Re: patches and more

2007-02-17 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Robert Shearman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: this one should be added to windows.h (maybe it's not the best place for it, but it works): #define stricmp strcasecmp This define is not present in the Platform SDK. It is a by-product of using glibc instead of msvcrt as your C library. If you us

Re: Font issue - workaround found

2007-02-17 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Timm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My one win app that makes me a devotee of WINE is TablEdit (demo at www.tabledit.com/download/tabled32.exe) has a custom font , tef260.ttf, that has failed to display since somewhere after ver 9.6. The program installs the font into c:\windows\font, but can not

re: generic.ppd does not appear in the build dir - cannot print

2007-02-17 Thread Dan Kegel
[I keep my source and object in different directories, and generic.ppd isn't found during build] That method of building is great, and is supported, but not too many people build that way, so bugs do creep in. You can either keep living with the workaround you found, or submit a patch to fix t

generic.ppd does not appear in the build dir - cannot print

2007-02-17 Thread Michael [Plouj] Ploujnikov
With a recent update to Wine 0.9.31, my printing issue [1] has changed in some way that actually generated some meaningful error messages being printed. I don't know if this is indeed the same issue or not. However, here are the messages that I started getting: $ wine notepad Couldn't find PPD fi

Re: 32 bpp cursors?

2007-02-17 Thread H. Verbeet
On 17/02/07, Duane Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, no server changes are needed just to implement 32 bits per pixel. There are rather simple changes needed in the file dlls/winex11.drv/mouse.c in create_cursor(), and the places that need to be changed are cleverly marked by "switch (ptr->b

Re: 32 bpp cursors?

2007-02-17 Thread H. Verbeet
On 17/02/07, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Could you break off some of the features and do them first, e.g. 32 bpp cursors? - Dan My plan was to redo the set for local cursors only, but there's also wined3d that needs attention :-)

Re: 32 bpp cursors?

2007-02-17 Thread Duane Clark
Dan Kegel wrote: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4273 points to a patch set that implements 32 bit per pixel cursors and a bunch of other cursor stuff. Looks like the patch got dropped by the author, though, and since it makes server changes, it's going to be hard to get past Alexandre.

Re: 32 bpp cursors?

2007-02-17 Thread Dan Kegel
On 2/16/07, H. Verbeet wrote: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4273 points to a patch set that implements 32 bit per pixel cursors and a bunch of other cursor stuff. [What's up with it?] I believe the problem is not that Henri has dropped the patches. The problem was that Alexandre didn'

Re: -ansi, -pedantic warnings and errors on

2007-02-17 Thread Joris Huizer
Robert Shearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joris Huizer wrote: > Hello, > > I was looking at the result of configuring with -ansi, > -pedantic flags. It gives loads of warnings (not all > relevant - also complaining about 'long long' not > being ansi) and indicates unnamed unions, among other > t

Re: -ansi, -pedantic warnings and errors on

2007-02-17 Thread Robert Shearman
Joris Huizer wrote: Hello, I was looking at the result of configuring with -ansi, -pedantic flags. It gives loads of warnings (not all relevant - also complaining about 'long long' not being ansi) and indicates unnamed unions, among other things. Could someone confirm my idea that unnamed unions

Re: patches and more

2007-02-17 Thread Robert Shearman
David Saez Padros wrote: This line should be added to commctrl.h: #define ListView_GetOrigin(hwndLV, ppt) \ (BOOL)SNDMSG((hwndLV), LVM_GETORIGIN, (WPARAM)0, (LPARAM)ppt) I've submitted a patch for this. this one should be added to windows.h (maybe it's not the best place for it, but it w

Error in ntdll/module.c?

2007-02-17 Thread Christian Iversen
(Please CC me, I'm not on the list) According to: http://undocumented.ntinternals.net/UserMode/Undocumented%20Functions/Executable%20Images/LdrGetProcedureAddress.html The parameter order for LdrGetProcedureAddress is (Handle, Function, Ordinal, Address) The file dlls/ntdll/module.c has the

Re: lostwages/ news/2006081001.xml news/2007021602 ...

2007-02-17 Thread Francois Gouget
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, WineHQ wrote: > ChangeSet ID: 30931 > CVSROOT: /opt/cvs-commit > Module name: lostwages > Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007/02/16 18:13:29 Could we get rid of wineowner account? It makes it impossible to know who's doing the changes. Each user having access to

Re: Resend 1/4 NtCreateMailslotFile tests

2007-02-17 Thread Eric Pouech
Jeff L a écrit : Eric Pouech wrote: Jeff Latimer a écrit : Establish the framework for testing NtCreateMailslotFile. Have fixed issues with NTSTATUS return codes etc. those tests belong to dlls/ntdll, not dlls/kernel32 also, if the test is for ntdll functions, it shouldn't use kernel32 ones.

Re: 1/4 NtCreateMailslotFile tests

2007-02-17 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Jeff L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Have reread MSDN http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms648410.aspx and it seems that NtClose has been superseded by CloseHandle. So I suppose that CloseHandle is the one to use. The information in MSDN is misleading in this case, CloseHandle is a ke

-ansi, -pedantic warnings and errors on

2007-02-17 Thread Joris Huizer
Hello, I was looking at the result of configuring with -ansi, -pedantic flags. It gives loads of warnings (not all relevant - also complaining about 'long long' not being ansi) and indicates unnamed unions, among other things. Could someone confirm my idea that unnamed unions must all be dealt wit

Re: Resend 1/4 NtCreateMailslotFile tests

2007-02-17 Thread Jeff L
Eric Pouech wrote: Jeff Latimer a écrit : Establish the framework for testing NtCreateMailslotFile. Have fixed issues with NTSTATUS return codes etc. those tests belong to dlls/ntdll, not dlls/kernel32 also, if the test is for ntdll functions, it shouldn't use kernel32 ones... hence, NtClose

Re: Resend 1/4 NtCreateMailslotFile tests

2007-02-17 Thread Eric Pouech
Jeff Latimer a écrit : Establish the framework for testing NtCreateMailslotFile. Have fixed issues with NTSTATUS return codes etc. those tests belong to dlls/ntdll, not dlls/kernel32 also, if the test is for ntdll functions, it shouldn't use kernel32 ones... hence, NtClose should be used inste

Re: 32 bpp cursors?

2007-02-17 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
> http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4273 points to a > patch set that implements 32 bit per pixel cursors > and a bunch of other cursor stuff. > > Looks like the patch got dropped by the author, though, > and since it makes server changes, it's going to be hard > to get past Alexandre. > > I

Re: 1/4 NtCreateMailslotFile tests

2007-02-17 Thread Jeff L
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: "Jeff L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: To close the handle returned by an NT API you have you use an NT API as well. What is not apparent in the explanation above? I have no problem with what you have said though I did have a bit of difficulty marrying to the sentence be

Re: 1/4 NtCreateMailslotFile tests

2007-02-17 Thread Dmitry Timoshkov
"Jeff L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: To close the handle returned by an NT API you have you use an NT API as well. What is not apparent in the explanation above? Have reread MSDN http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms648410.aspx and it seems that NtClose has been superseded by CloseHandl

Re: 1/4 NtCreateMailslotFile tests

2007-02-17 Thread Jeff L
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: "Jeff Latimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +ok( CloseHandle(hslot), "CloseHandle failed\n"); To close the handle returned by an NT API you have you use an NT API as well. Have reread MSDN http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms648410.aspx and it seems that NtClos