features working in the > > context of a SoC project. > > Okay, I'll bite. I looked at the BITS docs too, and it uses > GetBestI

Re: SoC idea: add BITS support

2007-03-22 Thread Kai Blin
On Thursday 22 March 2007 18:03, Jesse Allen wrote: > > Go for it, people, only three days to do some more research on this. :) > > Is three days enough? How much are we really supposed to know before > we apply for a project? If I take this idea for example, I don't know > anything at all about i

Re: Supreme Commander Up and running!

2007-03-22 Thread H. Verbeet
On 22/03/07, Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday 21 March 2007 16:08, Stefan Dösinger wrote: > Am Mittwoch 21 März 2007 14:31 schrieb H. Verbeet: > > That'll do it. Looks like it's not so much the GLSL implementation as > > the different caps we return when GLSL is used. > > Ah yes, In

Re: Allow enabling/disabling Direct3D usage of GLSL in Winecfg

2007-03-22 Thread H. Verbeet
On 22/03/07, Vit Hrachovy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, according to thread 'WineCfg and DirectX options' at wine-devel, I'm proposing a patch for winecfg to allow enabling/disabling usage of GLSL for Direct3D applications rendering. Patch will add a checkbox into Graphics -> Direct 3D section o

Re: Supreme Commander Up and running!

2007-03-22 Thread Markus
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 16:08, Stefan Dösinger wrote: > Am Mittwoch 21 März 2007 14:31 schrieb H. Verbeet: > > That'll do it. Looks like it's not so much the GLSL implementation as > > the different caps we return when GLSL is used. > > Ah yes, Instancing makes sense for a real time strategy gam

Re: SoC idea: add BITS support

2007-03-22 Thread Juan Lang
> Anyway, I don't know what shape our iphlpapi is in, but I think it > should be possible to at least get the basic features working in the > context of a SoC project. Okay, I'll bite. I looked at the BITS docs too, and it uses GetBestInterface to pick an interface, and some interface stats to de

Re: SoC idea: add BITS support

2007-03-22 Thread Jesse Allen
On 3/22/07, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 22 March 2007 16:00, Dan Kegel wrote: > Several applications require BITS (Background Intelligent Transfer > Service). Adding an implementation of BITS would be quite useful. This intrigued me, so I poked at the information on BITS a li

Re: Sugestion: A few changes to the

2007-03-22 Thread James Hawkins
On 3/21/07, Giles Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Robert Shearman wrote: > Giles Cameron wrote: >> After learning about the wine debuging output's level system, and seeing >> it be used for a while, I think its time we make a couple of new >> channels. >> >> They would be like the 'trace' chan

Re: Sugestion: A few changes to the

2007-03-22 Thread Kai Blin
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 16:42, Giles Cameron wrote: Hi > What I mean is having more "levels" in there because it seems like they > are being abbused right now, eg, it very well may be an error but it > isn't of use to many people. so it should be put somewhere someone who > is looking for it c

Re: dplayx: corrected the way nameserver initializes the sessiondesc structure on broadcast request reply

2007-03-22 Thread Kai Blin
On Thursday 22 March 2007 17:20, Alessandro Pignotti wrote: > Whitout this patch the directplay nameserver does not fully copy the > Session Description structure when replying to session request broadcast Good catch. Kai -- Kai Blin, WorldForge developerhttp://www.worldforge.org/ Wine de

x11drv: XDND: Fix file drop to properly support file:/// URIs (debugging problem)

2007-03-22 Thread Maciej Katafiasz
Hi, I'm working on a bug in winex11drv/xdnd.c, where file:/// URIs are not correctly interpreted, resulting in DnD broken most of the time. There are two parts of that bug: 1) X11DRV_XDND_BuildDropFiles() fails to properly handle absolute unix paths, which is exactly what you get from file:///, s

Re: Road to 1.0

2007-03-22 Thread James Hawkins
On 3/22/07, Vit Hrachovy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 03:32:14PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > >Given list of manual steps required to install Oblivion > >http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Oblivion:Linux > >this can be automated easily ... > > The problem that wine developers have with r

Re: Ok... Someone tell me WTF is going on here.

2007-03-22 Thread Giles Cameron
Stefan Dösinger wrote: > Am Samstag 17 März 2007 20:29 schrieb Giles Cameron: >> Ok. I have been tring to track down what appears to be a bug in wine >> while trying to get The Sims 2 (Seasons) to work. And so I have been >> tring to add to the debug a bunch of useless bunk. and I am getting VERY >

Re: Sugestion: A few changes to the

2007-03-22 Thread Giles Cameron
Robert Shearman wrote: Giles Cameron wrote: After learning about the wine debuging output's level system, and seeing it be used for a while, I think its time we make a couple of new channels. They would be like the 'trace' channel, only for more spefic purposes, these could by default be comp

Problem with program

2007-03-22 Thread Guillén Cambil , Enrique
Using wine "memoriesontv" it does not show the images and the generation of video interrupts

Re: wine opinion of a user

2007-03-22 Thread Nicholas van Rheede van Oudtshoorn
I imagine the Australian version would do just as well. Here's a page where you can request a download demo: http://www.sagepastel.com.au/au/form_demodownload_request.html I'd do it myself here, but this account that I'm using today is only dialup. Nicholas

Re: automatically running wineprefixcreate

2007-03-22 Thread James Hawkins
On 3/22/07, Tom Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/22/07, Jan Zerebecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:32:54AM -0500, Tom Spear wrote: > > On 3/22/07, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Winecfg should probably not allow moving the C drive; if you really

Re: SoC idea: add BITS support

2007-03-22 Thread Kai Blin
On Thursday 22 March 2007 16:00, Dan Kegel wrote: > Several applications require BITS (Background Intelligent Transfer > Service). Adding an implementation of BITS would be quite useful. This intrigued me, so I poked at the information on BITS a little. MSDN provides some fluff about using it, bu

Re: [netapi32/tests] Use GetModuleHandle and skip

2007-03-22 Thread Paul Vriens
Paul Vriens wrote: Hi, netapi32 is already linked to. Changelog Use GetModuleHandle and skip Cheers, Paul. From 6595fe64b93f2a81b4f6cbf77df58b2ef67c29ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Road to 1.0

2007-03-22 Thread Kai Blin
On Thursday 22 March 2007 16:25, Vit Hrachovy wrote: > First, it somehow mirrors info from AppDB. It can display application > usability for range of WINE versions and also make available application on > older WINE versions. > > For example Ubuntu Dapper Drake (6.06) will distribute and support W

Re: x11drv: XDND: Fix file drop to properly support file:/// URIs(debugging problem)

2007-03-22 Thread Felix Nawothnig
Maciej Katafiasz wrote: +if(GetLastError()) +{ + TRACE("Can't convert to WCHAR: %d\n", GetLastError()); + goto clean_wfn; +} This is not an appropriate way of testing for an API failure. What is inappropriate and how should I fix it? Most APIs don't change GLE on success

Re: automatically running wineprefixcreate

2007-03-22 Thread Tom Spear
On 3/22/07, Jan Zerebecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:32:54AM -0500, Tom Spear wrote: > On 3/22/07, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Winecfg should probably not allow moving the C drive; if you really > >want that, you have to know what you are doing, and

Re: Road to 1.0

2007-03-22 Thread Vit Hrachovy
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 03:32:14PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > >Given list of manual steps required to install Oblivion > >http://www.uesp.net/wiki/Oblivion:Linux > >this can be automated easily ... > > The problem that wine developers have with recipies > like the one you cite is that most of the s

SoC idea: add BITS support

2007-03-22 Thread Dan Kegel
Several applications require BITS (Background Intelligent Transfer Service). Adding an implementation of BITS would be quite useful. http://www.darvin.de/english/ is an interactive front end for BITS. The other apps I know of that require it are Visual C# Express 2005 and Google Pack, but there a

Re: automatically running wineprefixcreate

2007-03-22 Thread Jan Zerebecki
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:32:54AM -0500, Tom Spear wrote: > On 3/22/07, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Winecfg should probably not allow moving the C drive; if you really > >want that, you have to know what you are doing, and do it by hand. Why > >do you want to move it at all?

Re: automatically running wineprefixcreate

2007-03-22 Thread Joris Huizer
--- Tom Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Because I have a 20gb drive that Linux is installed > on, and a blank > 40gb mounted at /mnt/d (there is no windows > installed on it). I want > wine to install its things to my 40gb, and just for > no other good > reason than the fact that I am makin

Re: automatically running wineprefixcreate

2007-03-22 Thread Tom Spear
On 3/22/07, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Tom Spear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well if we are going to do that, then we might as well move the > folders to the new location for the user. Regardless, some change is > better than what we have now, because this is what was cau

Re: automatically running wineprefixcreate

2007-03-22 Thread Alexandre Julliard
"Tom Spear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well if we are going to do that, then we might as well move the > folders to the new location for the user. Regardless, some change is > better than what we have now, because this is what was causing me to > have to manually create windows\system32 and Pr

Re: automatically running wineprefixcreate

2007-03-22 Thread Tom Spear
On 3/21/07, Jan Zerebecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:24:23PM -0500, Tom Spear wrote: > Well, Im just wanting to have winecfg run wineprefixcreate after the > ok and apply buttons are pressed, so that the files and folders > created by wineprefixcreate are created in the

Re: kernel32: Implement ReplaceFileA/ReplaceFileW (revised)

2007-03-22 Thread Steven Edwards
On 3/19/07, Erich Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I still have not received any comments on the revised version of the attached patch. I would appreciate any suggestions. Should I maybe re-submit this patch? Yes. The policy is to wait a week and if its not made it in to git then resubmit.

Re: x11drv: XDND: Fix file drop to properly support file:/// URIs(debugging problem)

2007-03-22 Thread Maciej Katafiasz
On tor, 2007-03-22 at 12:02 +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > Please use the same indentation style as the existing does, i.e. 4 spaces, > not 2. Yep, I didn't fix that in that patch, I just forgot to set the indent style properly, and it's not a patch ready for submission anyway. But noted. > > +

Re: Regedit output to STDOUT / force registry files sync

2007-03-22 Thread Vit Hrachovy
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 11:38:03PM +0100, Detlef Riekenberg wrote: > On Di, 2007-03-20 at 21:12 +0100, Vit Hrachovy wrote: > > > Hi Bill, > > that's not the case I'm searching for. I'm aware that regedit can export > > into files. I simply want registry export to STDOUT nothing else. > > Did y

APPDB now appears to be working at normal acceptable speed for administrator login's + backlog of APPDB data requiring approval.

2007-03-22 Thread Nick Law
Thanks go out to whoever it was that fixed the AppDB so that it's now running nice and quick again. I can now login and submit applications/tests etc. There's a backlog of 500+ submissions which will take 2-4 hours to clear, hopefully this should be cleared within the next few days. Nick