On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 09:56:54PM +, Andrew Talbot wrote:
> @@ -666,16 +672,20 @@
> if(psA->cPasteEntries > 0)
> {
> UINT i;
> -for(i = 0; i < psA->cPasteEntries; i++)
> +
> +for(i = psA->cPasteEntries; i != 0;)
Was there any need for this?
Huw.
Is it a wise idea to add a graphical warning to mscoree that Wine
doesn't support running .NET applications directly yet? I was thinking
about using a MessageBox() to deliver the warning. I also wanted the
popup to be displayed conditionally, in which if Wine was started from
the commandline, the b
Alexandre,
> The idea is that active_hooks is a shortcut to avoid calling the
> server if we know that a hook is not set. If we don't have a valid
> active_hooks then we need to call the server, which will then tell us
> whether or not we really have a hook to call.
I don't know if this matters,
This patch broke nvidia SDK opengl demos, i cant run it with this patch.
Here is some small report from terminal:
cvswine glsl_bump_mapping.exe
err:wgl:process_attach X11DRV or GDI32 not loaded. Cannot create default
context.
err:module:LdrInitializeThunk "opengl32.dll" failed to initialize, ab
"Phil Lodwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Active_hooks is pretty much set by the server. Bit 0x8000 is set to
> indicate that the bitmask is valid. One of my suspicions that I hope to
> confirm with debug is that in my case of failure active_hooks is 0.
>
> Would it not make more sense to
Unfortunately this problem I am seeing is very hard to reproduce. I have
added some more debug in case it happens again. However, looking at code,
the HOOK_IsHooked function seems strange:
BOOL HOOK_IsHooked( INT id )
{
struct user_thread_info *thread_info = get_user_thread_info();
if (
Dmitry Timoshkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> diff -up a/server/protocol.def b/server/protocol.def
> --- a/server/protocol.def 2006-11-06 18:35:52.0 +0800
> +++ b/server/protocol.def 2006-11-06 21:57:22.0 +0800
> @@ -335,6 +335,7 @@ struct token_groups
> /* Retrieve infor
Hi
Does anyone know (or know where to find) what it means for biWidth
and/or biHeight for a DIB section's BITMAPINFOHEADER to be negative?
It seems largely undocumented. The MSDN says a negative biHeight is a
top-down bitmap (the normal positive biHeight is bottom-up), so does a
negative biWidth
Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How should/can we deal with this? Should we export by name as well? (get
> rid of the -noname). Or do we need to change the test to first try by
> name and then by ordinal (or only by ordinal)?
The test should load them by ordinal only.
--
Alexandre Jul
Rob, as the HandleTable was your suggestion, could you provide a comment
on whether these patches are a practical way forward?
Jeff Latimer
Jeff Latimer wrote:
These 2 patches implement HandleTables for tracking memory usage for
the SCRIPT_STRING_ANALYSIS pointer. The problem is that the ssa
10 matches
Mail list logo
