"Misha Koshelev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+/* MSDN 672579: "CCS_NORESIZE: Prevents the control from using the default width and height when setting its
+ * initial size or a new size. Instead, the control uses the width and height specified in the request for
+ * creation or sizing." This tes
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4273 points to a
patch set that implements 32 bit per pixel cursors
and a bunch of other cursor stuff.
Looks like the patch got dropped by the author, though,
and since it makes server changes, it's going to be hard
to get past Alexandre.
Is anyone interest
[-wine-users, +wine-devel]
On 2/6/07, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Neelesh wrote:
>I work in one public charitable trust. Here we are using one
>Accounting+Inventory+Report management Program. Two developers have
>developed in VB, Access and Crystal Reports.
>
>Now I am trying to use it
On 2/13/07, James Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/13/07, Felix Nawothnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Hawkins wrote:
> > This is not what needs to happen. The generic message sequence
> > testing code needs to be factored into msg.c, but the specific tests
> > need to stay in each
Hello,
Its been a while since I did any wine work so thought I'd fix some bugs in
the cmd shell. I have come across a call which fails at compile time which I
was interested in knowing the 'right' way to solve
_splitpath appears to exist in ntdll, but none of the #includes I have tried
pick it up
On Friday 16 February 2007 16:21, Tom Wickline wrote:
> I see Google is going to do there summer of code again this year :-)
Yup, let's see what it will bring this year.
> They plan to start accepting applications in March, so now would be
> the time for us to propose new projects and review the
Am Freitag 16 Februar 2007 21:28 schrieb H. Verbeet:
> Does this really matter?
Not really, but it avoids a few FIXMEs about unreleased surfaces and textures.
We could downgrade the FIXMEs to warnings, but not releasing the objects in
the test is wrong :-)
pgpibDoka7Xve.pgp
Description: PGP sig
On Friday 16 February 2007, H. Verbeet wrote:
> On 16/02/07, Neil Skrypuch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://otc.dyndns.org/stuff/wineshots/3dmark_capshack.patch
>
> That won't apply/compile anymore, use the attached patch instead.
Ah, thanks, I didn't notice that. It applied just a few days a
On 16/02/07, Neil Skrypuch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://otc.dyndns.org/stuff/wineshots/3dmark_capshack.patch
That won't apply/compile anymore, use the attached patch instead.
---
dlls/wined3d/directx.c |7 ---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/wi
I read about users confusion with wine version numbering scheme.
Personally, I would redirect these confused users to the wiki page at
wikipedia where it discusses what the numbers mean in a software
version numbering scheme.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_version
The MAME project had the
On Wednesday 14 February 2007, Mirek wrote:
> Luke Bratch napsal(a):
> >> Wow, great work! 3DMark 2006 with fbo looks
> >
> > realy coool!! And some
> >
> >> Nvidia SDK demos are completly fixed!
> >
> > How did you test 3DMark2006? When I try and run it,
> > it tells me I need Pixel Shader 2.
Does this really matter?
A few problems.
First off, the web server and smtp server for winehq.org are all on the
same box. WineHQ just gets hammered with spam some days. All that spam
load takes I/O away from mysql. I've updated the mail daemon to go into
a queue only mode when the load average gets to high.
Secondly, fo
Out of complete curiosity, what kind of problem caused only some people to
slow down, while me, on dial-up sped right along? Lol.
On 2/16/07, Jeremy Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I made some tweaks to the server on Wednesday. Hopefully everything is
running fine now.
Let me know if it is s
It does work in Ubuntu fine, which should conversely mean it works with any
other gnome menu standard desktop. *should should should*. And in Feisty
when you say always open this type of program (exe in this case) to use
wine, it sticks and now I can just double-click and I'm in. Any Distro using
90 percent of statistics don't contain a 0 either! Whoops... Jokes aside, I
was answering some wine related question on Ubuntuforums.org and came across
this, many light users tend to do it. I even thought of it that way when I
first learned about the common linux versioning system. I don't think
Am Freitag 16 Februar 2007 17:32 schrieb Joris Huizer:
> Hello,
>
> As a new wine is released I'm trying to get updated.
> Before I had used git for generating patches, I could
> do:
>
> git fetch; git rebase origin
>
> however, now this doesn't seem to pickup anything.
> How should I tell git to a
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 20:13 +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 10:53:51AM -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 09:40 -0600, John Smith wrote:
> > > Maybe this would be unworkable in git or whatnot but perhaps always
> > > making the minor version field double d
Joris Huizer wrote:
git fetch; git rebase origin
Have you committed all updates before you git rebase origin? git commit
-a -m "all"; git rebase origin; git reset HEAD^
Jeff Latimer
Francois Gouget wrote:
Also make test_getfile_no_open() succeed on Windows 98.
---
I have had some strange results with these tests. One of them was
actually succeeding in a todo_wine for a good while.
dlls/wininet/ftp.c | 12 +++-
dlls/wininet/tests/ftp.c | 12 +++-
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 10:53:51AM -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 09:40 -0600, John Smith wrote:
> > Maybe this would be unworkable in git or whatnot but perhaps always
> > making the minor version field double digit would do the trick?
>
> How about we make the next version
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 09:40 -0600, John Smith wrote:
> Maybe this would be unworkable in git or whatnot but perhaps always
> making the minor version field double digit would do the trick?
How about we make the next version Wine 0.9.99.01?
Or how about we make the next version 1.0 ;)
Thanks,
Sc
I made some tweaks to the server on Wednesday. Hopefully everything is
running fine now.
Let me know if it is still running slow.
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 16:35 -0600, John Smith wrote:
> Humm very strange it works well for me,
>
> I just tested it myself, seems reasonably fast in firefox 2.0.0.1 o
Am Donnerstag 15 Februar 2007 19:13 schrieb Juan Lang:
> The label cleanup isn't used anywhere except in the failure to create the
> device. In this case, wouldn't:
> if (FAILED(hr)) return;
> be clearer, and omit the unneeded label? There's no reason to release
> pDevice in creating it faile
> This sounds like a really simple way to support client-side and
> server-side drawing without the mixing that causes repeated network
> transfers: gdi32.dll GetDC, GetClientDC, and CreateCompatibleDC would
> all be done client-size, while IDirectWhatever::GetDC would return a
> device context th
Hello,
As a new wine is released I'm trying to get updated.
Before I had used git for generating patches, I could
do:
git fetch; git rebase origin
however, now this doesn't seem to pickup anything.
How should I tell git to actually update to the files
on the server?
Thanks,
Joris
_
Ack in my previous message I was speaking of 99 minor versions not
revisions, sorry for the typo!
John
On 2/16/07, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe this would be unworkable in git or whatnot but perhaps always making
the minor version field double digit would do the trick?
0.9.03
Maybe this would be unworkable in git or whatnot but perhaps always making
the minor version field double digit would do the trick?
0.9.03
0.9.09
0.9.10
...
0.9.30
etc
this would fix the sorting problems that arise from going from single to
double digit names in most programs too. As long as th
Hello,
I see Google is going to do there summer of code again this year :-)
They plan to start accepting applications in March, so now would be
the time for us to propose new projects and review the ones we have
already listed on the Wiki for interested applicants? As well as line
up mentors for
Scott Ritchie wrote:
> On several occasions I have received emails referring to Wine version
> 0.9.3. One person even told me about a regression from 0.9.28 to 0.9.3.
>
> Presumably, this version is being confused with Wine 0.9.30 in these
> letters, however I have been unable to tell whether pe
"Scott Ritchie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 09:48 +0200, SorinN wrote:
If I presume correct, instead of changing numbering system - maybe is
better to explain this system to users - somewhere on first page -
first paragraph - on Wine HQ - and on Synaptic ( or other package
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 09:48 +0200, SorinN wrote:
> If I presume correct, instead of changing numbering system - maybe is
> better to explain this system to users - somewhere on first page -
> first paragraph - on Wine HQ - and on Synaptic ( or other package
> managers where Details appear ).
>
I
Hi Shanren,
your commit 613998d4f6ff953a22a4455a28f77d2126642c7d
Author: Shanren Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon Feb 12 19:53:51 2007 -0800
comctl32: Add header tests.
generates a Coverity Warning in this code:
...
HIMAGELIST hImageList;
HIMAGELIST hImageListRetVal;
hImageL
33 matches
Mail list logo
