Ansgar Becker googlemail.com> writes:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I'm Ansgar Becker, the main-author of HeidiSQL. I saw that HeidiSQL is
> in your appdb! very cool ;) http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?iAppId=3326
>
> However, some of the buttons on HeidiSQL's main-toolbar are twisted. I'm
> not a C
Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
> * On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> Unless Alexandre confirms the requirement directly. In such case I am
> going to put this stuff into our Wiki ^^ even write a patch for cleaning
> the calls myself ;)
No wonder people can't get _any_ response to their pa
Since we're trying to get "make test" working nicely on everybody's
machine, here's the failure of the day for me.
This is on Debian/unstable for AMD64, with libGL and libGLU provided by
ia32-libs 1.15.
Mike
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/mike/wine/dlls/d3d9/tests'
../../../tools/runt
Ge van Geldorp wrote:
Changelog:
Ge van Geldorp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Add 64-bit proxy/stub code for core COM interfaces
It's unlikely that this patch will be accepted. It's better to fix widl
to generate the 64bit code rather than add more midl generated code.
Mike
Ansgar Becker escribió:
Hi there,
I'm Ansgar Becker, the main-author of HeidiSQL. I saw that HeidiSQL is
in your appdb! very cool ;)
http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?iAppId=3326
However, some of the buttons on HeidiSQL's main-toolbar are twisted.
I'm not a C programmer, so I'm a bit lost
Has there been any discussion or progress on how to fix bug #1598 about
Delphi/VisualBasic applications not having minimize/maximize decorations
(http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1598)? According to one of the
comments, the window management code would not be touched before 0.9 .
However
Hi there,
I'm Ansgar Becker, the main-author of HeidiSQL. I saw that HeidiSQL is
in your appdb! very cool ;) http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?iAppId=3326
However, some of the buttons on HeidiSQL's main-toolbar are twisted. I'm
not a C programmer, so I'm a bit lost in Wine... but I can fix
[I meant to say that pointer declarations are read right-to-left, not
left-to-right. So the corrected question is:]
Can you verify something for me, please?
The SDK declares ListView_InsertColumn() as:
int ListView_InsertColumn(
HWND hwnd,
int iCol,
const LPLVCOLUMN pcol
);
In commc
On 10/6/06, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For example, if something is marked as a BUG then I'd expect the person
that marked it, to follow up (either by a patch, by chasing somebody to
look into this, or to create a bugzilla entry). He/she has spent already
some time looking into this
On 10/6/06, Michal Okresa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
---
dlls/oleaut32/tests/tmarshal.c | 1099
dlls/oleaut32/tests/tmarshal.idl | 159 +
dlls/oleaut32/tests/tmarshal.rc| 30 +
dlls/oleaut32/tests/tmarshal_dispids.h | 34 +
4 files
Tim Schmidt wrote:
On 10/6/06, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 06 October 2006 10:19, Tim Schmidt wrote:
> Again, works for me. I believe the only part missing for this case is
> the simulation. Of course, there's the added possibility that apps
> will go mucking about with data
On 10/6/06, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > Say, has anybody posted a summary of the Coverity reports lately?> > e.g. how many issues it flagged in Wine, and how many have been examined?
> > http://scan.coverity.com/ is the only place I know of.OK, I just logged in there and scraped the t
Can you verify something for me, please?
The SDK declares ListView_InsertColumn() as:
int ListView_InsertColumn(
HWND hwnd,
int iCol,
const LPLVCOLUMN pcol
);
In commctrl.h, we have:
#define ListView_InsertColumnA(hwnd,iCol,pcol) \
(INT)SNDMSGA((hwnd),LVM_INSERTCOLUMNA,(WPARAM)(
Hi,
A recent patch by Rob Shearman has caused two Adobe installers to
crash when they try to load up a WebBrowser control to display a EULA:
Commit: ccb634fdee50936c35880a6cffd70e0bcd946b5a
URL:
http://source.winehq.org/git/?p=wine.git;a=commit;h=ccb634fdee50936c35880a6cffd70e0bcd946b5a
Aut
> Am Freitag, 6. Oktober 2006 15:26 schrieb Ulrich Czekalla:
> > From our discussions at wineconf we concluded that overriding the
> various
> > functions such as glViewport and glScissor will get us there for most
> > applications.
> >
> > The only thing this will not do is handle the case where
Saulius Krasuckas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unless Alexandre confirms the requirement directly. In such case I am
> going to put this stuff into our Wiki ^^ even write a patch for cleaning
> the calls myself ;)
There's no need to enforce 0xdeadbeef, other similar magic values work
just as
Hi there.
A patch by Iulian Marinescu was posted on Bugzilla a few days ago to optimize
client-side DIB copy operations. I tested it, and it definitely improves the
performance of a few applications quite a bit (Propellerhead Reason for
example). Even though I can't comment on the quality of th
Am Freitag, 6. Oktober 2006 15:26 schrieb Ulrich Czekalla:
> From our discussions at wineconf we concluded that overriding the various
> functions such as glViewport and glScissor will get us there for most
> applications.
>
> The only thing this will not do is handle the case where a child window
* On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
> * Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
> > --- a/dlls/lz32/tests/lzexpand_main.c
> > +++ b/dlls/lz32/tests/lzexpand_main.c
> > @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ static void test_LZOpenFileA_existing_co
> >memset(&filled_0xA5, 0xA5, OFS_MAXPATHNAME);
> >memset(&test, 0x
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ static HRESULT WINAPI IDirect3DDevice9I
> >
> > TRACE("(%p) : w(%d) h(%d) fmt(%d) [EMAIL PROTECTED]", This, Width,
> > Height, Format, *ppSurface);
> >
> > -hrc = IWineD3DDevice_CreateSurface(Thi
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:30:43PM +0200, Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The plan is to get all the X-specific opengl code into winex11.drv and to get
> rid of things like ExtEscape. I also want to avoid using WineGLContext in
> opengl32.dll as I plan to change this too. A call like Sync
Tim Schmidt wrote:
> Again, works for me. I believe the only part missing for this case is
> the simulation. Of course, there's the added possibility that apps
> will go mucking about with data other apps care about, in which case a
> per-executable simulated device would be best.
Wouldn't suc
Hi,
The plan is to get all the X-specific opengl code into winex11.drv and to get
rid of things like ExtEscape. I also want to avoid using WineGLContext in
opengl32.dll as I plan to change this too. A call like SyncCurrentDrawable
should in the end be placed inside winex11.drv.
I haven't looke
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 07:50:34PM -0400, Tim Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/5/06, Martin Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I wonder if we can get the shockwave player working with the linux
> >version of linux via some kind of wine layer instead of installing
> >firefox for windows.
>
> http://www.code
Stefan Dösinger wrote:
>>Should we split lines like this? It's doesn't fit even on my 1600x1200
>>display.
>
> I wanted to do a lot of reformating like this, but AJ put a veto before I
> even
> started :-/
If you change the line anyway you can split it up too. It dosn't add an
additional entry
On 06/10/06, Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Should we split lines like this? It's doesn't fit even on my 1600x1200
> display.
I wanted to do a lot of reformating like this, but AJ put a veto before I even
started :-/
If you're changing the line, it should generally be ok to eg
Maybe something like wined3d_private_types.h, although perhaps that's
a bit long.
On 10/6/06, Kai Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 06 October 2006 10:19, Tim Schmidt wrote:
> Again, works for me. I believe the only part missing for this case is
> the simulation. Of course, there's the added possibility that apps
> will go mucking about with data other apps care abo
Am Freitag 06 Oktober 2006 04:48 schrieb Ivan Gyurdiev:
> > I don't have a problem with creating another file if you think that's
> > better, but please come up with another name, don't use the same name
> > as the global header.
>
> Henri and Stefan, any preference?
> (you better have an opinion s
On Friday 06 October 2006 10:19, Tim Schmidt wrote:
> Again, works for me. I believe the only part missing for this case is
> the simulation. Of course, there's the added possibility that apps
> will go mucking about with data other apps care about, in which case a
> per-executable simulated dev
Am Freitag 06 Oktober 2006 08:42 schrieben Sie:
> Stefan Dösinger wrote:
> > @@ -851,6 +853,13 @@ DllMain(HINSTANCE hInstDLL,
> >
> > +/* Initialize the ddraw object list critical section
> > unconditionally + * Even if the app doesn't use multithreaded
> > ddraw objects it can stil
Hi,
> Should we split lines like this? It's doesn't fit even on my 1600x1200
> display.
I wanted to do a lot of reformating like this, but AJ put a veto before I even
started :-/
> > diff --git a/include/wine/wined3d_types.h b/include/wine/wined3d_types.h
> > index e70a814..278e7d7 100644
> > ---
Am Freitag 06 Oktober 2006 03:39 schrieb EA Durbin:
> Are there any windows based dvd players that will work under wine?
I was working on ddraw overlays the last 2 days which would help getting them
working, but I have to pause my efforts until the wined3d->wgl move is done.
pgp7q052xlxMw.pgp
De
Am Donnerstag 05 Oktober 2006 09:45 schrieb Christopher GAUTIER:
> It was due to GL_REGISTER_COMBINERS_NV being glEnabled() before entering
> IWineD3DSurfaceImpl_BltOverride. I believe it should be glDisabled()
> temporarily while blitting.
Yes, they should be disabled, good catch :-)
pgpRvySrObX
On 10/6/06, Vincent Povirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/5/06, Tim Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An application you are running (Application Name) is attempting to
> access a disk in a potentially unsafe way. Would you like it to
> access a safe virtual disk instead?
>
> Yes No
A dia
On Fri, 2006-10-06 at 00:35 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On 10/6/06, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On the other hand, several annotations are from April (6 months
> > development since) and several bugs have been fixed already (but of
> > course not seen).
>
> Say, has anybody posted a s
On 10/5/06, Tim Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
An application you are running (Application Name) is attempting to
access a disk in a potentially unsafe way. Would you like it to
access a safe virtual disk instead?
Yes No
A dialog like this would only serve to confuse people. If a setting
On 10/6/06, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the other hand, several annotations are from April (6 months
development since) and several bugs have been fixed already (but of
course not seen).
Say, has anybody posted a summary of the Coverity reports lately?
e.g. how many issues it flag
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 23:55 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On 10/5/06, Paul Vriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the email sent by Coverity also asks for a 'main contact'. Do we have
> > such a person already?
>
> Not that I know. Are you volunteering?
If nobody steps up, sure.
>
> > Can we give t
39 matches
Mail list logo
